SP
Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Fourth-quarter results are scheduled for December 1; management pre-guided full-year FY2025 to revenue of $79.1M (+13% YoY), adjusted EBITDA margin ~28%, and adjusted diluted EPS $1.03, implying a sequential Q4 step-down tied to services softness and a large client cancellation; consensus for Q4 is $17.39M revenue and $(0.02) EPS.*
- FY2025 guidance was lowered in July to revenue $76–$80M and adjusted diluted EPS $0.93–$1.06, then affirmed by the October preliminary; management issued FY2026 preliminary guidance for revenue $79–$82M, adjusted EBITDA margin 26–30%, and adjusted diluted EPS $1.03–$1.10.
- Q3 delivered resilient software growth (62% mix) and strong non-GAAP profitability (adjusted EBITDA 37%, adjusted EPS $0.45), but a non-cash impairment of $77.2M drove a GAAP EPS loss of $(3.35).
- Near-term stock catalysts: the December 1 earnings release and call (with FY2026 guidance detail), progress on AI rollouts (GastroPlus X.2 on S+ Cloud), and backlog conversion; overhang from multiple law-firm “investigation alerts” was prominent in Q4 headlines.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Software resilience and mix: Q3 software revenue grew 6% to $12.6M (62% of total), aided by ADMET Predictor and modest GastroPlus/Monolix growth; adjusted EBITDA rose to $7.4M (37% of revenue), and adjusted EPS to $0.45.
- AI and cloud strategy momentum: “GastroPlus X.2 (GPX.2) marks the debut of our AI-powered tools on the S+ Cloud—an important first step in our broader, integrated Cloud and AI strategy.” — CEO Shawn O’Connor.
- Backlog held up despite services caution: Q3 backlog ended at $20.7M, up both sequentially and year over year, with medical communications contributing.
What Went Wrong
- Significant non-GAAP/GAAP divergence: A one-time non-cash impairment of $77.2M drove GAAP net loss of $67.3M (diluted EPS $(3.35)) despite non-GAAP profitability.
- Services pressure and cancellation: Management cited slower bookings conversion, project delays, and a “significant client cancellation” (~$2M near-term impact), weighing on Q3 and flowing into Q4/FY2026.
- Renewal rates dipped: Q3 software renewal fell to 84% on fees and 71% on accounts (vs. 90% and 84% in Q2), driven by client consolidations/site closures.
Financial Results
Income and Profitability vs. Prior Periods and Estimates
Estimates marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Mix and Segments
Software Product Contribution (% of Software Revenue)
KPIs and Operating Metrics
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We expect to successfully meet our revised fiscal 2025 guidance… Looking ahead, we are issuing preliminary guidance for fiscal 2026… GPX.2 marks the debut of our AI‑powered tools on the S+ Cloud.” — Shawn O’Connor, CEO.
- “Our software revenue continued to perform well … ADMET Predictor® drove growth … we recognized a one‑time non‑cash impairment charge of $77.2 million … we implemented a strategic reorganization.” — Q3 press release.
- “Our AI‑enhanced GastroPlus release … includes AssessmentsPlus … Orchestrator … GastroPlusGPT … portfolio‑wide AI rollout will extend into ADMET Predictor and MonolixSuite.” — Q3 call prepared remarks.
- “We remain well‑capitalized with no debt and strong free cash flow to execute our growth strategy.” — CFO.
Q&A Highlights
- Q4 margin/EBITDA color: Management guided Q4 adjusted EBITDA margin to the mid‑high 20s, with revenue step‑down and largely fixed costs constraining margins despite cost saves.
- Renewal rates and consolidations: Q3 renewal rates fell (fees 84%, accounts 71%) due to client consolidations/site closures; management views long‑term fee renewals in the 90–95% range.
- Services cancellation and pipeline: A single client cancellation (~$2M impact) and delayed project starts weigh on Q4; backlog increased but timing pushed into later quarters.
- AI monetization and cadence: Pricing aims to capture value of AI features without a near‑term shift to transactional SaaS; cloud delivery may enable more frequent updates subject to client IT/SOP constraints.
- Pro‑ficiency/MedCom expectations: FY2025 contribution guided to $9–$12M; a large MedCom engagement initiated with some delay, still running through calendar 2025.
Estimates Context
- Q4 2025 consensus: Revenue $17.39M; Primary EPS $(0.02); 6 revenue estimates and 2 EPS estimates.* Compared to Q3 actual revenue $20.36M and GAAP EPS $(3.35) driven by impairment, consensus implies a sequential revenue decline and near-breakeven GAAP EPS consistent with management’s Q4 caution (services softness, cancellation). *
- Estimates may need to adjust after December 1: management will provide full FY2026 guidance details and clarify Q4 mix/margins; watch for services booking conversion cadence and any software renewal normalization.
Estimates marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Expect a softer Q4 vs. Q3 on revenue/margins due to services delays and a ~$2M cancellation; adjusted EBITDA margin guided mid‑high 20s. Short‑term trading: bias to volatility around Dec 1 as narrative focuses on services conversion and renewal rates.
- FY2025 preliminary results suggest Simulations Plus will meet revised guidance at the high end; FY2026 preliminary guide points to low‑single‑digit revenue growth with margin stability (adjusted EBITDA 26–30%). Medium‑term thesis: software resilience plus AI productivity gains.
- Software is the ballast: GastroPlus, MonolixSuite, and ADMET Predictor continue to grow; watch for AI‑enabled upsells and renewal normalization back toward 90–95% on fees.
- Backlog is healthy but slower to convert; monitor MedCom and CPP project starts and the impact of macro uncertainties (IRA pricing, tariffs, funding).
- Non‑GAAP vs GAAP optics matter: the large impairment obscured underlying profitability in Q3; focus on adjusted metrics and cash (no debt, positive operating cash flow trajectory).
- AI rollouts are a core catalyst: GPX.2 on S+ Cloud is live; portfolio‑wide AI integration (“AssessmentsPlus,” “Orchestrator,” “GastroPlusGPT”) can drive user productivity and pricing power.
- Legal headline overhang exists from multiple external “investigation alerts,” though these are not company‑issued; monitor for any SEC or litigation developments.