SE
SM Energy Co (SM)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Record net production of 19.0 MMBoe (209.1 MBoe/d) at 55% oil, driven by outperformance in Uinta Basin; GAAP diluted EPS $1.76 and Adjusted EPS $1.50; Adjusted EBITDAX $569.6M; Adjusted free cash flow $113.9M .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, Adjusted EPS materially beat, EBITDA beat, while revenue modestly missed; management emphasized operational efficiency, takeaway optimization, and debt reduction to 1.2x net debt/Adjusted EBITDAX, with line-of-sight to ~1.0x by year-end at current prices .
- Guidance updated: oil mix for FY25 raised to 53–54% (from 51–52%); capex raised to ~$1.375B (from ~$1.3B); DD&A raised to ~$16/Boe (from ~$15/Boe); cash taxes cut to ~$10M (from $75–$95M) due to OBBBA; Q3 capex $300–$320M and production 209–215 MBoe/d at 53–54% oil .
- Catalysts: Uinta well performance and logistics execution, sharply lower 2025 cash taxes from OBBBA, higher oil mix, and progress to target leverage; watch WAHA gas basis and higher transportation costs as near-term headwinds .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Uinta Basin outperformance: production averaged 87% oil; improved logistics and takeaway yielded record volumes and better reliability, supporting the quarter’s beat and FCF generation .
- Debt reduction and leverage progress: revolver paid to zero, cash $101.9M, net debt-to-Adjusted EBITDAX cut to 1.2x; CFO indicated line-of-sight to ~1.0x by year-end at current commodity prices .
- Management tone on asset quality and execution: “Record production combined with our low breakeven cost assets delivered excellent bottom line results…we are well-positioned for a strong second half of the year” — CEO Herb Vogel .
What Went Wrong
- Realized gas prices challenged by WAHA basis and pipeline constraints in Midland Basin; gas price declines vs Q1 pressured realized equivalents despite hedge gains .
- Transportation cost per Boe rose meaningfully YoY (Q2: $4.13 vs $1.94), reflecting takeaway dynamics and regional mix; LOE also higher YoY .
- Capex increased vs plan due to acceleration and non-operated projects, raising FY25 capex guidance (~$1.375B vs ~$1.3B prior), with incremental spend not impacting 2025 production .
Financial Results
GAAP and Adjusted Results vs prior periods
Margin comparison (derived; based on reported figures)
Production and pricing KPIs
Segment breakdown (Q2 2025)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “This was a standout quarter…Record production combined with our low breakeven cost assets delivered excellent bottom line results…we are well-positioned for a strong second half of the year, expecting to achieve our 1.0x leverage target by year-end at current commodity prices.” — CEO Herb Vogel .
- “Costs are coming down [in Uinta]…stellar well performance…subsurface team worked very well with completion optimization.” — COO Beth McDonald .
- “We ended the quarter at 1.2 times, really more like 1.1 times on a full-year basis for XCL…we have authorization…$500 million share buyback program…you very well could see us step in.” — CFO Wade Pursell .
- “We’re cautious on gas…looking for sustained price signals…structural demand changes between LNG and data centers.” — CEO Herb Vogel .
Q&A Highlights
- Cash taxes trajectory: CFO expects similar low cash taxes into 2026 if OBBBA provisions and spending remain similar; recurring benefit from R&D expensing highlighted .
- Uinta sustainability and cadence: Q2 outperformance driven by front-half TILs and well results; expect continued strong performance but production timing front-end weighted; rig count reduced to six across assets for 2026 planning, aiming for free cash flow optimization .
- Non-operated spend and capex phasing: FY25 capex raised primarily for high-return non-op Midland projects; Q4 capex expected to come down; incremental spend adds 2026 production, not 2025 .
- Takeaway and marketing: Execution-driven increase in rail cars and SLC refinery volumes; optimization between SLC and Gulf Coast to maximize realizations; no change in broader marketing strategy .
- Buyback flexibility: With leverage near 1.0x at current prices, management may opportunistically deploy buybacks under $500M authorization, watching oil price stability .
Estimates Context
Notes: * Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Q2 2025: EPS beat (Adjusted $1.50 vs $1.252*), EBITDA beat ($587.9M* vs $527.4M*), revenue modest miss ($762.7M* vs $783.5M*). Q1 2025: EPS beat, revenue slight miss, EBITDA modest miss; Q2 2024: EPS beat, EBITDA beat, revenue slight miss. S&P Global values compared to company Adjusted EPS and S&P-defined revenue/EBITDA. .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution in Uinta is driving higher oil mix and strong FCF; management believes performance is repeatable with improving costs, supporting medium-term margin resilience .
- FY25 guidance de-risks equity story: higher oil %, lower cash taxes (~$10M) via OBBBA, steady production range, and path to ~1.0x leverage; potential for opportunistic buybacks under $500M authorization .
- Watch gas basis: WAHA constraints continue into 2026; transportation costs elevated; hedge book provides partial offset (oil collars ~$65–$70 and gas $3.67–$4.31 for 2H25) .
- Non-op capex raises FY25 spend without 2025 volume uplift; positive for 2026 volumes but increases near-term capital intensity; Q4 capex expected to decline .
- Near-term trading: EPS/EBITDA beats against consensus and tax relief could support sentiment; revenue miss and higher transport expense are offset by oilier mix and Uinta execution .
- Medium-term thesis: differentiated logistics/marketing, improved Uinta well performance, and capital efficiency across three core areas underpin sustained FCF and deleveraging, with optionality for buybacks .
- Risks: commodity volatility (especially gas), WAHA basis pressure, and timing of non-op projects; monitoring OBBBA implementation in Q3 results .