Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

ST

SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT)·Q3 2024 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2024 revenue fell 55.6% year over year to $6.33M as California’s NEM 3.0 policy shift and higher interest rates reduced residential demand; gross margin compressed to 19.9% from 28.4% a year ago .
  • The company recorded a $7.5M non‑cash goodwill impairment tied to its China segment (no revenue since 2022), and booked ~$1.3M of stock‑based compensation related to restricted stock vesting; net loss was $(9.62)M, or $(0.21) per share .
  • Sequentially, revenue improved from Q2 to Q3 ($4.5M → $6.33M), but profitability remained negative due to operating cost burden and the impairment .
  • No formal quantitative guidance was issued; management is pursuing commercial EPC opportunities (non‑binding MOU/term sheet) but highlighted uncertainty and preconditions (financing, PPAs) before projects can convert to revenue .
  • Consensus estimates from S&P Global were unavailable via our data access at this time; as a result, we cannot present “vs. estimates” comparisons for Q3 2024 (see Estimates Context) [GetEstimates error].

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Sequential revenue uptick: Q3 revenue rose to $6.33M from $4.5M in Q2 as project flow improved off a soft Q2 base .
  • LED momentum as partial offset: LED revenue increased year over year to $1.11M (+34.9%), reflecting more projects awarded despite solar softness .
  • Early commercial pipeline building: Management signed a non‑binding MOU for a 4.27 MW PV + 2.0 MW storage + EV charging project in Las Vegas, and a non‑binding term sheet for another major mall project in San Jose; CEO: “This project represents the beginning of an exciting new chapter for SolarMax” .

What Went Wrong

  • Demand reset after NEM 3.0 and higher rates: Solar system revenue fell 61.5% YoY in Q3 driven by California’s NEM 3.0 export rate cuts and elevated borrowing costs; systems completed fell 56.0% and wattage deployed fell 71.4% YoY .
  • Large non‑cash charges and cost burden: A $7.5M goodwill impairment (China) and ~$1.3M restricted‑stock expense in Q3 drove a $(9.62)M net loss; Q3 G&A was elevated by public company costs and stock comp vesting .
  • Liquidity and going‑concern risk: Cash was $0.87M at quarter‑end with ~$19.9M of debt due within 12 months; management is seeking exchanges into longer‑dated convertibles. Nasdaq notified SMXT of non‑compliance on market value and minimum bid price, adding equity market risk .

Financial Results

YoY: Q3 2024 vs Q3 2023

MetricQ3 2023Q3 2024
Revenue ($USD Millions)$14.27 $6.33
Gross Profit ($USD Millions)$4.05 $1.26
Gross Margin %28.4% 19.9%
Net Income (Loss) ($USD Millions)$1.47 $(9.62)
Diluted EPS ($USD)$0.04 $(0.21)

Sequential: 2024 Year-to-Date

MetricQ1 2024Q2 2024Q3 2024
Revenue ($USD Millions)$5.76 $4.50 $6.33
Gross Profit ($USD Millions)$(0.46) $0.60 $1.26
Net Income (Loss) ($USD Millions)$(19.27) $(2.20) $(9.62)
Diluted EPS ($USD)$(0.46) $(0.05) $(0.21)

Revenue Mix (Q3)

Business LineQ3 2023 ($)Q3 2024 ($)
Solar Energy & Battery Systems$13,325,437 $5,131,970
LED Projects$823,146 $1,110,374
Financing Related$125,024 $89,262
Total$14,273,607 $6,331,606

Additional P&L items (Q3 2024):

  • Operating Expenses: $11.28M, including G&A $3.68M, Selling & Marketing $0.14M, and $7.46M goodwill impairment .
  • Stock‑based compensation: ~$1.33M recorded in Q3 due to restricted‑stock vesting/out‑of‑period adjustment .

Balance sheet and liquidity highlights (as of 9/30/24):

  • Cash & cash equivalents: $0.87M; Short‑term investments: $7.71M (notes extended to Dec 2024) .
  • Current portion of debt due in 12 months: ~$19.9M; seeking exchanges into 5‑year convertible notes .

Guidance Changes

No formal quantitative guidance was provided for revenue, margins, OpEx, OI&E, tax rate, or segment KPIs.

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
RevenueFY/Q4 2024N/ANo numeric guidance; management reiterated pursuit of commercial EPC pipeline (subject to financing, PPAs)Maintained lack of formal guidance
Margins / OpExFY/Q4 2024N/ANo numeric guidanceMaintained lack of formal guidance
Segment / ProjectsFY/Q4 2024N/ANon‑binding Las Vegas MOU and San Jose term sheet; not yet revenue‑backedQualitative only

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

Note: We did not locate a Q3 2024 earnings call transcript for SMXT; themes below reflect the Q3 10‑Q and press releases.

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2 2024)Current Period (Q3 2024)Trend
California NEM 3.0 impactQ1: demand pull‑forward in 2023 and weather headwinds; Q2: continued revenue decline post‑NEM 3.0 Q3: 75% export rate cut under NEM 3.0 emphasized; YoY declines in systems completed (-56%) and wattage (-71%) Worsening vs 2023; stabilizing sequentially
Interest rates / consumer financingQ2: higher borrowing costs hurting demand Q3: continued industry‑wide pressure cited Persistent headwind
Commercial EPC pipelineQ2: non‑binding MOU (Las Vegas) and term sheet (San Jose) Q3: still non‑binding; multiple preconditions (financing, PPAs) highlighted Early‑stage
China operationsQ1: no contributions; stock‑based comp from IPO Q3: full goodwill impairment of $7.5M; no revenue since 2022 De‑emphasized/Impaired
Costs / Stock‑based compQ1: $17.2M vesting tied to IPO; G&A inflation Q3: ~$1.3M restricted stock expense and public company cost pressures Normalizing but still elevated
Liquidity / Capital structureQ3: cash $0.87M; ~$19.9M of near‑term debt; exchanging to longer‑dated convertibles sought; Nasdaq non‑compliance notices Heightened risk

Management Commentary

  • “Our third quarter performance reflects … a $7.5 million goodwill impairment associated with our China segment, which has not generated any revenue since 2022… increased borrowing costs … resulted in a decline in consumer investment in solar across the industry… we recognized … termination of forfeiture provisions of restricted stock of approximately $1.3 million and the impairment of goodwill … approximately $7.5 million” — CEO David Hsu .
  • “Efforts to significantly expand our commercial solar project portfolio are well underway… we anticipate these projects will play an increasing role in our revenue growth in the quarters ahead. However, we cannot predict the effect… of federal policies” — CEO David Hsu .
  • “Last year’s exceptionally high revenues were largely driven by an unusual surge in demand … before the regulatory changes in California took effect in April 2023… revenues were impacted by increased borrowing costs” — CEO David Hsu (Q2 PR) .
  • On NEM 3.0: CPUC’s regime cut export rates by ~75%, lengthening residential paybacks; workforce downsized ~25% in early 2024; residential softness expected as company pivots to commercial .

Q&A Highlights

We did not locate a Q3 2024 earnings call transcript for SMXT; therefore, no Q&A themes or clarifications are available for this period. Commentary herein relies on the 8‑K press release and 10‑Q MD&A .

Estimates Context

  • We attempted to retrieve S&P Global consensus for Q3 2024 revenue and EPS, but data access returned a “Daily Request Limit … Exceeded” error. As a result, “vs. estimates” comparisons are unavailable in this recap. If access is restored, we can refresh with consensus and mark beats/misses accordingly [GetEstimates error].

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Residential solar normalization continues post‑NEM 3.0; Q3 revenue down 55.6% YoY and gross margin down ~850 bps YoY, underscoring structural pressure in California and from higher rates .
  • Non‑cash items dominated optics: $7.5M goodwill impairment (China) and ~$1.3M restricted‑stock expense weighed on operating results and EPS in Q3 .
  • Liquidity and capital structure warrant close monitoring: $0.87M cash, material near‑term debt maturities (~$19.9M) with planned exchanges into 5‑year convertibles; Nasdaq market value and minimum bid notices elevate risk .
  • Commercial EPC pursuit is a potential medium‑term offset, but current opportunities remain non‑binding and contingent on financing and PPAs—conversion and timing uncertainty remain high .
  • LED project growth provides diversification (+34.9% YoY in Q3), but is not yet large enough to backfill residential solar declines .
  • Trading setup: absent confirmed commercial awards or improved estimate trends (once retrievable), near‑term stock catalysts are limited; watch for debt exchanges, any delisting remediation steps, and tangible EPC wins as potential inflection points .

Supporting details and additional analysis

Segment Breakdown and Operating Detail (Q3 2024)

  • Revenue entirely from U.S. segment; PRC had no revenue; equity income from PRC joint ventures contributed $0.254M in Q3 .
  • Operating expenses (Q3): G&A $3.68M (elevated by stock comp and public company costs), Selling & Marketing $0.14M, and Goodwill Impairment $7.46M .
  • Interest expense/income: Q3 interest expense ~$0.40M; interest income ~$0.21M, including returns on short‑term notes extended to Dec 2024 .

Cash, Debt, and Going Concern

  • Cash & equivalents: $0.87M; short‑term investments: $7.71M (notes extended) .
  • Current liabilities: $37.72M; plan to exchange ~$19.9M due in next 12 months into longer‑dated convertibles; working capital deficit ~$(13.6)M; substantial doubt about going concern disclosed .
  • Debt mix: $16.25M 4% secured convertibles; $11.5M related‑party EB‑5 loans at 3%; $2.9M unsecured; $1.36M related‑party 8% notes; scheduled maturities laid out in filings .

Additional Context on NEM 3.0 and Demand

  • CPUC NEM 3.0 reduced export rates ~75% vs NEM 2.0; management cut ~25% of residential design/installation headcount in Jan‑2024; expects near‑term residential softness, partially offset by third‑party leasing and commercial focus .
  • Q3 YoY solar sales drop reflected 56% fewer completed systems and 71% lower wattage deployed; LED saw growth .

Disclosures and Risks

  • Nasdaq notices for market value of listed securities and $1 bid price minimum; 180‑day remediation windows expiring April 2025 .
  • No new projects or PRC agreements; full goodwill impairment recorded for China .
  • Inflation and supply chain commentary: materials/labor inflation pressured costs and margins; company raised prices where possible but competitive limits remain .