Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

ST

SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2025 revenue surged to $30,602,588, up 383% year over year, driven by initial recognition from the $127.3M Longfellow Texas BESS EPC contract; however, gross margin compressed to 3.1% as uninstalled materials were recognized at cost .
  • Net loss improved to $2,258,104 ($0.04 diluted EPS) from $9,622,730 ($0.21) in Q3 2024, reflecting lower operating expenses and scale benefits from the EPC project .
  • Sequentially, revenue jumped from $6,883,004 in Q2 to $30,602,588 in Q3, but profitability lagged as EPC revenue recognition precedes margin capture; management expects gross profit to “catch up” as milestones are completed .
  • No formal quantitative guidance was provided; management emphasized cost discipline and diversification, and highlighted the Longfellow contract as a foundation for sustained growth .
  • Street consensus estimates from S&P Global were unavailable for EPS and revenue; comparisons to estimates cannot be made (S&P Global data).

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Recognition of $24.1M EPC revenue from Longfellow BESS contract, validating strategic pivot to industrial projects and materially lifting total revenue to $30.6M .
  • Operating expense discipline: total operating expense declined to $3,064,440 vs $11,284,645 YoY as prior-year stock comp rolled off; G&A in U.S. fell to $2,753,000 from $3,517,000 .
  • Management tone constructive: “disciplined cost management, diversification across end markets, and the ramp of industrial projects is strengthening the foundation of our business,” with confidence gross profit will “catch up” as EPC milestones complete .

What Went Wrong

  • Gross margin compressed sharply to 3.1% (vs 19.9% YoY) due to accounting for uninstalled EPC materials at cost and higher unit costs in solar; Q3 gross profit fell to $956,208 from $1,257,339 YoY .
  • Core solar sales declined slightly YoY in Q3 (to $4,930,000 from $5,132,000) as systems completed fell 13.0% and wattage deployed fell 10.8%, reflecting ongoing NEM 3.0 headwinds .
  • China segment remains inactive with no revenue and ongoing geopolitical/trade uncertainties; management may discontinue the segment if profitability cannot be achieved .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2024Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD)$6,331,606 $6,883,004 $30,602,588
Gross Profit ($USD)$1,257,339 $604,561 $956,208
Gross Margin (%)19.9% 8.78%*3.12%*
EBITDA ($USD)$(1,213,816)*$(1,751,848)*$(2,095,312)*
EBITDA Margin (%)(19.17%)*(25.45%)*(6.85%)*
EBIT ($USD)$(10,027,306) $(1,768,694)*$(2,108,232)
EBIT Margin (%)(158.4%)*(25.70%)*(6.89%)*
Net Income ($USD)$(9,622,730) $(1,898,777)*$(2,258,104)
Diluted EPS ($)$(0.21) $(0.0414)*$(0.04)

Notes: * Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Segment revenue breakdown (US):

SegmentQ3 2024Q3 2025
Industrial EPC$0 $24,051,000
Solar Energy Sales$5,132,000 $4,930,000
LED Sales$1,110,000 $1,552,000
Financing$89,000 $70,000
Total Revenues$6,331,000 $30,603,000

Selected KPIs:

KPIQ3 2024Q3 2025Commentary
Overall Gross Margin (%)19.9% 3.1% EPC uninstalled materials recognized at cost; margin to follow with milestone completion .
Solar systems completed (YoY change)–(13.0%) Fewer system completions YoY in Q3.
Wattage deployed (YoY change)–(10.8%) Lower deployment YoY in Q3.
Battery sales (ex-system)$208,000 $126,000 Quarterly battery sales outside solar systems.
Longfellow BESS inventories procured–$23,200,000 Delivered to site but not installed; revenue recognized at cost .
AR from Longfellow–$9,900,000 Q3 balance.
Contract asset (Longfellow)–$9,700,000 Q3 balance.

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
RevenueFY 2025None provided None provided Maintained (no formal guidance)
Gross MarginFY 2025None provided None provided; expect margin “catch-up” as EPC milestones complete Maintained; qualitative commentary only
EPSFY 2025None provided None provided Maintained
OpexFY 2025None provided Continued discipline; lower YoY vs prior-year stock comp Qualitative improvement
Industrial EPC (Longfellow)Through Jun 2026N/AExpected total contract revenue ~$127,300,000; completion by June 2026 New visibility (contract signed late July 2025)

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

Note: No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript available for SMXT.

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 2025 & Q2 2025)Current Period (Q3 2025)Trend
Industrial EPC / Utility-scaleQ1: Building pipeline; no executed contracts yet . Q2: Announced $127.3M Texas BESS EPC contract; substantial top-line contributor over next four quarters .First EPC revenue recognized ($24.1M); inventories delivered, margin to follow .Accelerating execution; revenue begins, profit later.
Residential Solar (NEM 3.0)Q1: NEM 3.0 depresses CA demand; dealer network gaining traction . Q2: Market remains impacted; continued dealer traction .Solar sales down 3.9% YoY; systems completed –13%, wattage –10.8% .Persistent headwinds; selective growth via dealer network.
LEDQ1: Strategic initiatives to scale LED . Q2: LED part of diversification .LED revenue +39.8% YoY to $1.552M; higher-margin products .Improving mix and contribution.
Macro: Tariffs/InflationQ2: Profitability subject to inflation and tariffs .Risks reiterated; potential impact on EPC profitability .Ongoing external cost pressures.
China segmentLimited operations; legal recoveries in 2024 .No revenue; potential discontinuation considered .Unfavorable; likely de-emphasis.

Management Commentary

  • “Our third-quarter performance highlighted by the recognition of our first revenues from the Texas battery storage project... While the $24.1 million we recognized in the third quarter did not generate significant gross profit due to the accounting treatment... we expect gross profit to begin catching up with revenue as project milestones are completed.” — David Hsu, CEO .
  • “The combination of disciplined cost management, diversification across end markets, and the ramp of industrial projects is strengthening the foundation of our business.” — David Hsu, CEO .
  • Q1 framing of the environment: “We are encouraged... despite ongoing inflationary and regulatory pressures... California’s NEM 3.0... continues to impact residential solar demand... we’re seeing meaningful traction through our dealer network and proposed commercial projects.” — David Hsu, CEO .
  • Q2 strategic pivot: “This single project will contribute substantially to our top line over the next four quarters and validates our strategic shift toward large-scale commercial and utility-scale projects.” — David Hsu, CEO .

Q&A Highlights

  • No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript or Q&A was available for review (no transcript found).

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus estimates for Q3 2025 EPS and revenue were unavailable; consensus counts also unavailable (S&P Global data).
  • Actuals reported: Revenue $30,602,588 and diluted EPS $(0.04) .
  • Implication: Absent coverage, we cannot assess beats/misses vs Street; investors should anchor on contract execution milestones and margin trajectory as primary drivers (S&P Global data; filings cited above).

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Contract execution is the near-term narrative: EPC revenue recognition began ($24.1M), but margin recognition lags until installation/milestones complete; watch gross margin progression in Q4/Q1 .
  • Revenue mix shift lowers reported margins initially; expect step-up as uninstalled materials convert to installed assets with profit recognition .
  • Core solar remains challenged under NEM 3.0; dealer network helps but Q3 YoY declines in systems and wattage signal caution for residential volumes .
  • Cost discipline is tangible: opex down materially YoY as IPO-related stock comp rolled off; G&A percent of revenue fell significantly in Q3 .
  • China segment is a drag with no revenue and rising strategic uncertainty; probability rising that the segment will be discontinued if profitability cannot be achieved .
  • Balance sheet/capital needs: $5,000,000 equity contribution to Longfellow due by Dec 31, 2025; monitor cash and financing plans vs EPC working capital and inventories .
  • With no formal guidance or Street coverage, stock reactions likely tied to EPC milestone disclosures, gross margin progression, and additional contract wins (filings cited above; S&P Global estimates unavailable).