Sign in

Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) Q3 2026 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2025 revenue of $343M declined 19.6% YoY; GAAP diluted EPS was -$1.73, with $41M in restructuring/non-recurring charges, as reduced media spend and intensified Labor Day competition pressured demand .
  • The company amended and extended its bank agreement through 2027, easing covenant constraints and enabling reinvestment in growth initiatives (product simplification, brand repositioning, expanded distribution) starting in 2026 .
  • Guidance was lowered: FY2025 net sales to ~$1.4B (from ~$1.45B), gross margin to ~60% (from 61%), OpEx ex-restructuring to ~$825M (from ~$830M), and adjusted EBITDA to ~$70M with ~-$50M FCF; management expects better Q4 trends with slightly higher media spend vs Q2/Q3 and benefit from the 53rd week .
  • Key near-term catalysts: reinflated yet more efficient marketing into Q4, ongoing store footprint optimization, and early tests of new channels (e.g., HSN), offset by macro/tariff uncertainty and constrained consumer demand .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Gross margin resilience: 59.9% in Q3, +82 bps sequentially vs Q2, supported by mix and lower promotional activity despite unit deleverage .
  • Cost actions: Operating expenses (ex-restructuring) down 18% YoY in Q3; year-to-date working capital delivered ~$20M source of cash; capex reduced by ~$5M YoY .
  • Strategic reset momentum: Bank agreement extended to 2027 and management laid out 2026 growth plan centered on product simplification, brand messaging, and expanded distribution; “This is a full turnaround… positioned to execute the turnaround in 2026” — CEO Linda Findley .

What Went Wrong

  • Demand miss: Q3 sales fell short as 32% YoY media cuts in Q2/Q3 limited ability to counter aggressive holiday promotions; “competitive behaviors became even more aggressive… we did not have the financial flexibility to counter” — CEO .
  • Profitability compression: Adjusted EBITDA declined to $13.3M (3.9% margin), down ~52% YoY, reflecting lower sales and lost fixed-cost leverage .
  • Restructuring headwinds: $41M in Q3 restructuring/non-recurring charges (~$30M non-cash) tied to tech asset impairments and underperforming store closures, weighing GAAP EPS .

Financial Results

Sequential performance (Q1 → Q3 2025)

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD Millions)$393.3 $327.9 $342.9
Gross Profit Margin %61.2% 59.1% 59.9%
GAAP Diluted EPS ($)-0.38 -1.09 -1.73
Operating Income ($USD Millions)$1.9 -$0.1 -$40.3
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)$22.0 $23.6 $13.3
Adjusted EBITDA Margin %5.6% 7.2% 3.9%

Q3 YoY comparison

MetricQ3 2024Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD Millions)$426.6 $342.9
Gross Profit Margin %60.8% 59.9%
GAAP Diluted EPS ($)-0.14 -1.73
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)$27.7 $13.3

Estimates vs Actuals (S&P Global consensus)

MetricPeriodEstimate*Actual*Beat/Miss
Revenue ($USD)Q3 2025$362.48M*$342.88M*Miss*
Primary EPS ($)Q3 2025$0.14*-$0.38*Miss*
EBITDA ($USD)Q3 2025$31.4M*$12.37M*Miss*

Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

KPIs and Operating metrics

KPIQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Retail stores (% sales)87.6% 87.8% 87.8%
Online/phone/chat (% sales)12.4% 12.2% 12.2%
Retail comp store sales change-15% -18% -19%
Online/phone/chat sales change-12% -19% -20%
Stores open (end of period)637 630 611
Avg revenue per smart bed unit ($)$5,992 $5,880 $5,995
Avg sales per store (TTM, $000s)$2,495 $2,395 $2,276
Avg sales per sq ft (TTM, $)$807 $775 $735

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious Guidance (Q2 2025)Current Guidance (Q3 2025)Change
Net SalesFY2025~$1.45B ~$1.4B Lowered
Gross Profit Margin %FY2025~61% ~60% Lowered
OpEx (ex-restructuring)FY2025~$830M ~$825M Lowered
Adjusted EBITDA ($)FY2025Not provided~$70M New
Free Cash Flow ($)FY2025/H2Breakeven in H2 ~-$50M FY2025 Lowered

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2 2025)Current Period (Q3 2025)Trend
Marketing efficiency and spendAggressive cuts; rebuild for efficiency; targeted benefits messaging; aim to lower marketing % of sales Q4 media slightly down YoY vs Q4’24 (not -30% like Q2/Q3); efficiency gains with 6% lower CPA; reinvesting under new covenants Improving efficiency; spend cautiously rising
Distribution/channel strategy“Everything on the table”; explore digital-first partnerships; evaluate store fleet Test on HSN; selective partnerships; optimize store footprint with closures/transfer rates Expanding channels; rationalizing stores
Product lineup and pricingSimplify assortment; add accessible premium price points; drive ARU via mix/promotions Early 2026 refresh; focus on comfort, durability, total value; premium positioning maintained Execution in 2026; positioning refined
Tariffs/supply chainTariff impact modeled and mitigated via sourcing/price; GM protection targeted GM benefited from lower promo/mix; tariff comments less central; prior mitigation reiterated Managed; watch policy changes
Capital structure/covenantsActive lender dialogue; aim for flexibility; non-dilutive options Bank agreement amended/extended to 2027; covenants aligned with turnaround Improved flexibility
Customer/brand validationClimate beds/ARU support; tech/data differentiation JD Power #1 satisfaction (Nov’25) reinforces brand strength Positive validation

Management Commentary

  • “This is a full turnaround of an inherently great company… we are optimistic that this work positions us to execute the turnaround in 2026.” — CEO Linda Findley .
  • “Gross profit margin was 59.9%, down 93 bps YoY, but up 82 bps from Q2… driven primarily by unit volume deleverage, partially offset by favorable mix and lower promotional activity.” — Interim CFO Bob Ryder .
  • “We successfully executed an amendment and extension of our bank agreement, extending maturity to the end of 2027… providing flexibility to invest in specific parts of the business with strong returns.” — Interim CFO .
  • “Next week, we will host a show on HSN with an exclusive bed as part of an ongoing testing of channel opportunities.” — CEO .

Q&A Highlights

  • Restructuring charges: $30M of Q3 charges were non-cash (tech asset write-offs and store closures); 2025 FCF guidance (-$50M) includes expected cash charges; 2026 restructuring cash not guided but covenants set maxima .
  • Marketing trajectory: Q2/Q3 media down ~32% YoY constrained by covenants; Q4 media only slightly down YoY with pipeline-building spend beyond in-quarter payback under amended agreement .
  • Store fleet strategy: High transfer rates when closing underperforming stores; consolidation to highest-performing locations to lower fixed costs .
  • Distribution expansion: HSN test plus other non-traditional, value-add channels to supplement vertical model without cannibalization .
  • Covenants/interest: Leverage ratio 5.0x EBITDAR at Q3 end vs covenant max 5.25x; covenants/fees/interest reset (details in 8-K) .

Estimates Context

  • Q3 2025 consensus expected revenue ~$362.5M* vs actual ~$342.9M* (miss); consensus Primary EPS $0.14* vs actual -$0.38* (miss); consensus EBITDA ~$31.4M* vs actual ~$12.37M* (miss). Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
  • FY2025 consensus revenue $1.396B* aligns with lowered guidance ($1.4B), implying estimates likely to drift down on margin and FCF after guidance reset. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Near-term set-up: Q4 should show modest sequential improvement on less severe media cuts and benefit from 53rd week, but absolute demand remains pressured; watch holiday elasticity and promo intensity .
  • Turnaround path: 2026 growth thesis centers on simplified premium product line, clearer value messaging, and new distribution channels; visibility improves as tests (e.g., HSN) scale .
  • Balance sheet risk moderated: 2027 extension provides operational runway; covenant headroom (5.0x vs 5.25x) supports planned reinvestment .
  • Cost discipline intact: OpEx ex-restructuring trending down; fixed-cost reductions and store rationalization a tailwind to EBITDA/FCF on any top-line stabilization .
  • Watch non-GAAP vs GAAP: Significant restructuring/non-recurring items distort GAAP EPS; adjusted EBITDA context and free cash flow trajectory critical for equity/debt debates .
  • Brand strength intact: JD Power recognition underscores product/experience differentiation, supporting medium-term repositioning and conversion efforts .
  • Risk factors: Consumer softness, tariff policy shifts, competitive promotional intensity, and execution timing of product refresh/distribution expansion .

Notes: All figures reflect Q3 2025 (quarter ended September 27, 2025). Values retrieved from S&P Global for consensus-related data.*

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%