Sign in

Samuel Hellfeld

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Risk Officer and Secretary at SNBR
Executive

About Samuel Hellfeld

Samuel R. Hellfeld is Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Risk Officer and Secretary at Sleep Number, age 46; he joined in 2013 and was promoted to his current role in March 2022, leading legal, internal audit, corporate security and asset protection . Company performance during his recent tenure reflects a challenging industry backdrop: in 2024 net sales were $1.7B (-11% YoY) and adjusted EBITDA $119.6M (-6% YoY), with operating expense reductions of $85.7M . Sleep Number’s TSR over 2020–2023 moved from $166 to $30 per $100 initial investment, underscoring severe equity drawdown amid the downturn .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Sleep NumberEVP, Chief Legal & Risk Officer and SecretaryMar 2022–presentLeads legal, internal audit, corporate security and asset protection
Sleep NumberSVP, Chief Legal & Risk OfficerSep 2018–Mar 2022Enterprise risk oversight and legal leadership
Sleep NumberVP, Associate General CounselOct 2015–Sep 2018Advanced corporate legal support
Sleep NumberCorporate CounselMar 2013–Oct 2015Joined company legal team

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Fox Rothschild LLP (fka Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP)Partner (IP and litigation)pre-2013IP and litigation expertise leveraged into corporate legal leadership
U.S. Court of Appeals (9th Cir.)Law Clerkprior to 2010Federal appellate clerkship experience
U.S. District Court (S.D. Cal.)Law Clerkprior to 2010Federal trial-level clerkship experience

Fixed Compensation

Multi-year summary compensation for Mr. Hellfeld:

Metric202220232024
Salary ($)488,115 519,231 542,265
Non-Equity Incentive (AIP) ($)89,856 226,992
Stock Awards ($)714,639 685,817 519,552
Option Awards ($)196,101 232,112
All Other Compensation ($)18,394 20,243 19,484
Total ($)1,417,249 1,547,259 1,308,293

Notes:

  • 2024 base salary annualized was increased to $549,938 effective April 14, 2024 .
  • The company eliminated stock option grants for executives in 2024 to conserve shares .

Performance Compensation

Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) design and 2024 payout:

ElementThresholdTargetMaximumActual 2024Payout & Vesting
Adjusted EBITDA Goal ($M)$109.0 $141.0 $183.0 $119.6 49.8% of target (pre-modifier); paid after FY
Shared Strategic Objective Modifier100–125% scale $139.1M benefits → 120% modifier Final AIP payout 59.8% of target

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTI) 2024 structure and grants to Mr. Hellfeld:

Grant TypeDesignTarget/Grant DetailVesting
PSUsAnnual growth in net sales and NOP over FY 2024–2026; average of yearly net sales/NOP results; ROIC-WACC modifier can reduce payout up to 20% Target PSUs 16,674 (threshold 1,384; max 33,348); grant-date fair value $225,599 Cliff vests at 3 years (subject to performance)
RSUsTime-based equity21,726 RSUs; grant-date fair value $293,953 3 equal annual installments over 3 years
Special RSURecognition grant$125,000 RSUs in addition to annual LTI 3-year ratable vesting

Historical PSU outcomes for reference:

  • 2021 PSU (FY 2021–2023): 43.1% of target payout company-wide; Mr. Hellfeld’s 2021 PSUs vested March 15, 2024 .
  • 2022 PSU (FY 2022–2024): 0% payout company-wide; vested March 15, 2025 with no payout .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Ownership ItemValue
Beneficial ownership (common shares)74,494 shares; <1% outstanding
Options exercisable within 60 days37,493 shares
RSUs vesting within 60 days9,562 shares
Stock ownership guidelinesExecutives must hold 3x salary; must hold 50% of net shares until guideline met
Hedging/pledging policyProhibited for insiders (no hedging, short sales, options, or pledging/margin)

Observations:

  • RSUs vest ratably over three years, creating predictable supply; the hold requirement until guideline compliance reduces near-term selling pressure .
  • Most outstanding options have exercise prices well above the 12/27/2024 share price of $15.20, limiting near-term monetization (e.g., many option strikes ≥$28.41) .

Employment Terms

ProvisionTerms
Severance (no change-in-control)1× base salary + target AIP; example value $905,000; COBRA reimbursement (e.g., $17,180)
Severance (following change-in-control)2× base salary + target AIP; example cash $1,797,500; double-trigger vesting applies; stock award acceleration example $551,587
Change-in-control equityDouble-trigger vesting if awards assumed/substituted; acceleration on involuntary termination without cause/for good reason within 2 years
ClawbackNasdaq-compliant clawback for Section 16 officers; forfeiture on confidentiality violations in LTI agreements
Non-compete/Non-solicit/ConfidentialityRequired as a condition of LTI awards; includes assignment of inventions and arbitration agreements

Additional Governance & Compensation Context

  • Say-on-Pay approvals: 82.7% (2024 meeting), down from five-year average 88.9% ; 74.3% in 2023 .
  • Peer group benchmarking: Updated peer set in 2024–2025 to reflect size and strategy; changes included adding Havertys (2025) and removing Conn’s post-bankruptcy .
  • Pay governance best practices: No tax gross-ups (except relocation), double-trigger CoC vesting, no option repricing, robust ownership guidelines, hedging/pledging prohibitions .

Investment Implications

  • Pay-for-performance alignment: 2024 AIP paid 59.8% of target as EBITDA missed plan but operational benefit targets exceeded; 2022 PSUs paid 0%—signals disciplined linkage to outcomes, mitigating windfalls in downturns .
  • Retention vs dilution: Shift from options to RSUs/PSUs in 2024 lowers dilution but increases guaranteed time-based vesting; holding requirements and clawbacks support alignment and reduce selling pressure .
  • Ownership/skin-in-the-game: Beneficial ownership (<1%) with meaningful unexercisable options and multi-year RSUs; pledging/hedging bans and hold requirements enhance alignment despite stock drawdown .
  • Change-in-control economics: Double-trigger design and 2× cash severance (post-CoC) offer retention and continuity; equity acceleration terms are standard but not overly generous vs peers .
  • Execution risk: Legal/risk leadership coincides with industry trough and leverage/covenant sensitivity; continued cost reductions and governance reforms are prioritized, but TSR and revenue/EBITDA trends reflect macro headwinds .

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%