SO
Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 showed ongoing pre-revenue operations and a sizeable net loss as the company pivots from a delayed California pipeline restart to a federally permitted OS&T solution; net loss was $110.4M as restart-related OpEx and non-cash interest outweighed a non-cash warrant liability gain .
- Management formally prioritized OS&T, targeting vessel purchase in Q1 2026 and first oil sales in Q4 2026; OS&T is expected to lower costs by roughly $10/BOE vs the onshore pipeline pathway due to lower LOE and better marketing optionality .
- Balance sheet/timing pressure is elevated near term: amendment of the Exxon term loan requires $225M of common equity to extend maturity (to Mar 31, 2027 or 90 days post first sales) and increases PIK interest to 15% with a $25M minimum cash covenant; mgmt targets ~$25M/month cash burn (ex capex) until first sales .
- EPS missed consensus as losses persisted with no commercial sales; the strategic pivot, financing path (debt + equity) and permitting cadence are the key stock catalysts into 2026, along with any clarity on OSFM disputes and federal approvals .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- OS&T pivot accelerates path to monetization with structural cost advantages: “initial projections show a potential cost savings of approximately $10 per barrel compared to the estimated cost associated with operating the onshore infrastructure” .
- Federal process momentum: Management cited proactive engagement with BOEM/BSEE and coordination with Commerce on CZMA issues; goal is to secure clearances to proceed and line up project financing as early as January .
- Term loan amendment and roadmap: Company outlined a comprehensive refinancing to take out the Exxon term loan, fund OS&T capex and operating burn through first sales; plan anticipates federal credit support to improve economics .
What Went Wrong
- No commercial sales and EPS miss: With continued absence of revenue, EPS missed S&P Global consensus as operating and non-cash interest costs persisted (see Estimates Context). Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- California pipeline restart delayed amid OSFM dispute; mgmt alleges the agency shifted interpretation of waiver requirements; a special committee is also reviewing separate external allegations (Hunterbrook) .
- Liquidity compression: Cash fell to $41.6M at quarter-end from $247.1M in Q2, while reported short-term debt rose to $896.6M; higher 15% PIK post-amendment raises carrying cost until first sales .
Financial Results
Company remains pre-revenue pending offtake approvals; tables present reported results and S&P Global metrics where applicable.
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Q3 vs S&P Global consensus (Wall Street):
- EPS: Actual -$1.46 vs Consensus -$0.86 → bold miss of -$0.60. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Revenue: Consensus $0; company disclosed no commercial sales; NA actual. Values retrieved from S&P Global and company disclosures .
KPIs and operating context:
- Oil into storage: ~130,000 bbl flowed in Q2; cumulative ~350,000 bbl as of Aug 8, 2025 (within Q3) .
- Shares outstanding: 89.34M (Q1), 99.48M (Q2), 99.51M (Q3) .
- Monthly cash burn target (ex capex): ~$25M (guidance) .
Segment breakdown: Sable operates a single asset base (SYU) with wholly owned LFC infrastructure; no commercial sales recognized in the period .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We believe that delays to the Las Flores pipeline restart have been unfair… This has led Sable to fully evaluate and pursue an accelerated OS&T strategy… initial projections show a potential cost savings of approximately $10 per barrel” .
- “Comprehensive debt refinancing… would refinance the Exxon term loan… fund the business through 2026 through first sales… and the capital required to both purchase and modify the OS&T” .
- On permits: “Our permit is kinda cruising through the DOI… they think they can get this done this year… hopefully we’d be able to take Exxon out in January” .
- On operations: “We’re engineering the OS&T in island mode… enough power generation capacity… we can do it offshore and continue to produce and sell offshore” .
- On California vs federal processes: “It’s been a lot more fun calling East than calling West over Sacramento” .
Q&A Highlights
- Financing path: Comprehensive refinancing to take out Exxon term loan; covers LOE, G&A and OS&T purchase/mods through first sales; amendment lifts PIK rate to 15%, imposes ≥$25M minimum cash; maturity extends to Mar 31, 2027 or 90 days post first sales contingent on ≥$225M common equity .
- Cash discipline: Targeting ~$25M/month cash burn ex capex; contractor demobilization and staffing adjustments drive reduction vs recent levels .
- Capex/asset plan: Intend to acquire OS&T (vs lease) opportunistically; can structure lease later; plan for all three platforms ready to ramp quickly post-first sales .
- Regulatory/timeline: Working with BOEM/BSEE and Commerce; seeking expedited federal clearances; OSFM dispute ongoing; OS&T viewed as executable plan vs uncertain state approvals .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 EPS came in below consensus: Actual -$1.46 vs -$0.86 consensus (miss -$0.60). With no commercial sales, revenue remains NA while consensus expected $0. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Forward models likely adjust to: (i) shift first sales from 2025 to Q4 2026; (ii) incorporate higher PIK interest (15%) and minimum cash covenant; (iii) add ≥$225M equity raise and OS&T capex ($425–$475M in FY26), partially offset by structurally lower run-rate costs post sales .
- Net effect: Larger losses through 2026, lower steady-state unit costs and improved Brent realization post-sales, with dilution risk from required equity and timing risk tied to federal approvals. Values retrieved from S&P Global; company guidance cited.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution shifted decisively to OS&T with a clear critical path: federal approvals → refinancing/equity → vessel purchase/mods → Q4 2026 sales; this path reduces exposure to California state-level delays .
- Pre-sales cash burn (~$25M/month ex capex) and 15% PIK interest intensify liquidity pressure; equity capital is a gating item to extend maturity and de-risk execution .
- Structural economics improve post-sales vs pipeline: ~$10/BOE cost advantage, lower GP&T and Brent-linked marketing optionality could lift long-run margins and free cash conversion once volumes flow .
- Near-term estimate risk is to the downside (losses, no revenue) until 2026; medium-term models should reflect faster multi-platform ramp and lower unit costs, contingent on permitting and financing .
- Regulatory overhang persists (OSFM letter, Coastal Commission history), but federal pathway (BOEM/BSEE, possible Commerce override) appears constructive; monitoring cadence of federal milestones is key .
- Governance/news risk: Special Committee review of external allegations adds headline volatility; outcome and disclosures could affect financing terms and investor confidence .
- Trading setup: Shares likely trade on permitting and financing milestones rather than fundamentals until first sales; positive inflections would be federal clearance, signed financing, and OS&T procurement.
Notes:
- Where marked with an asterisk (*), values are retrieved from S&P Global.
- Company disclosures indicate no commercial sales in the quarter; revenue not recognized during the period .
Citations:
- Q3 results press release and 8-K:
- Strategic update 8-K and investor presentation:
- Q2 results 8-K:
- Q1 results 8-K:
- OSFM correspondence 8-K:
- Strategic update call transcript: