SH
Sotherly Hotels Inc. (SOHO)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue was $48.31M, up 3.8% YoY and above S&P Global consensus by ~$0.91M; Hotel EBITDA rose 4.5% YoY while Adjusted FFO fell 12.8% YoY, reflecting higher interest costs and non-GAAP items . Revenue beat: $48.31M vs $47.40M estimate (1 estimate) – small positive surprise. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Management reiterated full‑year 2025 guidance (revenues $183.4–$188.2M; Hotel EBITDA $48.8–$49.6M; Adj. FFO $11.5–$12.3M; RevPAR $119.77–$122.89; Hotel EBITDA margin 26.1%–26.4%), signaling stable outlook despite macro caution .
- Operating momentum was driven by occupancy gains, especially in urban markets (Philadelphia, Houston, Atlanta); ADR stabilized after sequential declines, supporting flow‑through and margin expansion; storm‑impacted Tampa (Hotel Alba) largely offset by business interruption insurance .
- Balance sheet: $32.8M cash (incl. $21.3M restricted), $317.6M debt at 5.88% WAC; near‑term maturities in Atlanta and Hollywood likely addressed via CMBS extensions/modifications; potential to tap $20–$30M equity from Savannah/Wilmington to support refinancing .
- Tactical catalysts: imminent reverse split (target July–August) to cure NASDAQ $1 bid deficiency; execution of PIP renovations ($11.5M Philadelphia; $14.6M Jacksonville) could improve rate capture and asset competitiveness .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “Overall, we delivered a solid first quarter with results ahead of our internal expectations” as urban markets strengthened; ADR stabilized across top business/group markets .
- Property outperformance: DoubleTree Philadelphia (+34.3% RevPAR; +38.7% occupancy), Whitehall Houston (+19.4% RevPAR; +20.5% occupancy), Hollywood Beach Resort (+11.9% RevPAR; +11.8% occupancy), Ballast Wilmington (+6.5% RevPAR) .
- Margin tailwinds: portfolio Hotel EBITDA +9.4% YoY excluding a prior‑year $550K grant; ~100 bps Hotel EBITDA margin improvement; management expects margins to remain stable as wage pressures ease .
-
What Went Wrong
- Adj. FFO declined 12.8% YoY ($4.52M vs $5.18M) due to higher interest and non‑GAAP adjustments, despite top‑line growth; rate growth remains an industry challenge .
- Macro caution: weakened consumer sentiment, compressed booking windows; government segment demand pulled back in D.C.; pauses in group lead conversions late March–April .
- Financing headwinds: tighter underwriting, higher DSCR requirements and lower proceeds for CMBS refinancings (Atlanta, Hollywood) – likely resolved via extensions/mods; preferred dividends remain 11 quarters in arrears (~$21.9M accrued) .
Financial Results
Revenue vs Estimates
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Year-over-Year (Q1)
Selected Property KPIs (Q1 2025 YoY)
Non‑GAAP and One‑time items (Q1): Gain on involuntary conversion $3.87M recognized; BI insurance proceeds support reported revenue/EBITDA while headline ADR/RevPAR reflect pre‑insurance operations .
Guidance Changes
Dividend‑related: Preferred series cash dividends declared Apr‑29 ($0.50 B; $0.492188 C; $0.515625 D) payable Jun‑16 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We were very pleased with our first quarter results, which came in ahead of expectations… continued occupancy recovery in our urban markets… ADR held flat year‑over‑year… translated into healthy margin performance” – CEO David Folsom .
- “Hotel EBITDA across our entire portfolio increased 4.5%… excluding a $550,000 COVID‑related grant last year, Hotel EBITDA increased a healthy 9.4%… ~100 bps increase in Hotel EBITDA margins” – COO Scott Kucinski .
- “We are reiterating our full year guidance for 2025… Total revenue $183.4M–$188.2M… Hotel EBITDA $48.8M–$49.6M… Adjusted FFO $11.5M–$12.3M or $0.57–$0.61 per share” – CFO Anthony Domalski .
- Macro caution: “Consumer sentiment has weakened… increased price sensitivity and compressed booking windows… government segment… pullback” – CEO .
- PIP execution: “10‑year franchise [Hilton]… DoubleTree Philadelphia PIP budget $11.5M… Jacksonville reposition to Hotel Bellamy with $14.6M renovation” – COO .
Q&A Highlights
- Reverse split timing: execution likely in July/August to meet August 11 deadline; legal/documentation work underway .
- Tampa BI insurance: hotel EBITDA “pretty much made whole” (~95%); BI proceeds ~$100K–$200K in the quarter; Alba RevPAR $180.57, slightly above prior year .
- Refinancing plan: Atlanta and Hollywood CMBS maturities most likely addressed via 1–2 year extensions/modifications; expect higher rates, tighter underwriting, special servicing fees .
- Liquidity strategy: potential to refinance Savannah and Wilmington conventionally, extracting $20–$30M cash to support refinancing/extensions elsewhere .
- Preferred dividends accrual: ~$21.9M accrued; 11 quarters behind; making current payments on preferreds .
Estimates Context
- Revenue v. consensus: Q1 2025 beat by ~$0.91M (Actual $48.31M vs Estimate $47.40M; 1 estimate); Q4 2024 beat by ~$1.15M; Q3 2024 missed by ~$1.30M. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- EPS consensus: Unavailable via S&P Global for the quarters reviewed; reliance on reported diluted EPS.
- Implication: Low estimate count (n=1) reduces signal quality; nonetheless, recurring small revenue beats in Q4/Q1 align with occupancy‑driven momentum and BI insurance smoothing effects .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q1 demonstrated occupancy‑led outperformance with ADR stabilization; modest revenue beat and margin improvement support a constructive near‑term view despite Adj. FFO pressure from higher interest costs .
- Guidance reiteration and healthy booking trends (RevPAR forecast 103%–105% of 2024) underpin 2025 stability; watch for second‑half caution around government demand and group conversion pacing .
- Near‑term maturities likely addressed via CMBS extensions/mods; management has multiple levers (Savannah/Wilmington equity refi) to buttress liquidity; monitor terms (rates, fees, amortization) and impact on FFO .
- Asset upgrades (Philadelphia PIP; Jacksonville reposition) are potential catalysts for rate capture and comp‑set outperformance; expect incremental benefits as projects progress through 2026–2027 .
- Reverse split is a procedural catalyst to cure NASDAQ deficiency; execution (Jul/Aug) reduces listing risk and may broaden investor access .
- Preferred dividends: current payments continue, but accrued balance remains large; equity holders should factor the capital allocation and refinancing path to reduce leverage over time .
- Tactical positioning: momentum in urban/group assets and BI insurance tailwinds favor near‑term operations; risk‑watch on macro sensitivity (ADR recovery pace, government segment), refinancing outcomes, and second‑half demand volatility .
Notes:
- All document-based figures and quotes are cited inline.
- S&P Global consensus values marked with * and provided where available; EPS consensus was unavailable.