Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

ST

Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (SPRO)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • PIVOT-PO Phase 3 for tebipenem HBr (oral carbapenem for cUTI) met its primary endpoint and was stopped early for efficacy (1,690 patients); GSK plans to include data in a U.S. FDA filing in 2H 2025; management expects FDA action likely in 2026 .
  • Q2 delivered strong operating leverage: revenue rose to $14.189M (+39% YoY) on higher GSK collaboration revenue; net loss narrowed to $(1.7)M with EPS of $(0.03), versus $(0.33) a year ago .
  • Cash runway extended materially “into 2028” due to trial cost savings from early stop and milestone receipts from GSK; cash and equivalents were $31.2M at quarter-end, with a final $23.8M earned milestone received in August 2025 .
  • Estimates context: EPS beat meaningfully vs S&P Global consensus (Actual $(0.03) vs $(0.38)); revenue had no meaningful consensus coverage (one estimate showing $0); catalysts ahead include full data disclosure, NDA submission in 2H 2025, and 2026 FDA action potential . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Early-stop Phase 3 success de-risks the lead asset: “met its primary endpoint… and was stopped early for efficacy,” with no new safety concerns (diarrhea, headache most frequent AEs) .
  • Operating leverage and narrowed loss: revenue increased to $14.2M (from $10.2M), while R&D fell to $10.7M (from $23.7M) as PIVOT-PO costs declined; net loss improved to $(1.7)M (from $(17.9)M) .
  • Balance sheet visibility: runway extended into 2028; management highlighted cost savings from early stop and non‑contingent GSK milestones supporting the runway .

Management quotes:

  • “PIVOT-PO… successfully met its primary endpoint and was stopped early for efficacy… GSK… plan to… include the PIVOT-PO data as part of an FDA filing at year end 2025.”
  • “There remains a critical unmet need for an oral carbapenem… If approved, we believe tebipenem HBr could set a new standard of care…” .

What Went Wrong

  • Reduced future first-sale commercial milestone potential (contingent) adjusted to up to $101M (from up to $150M) given early stop reduced total enrollment; other milestones unchanged .
  • SPR720 uncertainty persists after Phase 2a oral program was suspended due to lack of efficacy separation and dose-limiting hepatotoxicity; next steps under evaluation .
  • Limited Street coverage: one-estimate coverage and zero revenue consensus complicates standard “beat/miss” framing for revenue; underscores micro-cap coverage constraints [GetEstimates].

Financial Results

Sequential Trend (oldest → newest)

MetricQ4 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025
Total Revenues ($USD Millions)$15.044 $5.874 $14.189
Loss from Operations ($USD Millions)$(21.725) $(14.731) $(2.444)
Net Loss ($USD Millions)$(20.888) $(13.866) $(1.700)
Diluted EPS ($)$(0.38) $(0.25) $(0.03)
R&D Expense ($USD Millions)$28.836 $13.606 $10.672
G&A Expense ($USD Millions)$7.056 $6.824 $5.878

YoY Comparison (Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024)

MetricQ2 2024Q2 2025
Total Revenues ($USD Millions)$10.197 $14.189
Net Loss ($USD Millions)$(17.862) $(1.700)
Diluted EPS ($)$(0.33) $(0.03)
R&D Expense ($USD Millions)$23.725 $10.672
G&A Expense ($USD Millions)$5.533 $5.878

Q2 2025 Actual vs S&P Global Consensus

MetricActualConsensusSurprise
Revenue ($USD Millions)$14.189 $0.000*— (no meaningful coverage)*
Diluted EPS ($)$(0.03) $(0.38)*+$0.35 (Beat)

Values retrieved from S&P Global*.

Revenue Components (oldest → newest)

Revenue Component ($USD Millions)Q2 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025
Grant Revenue$4.180 $0.763 $2.387
Collaboration Revenue – Related Party$5.903 $5.099 $11.802
Collaboration Revenue – Other$0.114 $0.012 $0.000
Total Revenues$10.197 $5.874 $14.189

KPIs (oldest → newest)

KPIQ4 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025
Cash & Equivalents ($USD Millions)$52.889 $48.887 $31.194
Runway GuidanceInto Q2 2026 Into Q2 2026 Into 2028
PIVOT-PO Enrollment at Interim1,690 patients

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Cash RunwayMulti-yearInto Q2 2026 (Q4’24/Q1’25) Into 2028 (Q2’25) Raised (extended)
NDA Submission (tebipenem HBr)20252H 2025 (post-interim success) 2H 2025 reaffirmed Maintained
FDA Action Timing2026Not specified“Likely in 2026” (mgmt expectation) New specificity
First-Sale Commercial MilestonesEvent-drivenUp to $150M (structure pre-early stop) Up to $101M (after early stop) Lowered
Total Potential Milestones (all types)Multi-yearUp to ~$351M (regulatory, commercial, sales) Unchanged Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q4 2024)Previous Mentions (Q1 2025)Current Period (Q2 2025)Trend
Tebipenem HBr Phase 3 statusInterim analysis expected Q2’25; top priority Interim analysis in Q2’25; ongoing Met endpoint; early stop for efficacy; no new safety signals Positive inflection
Regulatory timelinePreparing for interim; path under SPA Interim in Q2’25 GSK to file in 2H’25; mgmt expects 2026 action Clearer timeline
Cash runwayInto Q2 2026 Into Q2 2026 Into 2028 (cost savings + milestones) Improved
SPR720Interim showed no separation; safety concerns; assessing data Analysis of all 25 patients; next steps TBD Oral program suspended; next steps TBD Cautious
GSK deal economicsUp to ~$400M milestones referenced (earlier materials) First-sale commercial milestones adjusted to up to $101M; other milestones unchanged Mixed (structure revised)
Macro/health system impactcUTI burden: 2.9M U.S. episodes; $6B+ costs; oral option could reduce resource use Reinforced value prop

Management Commentary

  • “The PIVOT-PO trial… met its primary endpoint and was stopped early for efficacy… [and] did not identify any new safety concerns…” .
  • “GSK… plan to work with the FDA to include the PIVOT-PO data as part of an FDA filing at year end 2025. We currently believe that FDA action is likely in 2026.” .
  • “With the trial stopping early for efficacy, we have achieved meaningful cost savings… which we anticipate will extend our cash runway into 2028.” .
  • “Total revenue… was $14.2 million… primarily due to collaboration revenue from GSK… R&D… $10.7 million… decrease… due to reduced clinical expenses related to the PIVOT-PO trial.” .

Q&A Highlights

  • Capital allocation and BD vs pipeline: Management prioritized ensuring tebipenem HBr reaches regulatory approval as the primary value driver; capital deployment decisions to follow once there is line of sight to approval .

Estimates Context

  • Q2 2025 EPS: Actual $(0.03) vs S&P Global consensus $(0.38)* → Beat by $0.35, driven by higher collaboration revenue and lower trial costs as PIVOT-PO stopped early . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
  • Q2 2025 Revenue: Actual $14.189M vs limited consensus coverage (one estimate at $0.0); collaboration revenue from GSK was $11.802M . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
  • Coverage depth: one estimate for both revenue and EPS across recent quarters, limiting traditional consensus analytics [GetEstimates].

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Clinical de-risking: Early-stop Phase 3 success meaningfully increases the probability of approval; SPA framework further supports approvability .
  • Clear regulatory path: GSK plans an FDA filing in 2H 2025; management expects potential 2026 action—key stock catalysts include full data disclosure and NDA submission .
  • Operating leverage evidence: Collaboration revenue strength and reduced R&D drove a large EPS beat vs S&P consensus in Q2 . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
  • Balance sheet extended: Runway into 2028 lowers financing risk through key milestones; supports holding into regulatory events .
  • Economics intact despite milestone re-cut: First-sale commercial milestone opportunity reduced to up to $101M (from up to $150M), but total milestone and royalty framework remains compelling, with up to ~$351M potential plus tiered royalties .
  • Risk factors: SPR720 path remains uncertain; reliance on partner execution (GSK) and regulatory outcomes persists .
  • Trading setup: Near-term data presentation and NDA submission are likely narrative drivers; 2026 FDA decision is the pivotal event.

Notes:

  • All financial figures are from company press releases/filings/transcripts as cited.
  • Asterisked estimate figures are from S&P Global consensus and may reflect limited coverage; Values retrieved from S&P Global*.