SRE Q2 2025: KKR LOI Targets 15–30% Stake Sale to Bolster Credit
- Incremental Capital Opportunities in Texas: Sempra is positioned to capture additional growth with incremental capital spending of about $12 billion beyond its existing $36 billion base plan, driven by strong legislative support, robust permitting, and clear guidance to expand its Texas investments.
- Advancing LNG Business: The rapid progress on Port Arthur LNG Phase II—including securing a 20-year SPA with JERA, obtaining key permits, and advancing financing efforts—bolsters its LNG portfolio and positions Sempra to benefit from favorable macro LNG market trends.
- Favorable Regulatory Developments: The introduction of regulatory initiatives like House Bill 5,247 and the upcoming UTM filings are expected to enhance on a regulated basis Sempra’s earnings profile by improving the earned ROE by 50–100 basis points over time, supporting a stronger credit profile.
- Uncertain Capital Expansion and Execution Risks: There is concern over the timing and successful execution of an incremental $12,000,000,000 increase in Encore's capital plan, with uncertainties surrounding the update process and potential strain from rising CapEx levels outside the current plan.
- Transaction Timing and Equity Sale Uncertainty: The nonbinding LOI with KKR for Sempra Infrastructure leaves open questions regarding the actual stake sale (targeted between 15% and 30%, possibly higher) and the timing of finalizing a definitive agreement, which could adversely affect future capital recycling and balance sheet strength.
- Regulatory and Policy Uncertainty Impacting Costs: Ongoing questions about wildfire legislation and affordability bills indicate potential regulatory headwinds, where delays or unfavorable policy outcomes could raise costs and negatively affect customer affordability initiatives.
Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
---|---|---|---|
Capital Investment and Expansion | In Q4 2024, discussions focused on a record $56 billion capital plan with significant roll‐forward increases for Texas and Oncor, with details on projects like transmission and resiliency investments. In Q3 2024, the emphasis was on Oncor’s $24 billion capital plan and incremental increases (up to an additional $12 billion) driven by growth in Texas along with addressing permitting and transmission needs. | In Q2 2025, the focus is on incremental CapEx in Texas and Oncor including a $36 billion five‐year capital plan and assessments of an additional $12 billion tied to legislative developments, permitting progress, and strong growth drivers in Texas. | Consistent emphasis on robust capital expenditure plans, with the current period offering a more granular view of incremental opportunities and execution risks amid continued Texas growth. |
LNG Business Expansion | Q4 2024 discussions detailed progress on Port Arthur LNG Phase 1 and Phase 2, highlighting partnerships with Aramco, EPC agreements, and the expected FID in 2025. In Q3 2024, the focus was on Phase 2 progress with Saudi Aramco as an anchor partner, ongoing commercial discussions and permitting issues. | Q2 2025 highlights steady progress: Phase I construction is more than 50% complete, and Phase II has secured all major permits including a long-term 20‑year SPA with JERA. The market outlook is optimistic with emphasis on energy security and efficient LNG positioning in global markets. | The narrative remains focused on LNG expansion, but there is a shift from an Aramco-centric discussion to new long-term SPAs with JERA, reflecting evolving partnership dynamics while overall progress remains steady. |
Regulatory Environment Dynamics | In Q4 2024 the conversation included detailed discussion on specific regulatory cases such as the California rate case, FERC decisions (including CAISO adder issues), and bills like HB 2668, along with region-specific measures and challenges. In Q3 2024, emphasis was placed on California’s GRC details and supporting measures in Texas such as permitting improvements. | Q2 2025 presents a broader regulatory narrative: while still noting policy uncertainties (wildfire legislation and California rate cases), it highlights favorable Texas legislative initiatives (e.g. House Bill 5247 and UTM filings) and a focus on strengthening regulatory compacts and capital execution strategies. | There is a clear shift from discussing region-specific regulatory challenges to a wider emphasis on overall regulatory frameworks and execution factors, particularly leveraging positive Texas developments. |
Equity and Funding Concerns | In Q4 2024, the focus was on the established $3 billion ATM program, asset sales (especially Mexican assets), and a balanced financing strategy to support a large capital plan, with discussions on maintaining strong credit metrics. Q3 2024 similarly focused on the ATM equity program as a flexible funding tool without mentioning major strategic partnerships. | In Q2 2025, the narrative changes to emphasize a potential KKR deal for an equity sale, targeting a range between 15% and 30% ownership, with discussions on its potential benefits for EPS, credit profile, and deconsolidation, marking a strategic shift from the earlier ATM program focus. | The focus evolved from relying on ATM-based equity programs to exploring strategic equity sales (via the KKR deal), reflecting evolving dilution risks and changing transaction timing dynamics. |
EPS Growth Outlook vs. Near-Term Dilution | Q4 2024 emphasized strong long-term EPS growth targets (with a revised full-year 2025 EPS guidance) while noting near-term pressures from regulatory outcomes and increased capital expenditures. In Q3 2024, the narrative highlighted a 6%–8% EPS growth outlook supported by strategic financing (including the ATM program), balanced against dilution concerns. | Q2 2025 reaffirms long-term EPS growth guidance (with targets for 2025 and 2026) but also underscores the near-term dilution risks from capital recycling initiatives and potential equity sales (e.g. the KKR deal), contributing to short-term earnings pressures. | The mixed sentiment continues, with strong long-term EPS growth targets maintained while near-term dilution risks are now increasingly linked to new funding initiatives, intensifying concerns over immediate earnings pressures. |
Shifts in Narrative | In Q4 2024, discussions included both detailed region-specific issues (California rate cases, CAISO adder) and broader capital execution strategies. Q3 2024 maintained a focus on regulatory details (for instance, the California GRC) alongside disciplined capital allocation but did not explicitly note a narrative shift. | Q2 2025 marks an evident shift away from hyper-specific regional regulatory cases to a broader strategic emphasis on regulatory and capital execution factors—highlighting Texas developments such as HB 5247, incremental CapEx, and more generalized regulatory frameworks, moving the narrative toward overall operational excellence. | The narrative is shifting towards a broader and more integrated focus on capital execution and regulatory frameworks rather than being anchored in specific regional issues, reflecting a strategic repositioning to support long-term growth. |
-
Equity Sale
Q: Impact of KKR LOI on stake sale?
A: Management explained that the LOI envisions an equity sale in the 15% to 30% range—with flexibility tied to valuation—to optimize transaction value and balance-sheet strength. -
Capital Plan
Q: Is incremental capital included in the base plan?
A: They clarified that the current $36B base plan excludes the extra $12B opportunity, which will be reviewed and updated later as growth opportunities evolve. -
Credit Impact
Q: How will the equity sale affect credit metrics?
A: Management noted that a successful equity sale could lower downgrade thresholds and enable deconsolidation, thereby enhancing credit quality while supporting future investments. -
UTM/ROE
Q: What’s the timeline for UTM filings and ROE gains?
A: They expect the first UTM filing in the first half of next year, with incremental improvements in ROE—about 50 to 100 basis points—as more capital is deployed. -
LNG Market
Q: What is the outlook for LNG at Port Arthur?
A: Management remains bullish, citing strong demand driven by energy security in Europe and affordability in Asia, bolstered by the world‐class JERA agreement and U.S. production advantages. -
Data Centers
Q: Are Texas load figures capped at current levels?
A: They indicated that high-confidence load numbers, updated annually, are dynamic; ongoing interconnection requests point to sustained and growing demand. -
Port Arthur FID
Q: Can Port Arthur Phase II reach FID by year-end?
A: With key permits in hand, a significant SPA with JERA, and active financing efforts, management is confident in building the momentum toward an FID decision within this year. -
Wildfire/CA Policy
Q: What’s the view on wildfire legislation and affordability?
A: In California, they expect progress on stabilizing the wildfire framework and are pursuing immediate regulatory changes—including initiatives targeting around $300M in savings—to directly benefit customers. -
ROFR Extension
Q: Does the ROFR extension expire?
A: Management confirmed that the extension is designed to be evergreen, continuing until the parties reach a definitive agreement.
Research analysts covering SEMPRA.