Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Linda M. Redmann

Chief People Officer at STRATTEC SECURITY
Executive

About Linda M. Redmann

Chief People Officer at Strattec Security Corporation, appointed effective November 11, 2024, with a background in human capital leadership at Korn Ferry, Bolder HR, and Zimmer Biomet, and strategic HR support for the SomaLogic IPO; she holds an MBA from Loyola University Chicago and a BBA from Tiffin University . During her tenure window (FY2025), Strattec delivered improved operating and shareholder outcomes: net sales +5.1% YoY to $565M, EBITDA +9.3% to $37.5M, cash flow from operations up to $71.7M, and FY2025 TSR of ~+149% (95th percentile in Russell 2000), reflecting company programs emphasizing EBITDA and cash generation . The Board emphasized alignment via refreshed compensation design, anti-hedging/anti-pledging trading policies, and a clawback policy covering executive incentive compensation .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Korn FerryHuman capital leadership (roles not specified) Not disclosed Guided cultural transformations and organizational design
Bolder HRHuman capital leadership (roles not specified) Not disclosed Led organizational change to support growth
Zimmer BiometHuman capital leadership (roles not specified) Not disclosed Drove M&A integration to support business growth
SomaLogicStrategic HR support for IPO Not disclosed Prepared people/processes for private-to-public transition

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
None disclosed in proxy for Linda M. Redmann

Fixed Compensation

  • Not disclosed. FY2025 NEOs were CEO (Slater), CFO (Pauli), and COO (Guillot); proxy compensation tables and employment agreement terms were provided for NEOs only .

Performance Compensation

Company STIP (annual cash incentive) – design and FY2025 outcomes

  • Program covered NEOs and substantially all U.S. employees; payouts based entirely on consolidated EBITDA and Cash Flow from Operations (50%/50%), with payouts from 0% to 200% of target .
  • FY2025 performance significantly exceeded targets; NEO payouts were at 200% of target .
MetricThresholdTargetMaximumFY2025 ResultPayout % of Target
EBITDA ($MM)$20.6 $22.9 $34.3 $41.6 200%
Cash Flow from Operations ($MM)$38.7 $51.7 $64.6 $71.6 200%

Long-term incentives (PSUs and RSAs) – program structure

  • RSAs: Time-based vesting in three equal annual tranches (general program practice) .
  • PSUs: 3-year performance cycle (FY2025–FY2027), vesting based on EBITDA margin achievement (threshold 50% vesting at 80% of target; max 200% at 120% of target) .
  • FY2025 EBITDA margin achieved: 6.6%; implies year-two target margin of 7.6% (prior year +100 bps) .
PSU CycleMetricYear 1 ActualYear 2 TargetVesting Scale
FY2025–FY2027 EBITDA Margin (%) 6.6% 7.6% 50% at 80% of target; 200% at 120%

Company performance context (FY2024 → FY2025)

MetricFY2024FY2025
Net Sales ($MM)$538 $565
EBITDA ($MM)$34.4 $37.5
Cash Flow from Operations ($MM)$12.2 $71.7
TSR ($ initial 100)FY2024FY2025
Cumulative TSR value$75.76 $184.91

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Trading policies prohibit executive officers from hedging, short sales, margin accounts, and pledging Strattec securities; all executive transactions require pre-clearance with the CFO or designee .
  • Clawback policy mandates recovery of erroneously awarded incentive compensation following an accounting restatement (SEC/Nasdaq compliant) .
  • Stock ownership guidelines (NEOs): CEO 5x base salary; other NEOs 2x; executives must hold all net vested shares until guideline met .
  • Shares outstanding: 4,160,284 as of August 15, 2025; principal holders disclosed; insider ownership aggregated at the company level in proxy summary .

Employment Terms

  • Appointed Chief People Officer effective November 11, 2024 .
  • Equity eligibility governed by the 2024 Equity Incentive Plan (550,000 shares reserved; RSAs/RSUs/Options/SARs permitted; minimum 1-year vesting with limited exceptions; change-of-control provisions allow full vesting upon qualifying termination within 3 months prior to or 24 months post-CoC; no option/SAR repricing without shareholder approval) .
  • Company policies include anti-hedging/anti-pledging and a clawback; no excise tax gross-ups per compensation governance practices .

Compensation Committee Analysis and Peer Group

  • Independent consultant Pay Governance supported program redesign (peer benchmarking, ownership guidelines, incentive structures) .
  • FY2025 compensation peer group (industrial/auto adjacencies), e.g., Methode Electronics, Stoneridge, NN, Inc., Allient, Mayville Engineering, Vishay Precision Group, Miller Industries, Power Solutions International, Motorcar Parts of America, etc. .
  • 2024 Say-on-Pay support: 78.55% “For”; 2024 Equity Plan adoption approved (61.10% of eligible shares) .

Risk Indicators & Governance Signals

  • Strong governance enhancements: declassified board (annual elections), proxy access by-laws, refreshed board composition, independent chair, and adoption of ERM and FX hedging policies .
  • No related-party transactions in FY2025; director committee independence and 100% attendance noted .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Company-wide prohibition on hedging/pledging and clawback enforcement reduces misalignment risk; long-term PSU focus on EBITDA margin ties executive equity to durable profitability improvements, a positive signal for retention and execution discipline .
  • Performance tailwinds: FY2025 overachievement on EBITDA and cash flow drove max STIP payouts and strong TSR; as CPO, Redmann’s mandate over culture, accountability, and talent systems is leveraged against financial metrics embedded in incentives—supportive for continued operational predictability .
  • Retention/trading pressure: Absence of disclosed individual grants for Redmann limits visibility into her vesting/sale overhang; nevertheless, plan rules (three-year PSU cycles, one-year minimum vesting, double-trigger CoC vesting) and ownership holding requirements for NEOs (policy precedence) mitigate near-term sell pressure across leadership cohorts .
  • Benchmarking and governance: Use of a relevant industrial/auto peer set and strong say-on-pay support lowers pay inflation or misalignment risk; governance upgrades (declassification, proxy access) enhance shareholder responsiveness—constructive for valuation multiples tied to governance quality .