Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Stacey Abrams

Director at SUAC
Board

About Stacey Abrams

Stacey Abrams, age 50 as of December 14, 2023, has served as a director of ShoulderUp Technology Acquisition Corp. (SUAC) since November 19, 2021; she holds a B.A. from Spelman College, an MPA from the University of Texas LBJ School, and a J.D. from Yale University . Her background spans executive leadership (CEO/CFO/Secretary at Sage Works Production, Inc.; CEO of Sage Works, LLC), public policy (Georgia House Minority Leader 2011–2017), and entrepreneurial/non-profit roles (founder and executive director of Southern Economic Advancement Project since 2019) .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Georgia General AssemblyState Representative; Minority Leader2007–2017; Minority Leader 2011–2017Legislative leadership
Sage Works, LLCChief Executive OfficerSince September 2002Executive leadership
Sage Works Production, Inc.CEO, CFO, SecretaryNot disclosed (current)Executive leadership
Southern Economic Advancement ProjectFounder & Executive DirectorSince 2019Public policy/economic advancement
Third Sector DevelopmentChief Executive OfficerAug 1998–Mar 2019Non-profit management
NOWaccount Network CorporationSVP; Secretary2010–2016; 2012–2016Fintech operations/governance

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureNotes
Southern Economic Advancement ProjectFounder & Executive DirectorSince 2019Policy non-profit leadership
Sage Works Production, Inc.CEO, CFO, SecretaryCurrentPrivate company executive
Sage Works, LLCChief Executive OfficerSince Sept 2002Private company executive
Third Sector DevelopmentChief Executive Officer1998–2019Non-profit executive
NOWaccount Network CorporationSenior Vice President; Secretary2010–2016; 2012–2016Private fintech role

Board Governance

  • Board tenure/class: Abrams is in the “third class” of SUAC’s staggered board; the term for that class expires at the third annual meeting of stockholders .
  • Committee memberships: Member, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee (with Shawn Henry and Danelle Barrett) .
  • Committee chair roles: No chair role for Abrams is disclosed; Audit Committee members are Lauren Anderson, Janice Bryant Howroyd, Shawn Henry; Compensation Committee members are Lauren Anderson, Danelle Barrett, Janice Bryant Howroyd .
  • Independence status: In 2023, SUAC identified Lauren Anderson, Danelle Barrett, Shawn Henry, and Janice Bryant Howroyd as independent; Abrams was not named in that independence list .
  • Attendance and engagement: SUAC held four board meetings in 2022; all directors attended at least 75% of meetings except two (names not disclosed) .
  • Executive sessions: Independent directors will have regularly scheduled meetings with only independent directors present .

Fixed Compensation

ComponentAmount/TermsNotes
Annual cash retainer (non-employee directors)$0“None of our directors has received any cash compensation for services rendered to us”
Committee membership feesNot disclosed (none indicated)No director cash compensation disclosed
Committee chair feesNot disclosed (none indicated)No director cash compensation disclosed
Meeting feesNot disclosed (none indicated)No director cash compensation disclosed
Expense reimbursementYesReimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses related to SPAC activities
Administrative service fee (related party)$10,000/month to SponsorOffice/secretarial services paid to Sponsor until business combination or liquidation

Performance Compensation

  • Equity grants (RSUs/PSUs/options) to directors: None disclosed; SUAC states compensation may be determined post–initial business combination, but no director equity awards are reported in the current proxy materials .
  • Performance metrics tied to director pay: None disclosed .
Performance MetricTargetActual/PayoutNotes
None disclosedSUAC has not tied director compensation to performance metrics pre–business combination

Other Directorships & Interlocks

PersonCurrent Public Company BoardsCommittee Roles (external)Interlocks/Overlaps
Stacey AbramsNot disclosed in SUAC filingsNot disclosedNo interlocks with SUAC suppliers/customers/competitors disclosed

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Education: B.A. (Spelman College), MPA (UT Austin LBJ School), J.D. (Yale) .
  • Domain expertise: Public policy leadership, executive management, non-profit governance; authorship indicating public communications capabilities .
  • Board qualifications cited by SUAC: Considerations include educational background, professional diversity, integrity, independence, and ability to represent shareholder interests (general nom/gov criteria) .

Equity Ownership

As-of DateClass A Shares Beneficially Owned% of Class A OutstandingClass B Shares Beneficially Owned% of Class B Outstanding
Oct 25, 2023
Apr 26, 2024
Nov 7, 2024
Dec 19, 2024
Jan 13, 2025n/a (Class B converted Nov 19, 2024)n/a
  • Sponsor concentration: ShoulderUp Technology Sponsor LLC beneficially owned 11,800,000 shares (95%+ of Class A post conversion in late 2024), managed by CEO Phyllis Newhouse, indicating extreme control concentration and potential alignment/conflict dynamics for directors not holding stock directly .
  • Sponsor economic interests: SUAC notes each officer/director/advisor is, directly or indirectly, a member of or has economic interests in the Sponsor, with beneficial ownership disclaimed except to extent of pecuniary interest .

Governance Assessment

  • Committee effectiveness: Abrams serves on Nominating & Corporate Governance, an appropriate placement given her policy and leadership background; however, she is not on Audit or Compensation, which may limit direct influence over financial oversight and pay policies .
  • Independence signal ambiguity: The 2023 proxy’s independence list excludes Abrams, creating uncertainty regarding her formal independence designation; subsequent filings do not clarify individual independence statuses by name .
  • Ownership alignment: Abrams is shown with no direct beneficial ownership across multiple periods, while the Sponsor holds a controlling stake; low personal “skin-in-the-game” for non-sponsor directors can be a negative alignment signal .
  • Related-party exposure: SUAC’s administrative fee to Sponsor ($10,000/month) and policies enabling post–business combination fees, combined with directors’ economic ties to the Sponsor, present heightened conflict risks typical of SPAC structures; audit committee must pre-approve related-party transactions per policy .
  • Risk disclosures: SUAC explicitly warns of potential conflicts where directors/officers may have competitive pecuniary interests and may engage with affiliated targets, mitigated by fiduciary duty constraints and corporate opportunity renunciation provisions .
  • Attendance and engagement: Board-level attendance met the 75% threshold for most directors in 2022, but SUAC does not disclose director-specific attendance for Abrams; ongoing cadence of independent director executive sessions is noted .

RED FLAGS

  • Independence ambiguity for Abrams (not listed among independent directors in 2023 proxy) .
  • Extreme Sponsor concentration post-conversion (>95% of Class A), potentially diminishing minority investor influence and director alignment not tied to direct shareholding .
  • Related-party fee structures and directors’ economic interests in the Sponsor heighten conflict-of-interest risk typical of SPACs; strong audit committee vigilance required .
  • No disclosed director-level compensation structure or performance-tied metrics pre–business combination, reducing transparency on pay-for-performance alignment .

Compensation Committee Analysis

  • Composition: Lauren Anderson, Danelle Barrett, Janice Bryant Howroyd (Abrams not a member) .
  • Consultant policy: Committee may retain independent compensation consultants and is responsible for their oversight, subject to independence evaluations under NYSE/SEC rules .
  • Interlocks: None reported for SUAC executives in the prior year .
  • Pre–business combination constraint: SUAC reiterates that, aside from the administrative fee and expense reimbursement, no compensation is paid to stockholders/officers/directors pre–business combination, so the committee’s remit on pay is limited until a de-SPAC occurs .

Related Party Transactions

  • Policy: Audit Committee must review/approve related-party transactions exceeding $120,000 or 1% of average total assets, evaluating arm’s-length terms, independence impacts, and best interests of shareholders; conflicted directors/officers are restricted from participation in decisions .
  • Administrative services: $10,000/month paid to Sponsor for office/secretarial services until business combination or liquidation; amounts recorded as G&A and due to related party in financial statements .
  • Sponsor founder shares: Sponsor bought and holds founder shares (initially Class B; later converted to Class A on Nov 19, 2024), subject to lock-up conditions .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • SUAC’s pre–business combination posture suggests no say-on-pay disclosures for directors; proposals and voting in the 2023 proxy focused on director elections, auditor ratification, founder share and trust amendments, not advisory compensation votes .

Equity Ownership & Insider Trades Notes

  • Section 16 compliance: SUAC reported no delinquent filers for year ended Dec 31, 2023 .
  • Form 3/3A retrieval issue: Attempts to retrieve Form 3/3A content encountered database inconsistency; no transaction-level details available from those IDs in this session .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Legal and policy expertise (Yale J.D.; Georgia legislative leadership) underpin governance and nominating work .
  • Executive management and entrepreneurship experience support oversight of strategic and operating capabilities at SUAC’s target evaluation phase .

Governance Implications for Investors

  • Abrams’ placement on Nominating & Corporate Governance aligns with her background; however, independence uncertainty and lack of direct equity ownership diminish alignment signals relative to Sponsor-controlled governance .
  • Elevated conflict risk necessitates close monitoring of Audit Committee enforcement of the related-party policy and of any post–business combination compensation structures .
  • Absence of director-specific compensation/attendance detail pre–business combination limits assessment of board effectiveness; scrutiny should increase at de-SPAC when compensation structures and performance metrics are established .