SI
Savara Inc (SVRA)·Q2 2019 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2019 was dominated by Molgradex aPAP outcomes: IMPALA narrowly missed the primary endpoint (A-aDO2), but delivered statistically significant improvements in SGRQ and DLCO, supporting a continued regulatory path; management is preparing for a Type C FDA response in October and anticipates filing for Breakthrough Designation .
- Financially, net loss widened to $(21.9)M and EPS to $(0.57), driven by a $7.4M non-cash goodwill impairment and higher G&A; cash/short-term investments were $111.7M with ~$24.8M debt, supporting runway into 2021 .
- AeroVanc AVAIL guidance was pushed: enrollment completion now expected 1H 2020 (from Q3 2019) and top-line results late 2020/early 2021 (from Q2 2020), reflecting persistent pediatric screening failures and exacerbations; amikacin/fosfomycin was deprioritized to conserve resources .
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) was unavailable due to data-access limits; estimate comparisons could not be assessed this quarter. Values retrieved from S&P Global were unavailable due to service limits.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Statistically significant patient-reported quality-of-life improvement: SGRQ improvement of 12.3 points vs 4.7 on placebo (Δ=7.6; p=0.01), approximately twice the clinically meaningful threshold, underscoring tangible clinical benefit .
- Gas exchange improvement evidenced by DLCO: +11.6% predicted vs +3.9% on placebo (Δ=7.9%; p=0.007); management emphasized the “totality of data” and dose-frequency dependence across endpoints and biology .
- Operational resilience and runway: cash/short-term investments of $111.7M, debt ~$24.8M, with management reiterating runway into 2021 even after cost actions and portfolio prioritization .
- Quote: “We remain optimistic that IMPALA can serve as a registrational study... we hope to get a better understanding of the agency’s sentiments... this October” — CEO Rob Neville .
What Went Wrong
- Primary endpoint miss: A-aDO2 treatment difference of 4.6 mmHg (12.1 improvement continuous vs 8.8 placebo; p=0.17) did not reach statistical significance, raising regulatory uncertainty and potential need for an additional Phase 3 .
- AVAIL timeline slippage: enrollment completion pushed to 1H 2020 from Q3 2019; top-line results late 2020/early 2021 vs prior Q2 2020, due to ~50% pediatric screening failure and exacerbations before randomization .
- Non-cash impairment and higher OpEx: $7.4M goodwill impairment following IMPALA results and increased G&A to $4.2M drove the widened net loss/EPS vs prior periods .
Financial Results
P&L comparison
Note: Savara did not report product revenues; P&L reflects operating expenses and other income items .
Balance sheet snapshot
Clinical KPIs (IMPALA ITT, 24 weeks)
Estimate comparisons
Estimates were unavailable due to S&P Global request limits; comparisons could not be assessed this quarter.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our highest corporate priority continues to be the Molgradex aPAP program... the totality of the efficacy data are encouraging... We are proceeding with regulatory interactions... preparing for an additional Phase 3 study should that be required.” — Rob Neville, CEO .
- “Seven key factors underpin our optimism... removal of surfactant linked to improved gas exchange (A-aDO2, DLCO), correlated with clinical endpoints (SGRQ, 6MWD), with dose-frequency dependence supporting true biological effect.” — Taneli Jouhikainen, COO .
- “As of June 30th 2019, we had cash, cash equivalents and short term investments of $111.7 million and approximately $25 million in debt... sufficient funds to get us into 2021.” — Dave Lowrance, CFO .
- “We remain encouraged about IMPALA... significant improvement in SGRQ... favorable safety profile... preparing to meet with FDA and EMA to determine options to seek approval and potentially conduct an additional study.” — Rob Neville, CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Breakthrough Designation timing: plan to seek breakthrough soon after receiving FDA Type C written response in October; date not fully committed .
- Europe path: will follow customary EMA sequence, likely behind FDA due to resource considerations .
- Preparedness for additional Phase 3: company is ready if required; learnings from IMPALA inform more efficient design, with better understanding of effect size and sample size .
- Cash prioritization: focus on Molgradex aPAP and AeroVanc Phase 3; revisiting forecasts with each new data point to protect key assets and extend runway .
- IMPALA open-label (Period 2) and IMPALA-X: preliminary indications of reduced WLL frequency as treatment continues; will share details after completion of open-label period .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates for EPS and revenue in Q2 2019 and Q1 2019 were unavailable due to service request limits; as a result, beat/miss analysis versus consensus could not be performed this quarter. Values retrieved from S&P Global were unavailable due to service limits.
- Given the development-stage profile and absence of reported product revenue, near-term estimate revisions are likely to focus on R&D/OpEx trajectory, timing of AeroVanc milestones, and regulatory probabilities for Molgradex rather than revenue forecasting .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The core clinical narrative is shifting to the “totality of data”: while IMPALA missed A-aDO2, significant SGRQ and DLCO improvements, dose-frequency signals, and safety profile support continued pursuit of approval via FDA dialogue; outcome of the October Type C written response is a near-term catalyst .
- Expectation reset on AeroVanc timelines: enrollment completion to 1H 2020 and top-line late 2020/early 2021 reflect pediatric screening dynamics, affecting valuation timing for this asset; monitor quarterly enrollment progress .
- Cash runway into 2021 provides flexibility to engage regulators and, if necessary, execute an additional Molgradex Phase 3 without immediate capital needs; cost discipline includes deprioritization of exploratory programs .
- Watch for regulatory signals: breakthrough designation filing and FDA response may materially influence probability of success, program design requirements, and investor sentiment; EMA path likely follows FDA .
- Clinical KPIs point to patient benefit beyond oxygenation metrics: SGRQ and DLCO improvements, 6MWD trend, and lower WLL counts in active arms may resonate with patient-focused regulators and KOLs, supporting approvability narratives .
- Non-cash goodwill impairment and higher G&A widened GAAP loss; future quarters should be evaluated for OpEx normalization versus incremental costs to support regulatory dossiers or potential confirmatory studies .
- Trading lens: the October FDA written response and any breakthrough designation news are likely stock-moving events; AeroVanc enrollment updates and CF infection management context could also drive sentiment on the secondary asset .