Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

SI

Savara Inc (SVRA)·Q2 2019 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q2 2019 was dominated by Molgradex aPAP outcomes: IMPALA narrowly missed the primary endpoint (A-aDO2), but delivered statistically significant improvements in SGRQ and DLCO, supporting a continued regulatory path; management is preparing for a Type C FDA response in October and anticipates filing for Breakthrough Designation .
  • Financially, net loss widened to $(21.9)M and EPS to $(0.57), driven by a $7.4M non-cash goodwill impairment and higher G&A; cash/short-term investments were $111.7M with ~$24.8M debt, supporting runway into 2021 .
  • AeroVanc AVAIL guidance was pushed: enrollment completion now expected 1H 2020 (from Q3 2019) and top-line results late 2020/early 2021 (from Q2 2020), reflecting persistent pediatric screening failures and exacerbations; amikacin/fosfomycin was deprioritized to conserve resources .
  • Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) was unavailable due to data-access limits; estimate comparisons could not be assessed this quarter. Values retrieved from S&P Global were unavailable due to service limits.

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Statistically significant patient-reported quality-of-life improvement: SGRQ improvement of 12.3 points vs 4.7 on placebo (Δ=7.6; p=0.01), approximately twice the clinically meaningful threshold, underscoring tangible clinical benefit .
  • Gas exchange improvement evidenced by DLCO: +11.6% predicted vs +3.9% on placebo (Δ=7.9%; p=0.007); management emphasized the “totality of data” and dose-frequency dependence across endpoints and biology .
  • Operational resilience and runway: cash/short-term investments of $111.7M, debt ~$24.8M, with management reiterating runway into 2021 even after cost actions and portfolio prioritization .
  • Quote: “We remain optimistic that IMPALA can serve as a registrational study... we hope to get a better understanding of the agency’s sentiments... this October” — CEO Rob Neville .

What Went Wrong

  • Primary endpoint miss: A-aDO2 treatment difference of 4.6 mmHg (12.1 improvement continuous vs 8.8 placebo; p=0.17) did not reach statistical significance, raising regulatory uncertainty and potential need for an additional Phase 3 .
  • AVAIL timeline slippage: enrollment completion pushed to 1H 2020 from Q3 2019; top-line results late 2020/early 2021 vs prior Q2 2020, due to ~50% pediatric screening failure and exacerbations before randomization .
  • Non-cash impairment and higher OpEx: $7.4M goodwill impairment following IMPALA results and increased G&A to $4.2M drove the widened net loss/EPS vs prior periods .

Financial Results

P&L comparison

MetricQ2 2018Q1 2019Q2 2019
Net Loss ($USD Millions)$11.6 $12.1 $21.9
EPS ($USD)$(0.37) $(0.34) $(0.57)
R&D ($USD Millions)$9.3 $10.0 $10.5
G&A ($USD Millions)$2.5 $2.8 $4.2
Goodwill Impairment ($USD Millions)$0.0 $0.0 $7.4
Total Operating Expenses ($USD Millions)$11.9 $12.9 $22.2
Loss from Operations ($USD Millions)$(11.9) $(12.9) $(22.2)
Other Income, net ($USD Millions)$0.313 $0.808 $0.215

Note: Savara did not report product revenues; P&L reflects operating expenses and other income items .

Balance sheet snapshot

MetricDec 31, 2018Mar 31, 2019Jun 30, 2019
Cash, Cash Equivalents & Short-Term Investments ($USD Millions)$110.8 $105.2 $111.7
Debt ($USD Millions)$24.5 $24.7 $24.8
Stockholders’ Equity ($USD Millions)$108.2 $101.8 $112.8
Total Assets ($USD Millions)$152.3 $148.3 $147.3
Total Liabilities ($USD Millions)$44.1 $46.5 $34.5

Clinical KPIs (IMPALA ITT, 24 weeks)

KPIQ2 2019
A-aDO2 improvement (mmHg)12.1 continuous vs 8.8 placebo; Δ=4.6 (p=0.17)
DLCO improvement (% predicted)+11.6% continuous vs +3.9% placebo; Δ=7.9% (p=0.007)
SGRQ improvement (points)12.3 continuous vs 4.7 placebo; Δ=7.6 (p=0.01)
6-minute walk distance (meters)+39.6 continuous vs +6.0 placebo
Whole lung lavage (count)9 continuous; 7 intermittent; 17 placebo during treatment period

Estimate comparisons

MetricQ1 2019 ConsensusQ1 2019 ActualBeat/MissQ2 2019 ConsensusQ2 2019 ActualBeat/Miss
EPS ($USD)N/A (unavailable)$(0.34) N/AN/A (unavailable)$(0.57) N/A
Revenue ($USD Millions)N/A (unavailable)N/A (no product revenue reported) N/AN/A (unavailable)N/A (no product revenue reported) N/A

Estimates were unavailable due to S&P Global request limits; comparisons could not be assessed this quarter.

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
AVAIL enrollment completionAeroVanc Phase 3Q3 2019 1H 2020 Lowered/pushed out
AVAIL top-line resultsAeroVanc Phase 3Q2 2020 Late 2020 or early 2021 Lowered/pushed out
IMPALA regulatory next step (aPAP)MolgradexBLA submission H1 2020 (anticipated pre-readout) Type C written FDA response expected Oct 2019; anticipate Breakthrough Designation filing; BLA timing TBD Reset to regulatory dialogue; timing uncertain
Amikacin/Fosfomycin programExploratory pipelinePhase 2 start late 2019/early 2020 Deprioritized; to be considered later Lowered/prioritized out
Cash runwayCorporateNot specifiedInto 2021 Added runway clarity

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q4 2018, Q1 2019)Current Period (Q2 2019)Trend
Regulatory path for Molgradex (aPAP)Targeting BLA submission in H1 2020 contingent on positive IMPALA Missed A-aDO2; leveraging “totality of data”; Type C written FDA response Oct; potential Breakthrough filing From confident launch prep to data-informed regulatory dialogue
Clinical efficacy signalsInterim NTM results encouraging; IMPALA-X enrollment strong Significant SGRQ and DLCO improvements; endpoints moved in sync; IMPALA-X: 32/35 enrolled, no WLLs to date Strengthened non-primary efficacy narrative
Cash runwayRaised capital in 2018; strong cash at YE18 ($110.8M) $111.7M cash; runway into 2021 Stable; reinforced
AVAIL enrollment dynamics153 enrolled; completion Q3 2019; top-line Q2 2020 168 enrolled; pediatric screening failures ~50%; completion 1H 2020; top-line late 2020/early 2021 Delayed; acknowledging execution headwinds
Portfolio prioritizationAmikacin/fosfomycin Phase 2 planning Deprioritized to focus on later-stage programs Resource reallocation

Management Commentary

  • “Our highest corporate priority continues to be the Molgradex aPAP program... the totality of the efficacy data are encouraging... We are proceeding with regulatory interactions... preparing for an additional Phase 3 study should that be required.” — Rob Neville, CEO .
  • “Seven key factors underpin our optimism... removal of surfactant linked to improved gas exchange (A-aDO2, DLCO), correlated with clinical endpoints (SGRQ, 6MWD), with dose-frequency dependence supporting true biological effect.” — Taneli Jouhikainen, COO .
  • “As of June 30th 2019, we had cash, cash equivalents and short term investments of $111.7 million and approximately $25 million in debt... sufficient funds to get us into 2021.” — Dave Lowrance, CFO .
  • “We remain encouraged about IMPALA... significant improvement in SGRQ... favorable safety profile... preparing to meet with FDA and EMA to determine options to seek approval and potentially conduct an additional study.” — Rob Neville, CEO .

Q&A Highlights

  • Breakthrough Designation timing: plan to seek breakthrough soon after receiving FDA Type C written response in October; date not fully committed .
  • Europe path: will follow customary EMA sequence, likely behind FDA due to resource considerations .
  • Preparedness for additional Phase 3: company is ready if required; learnings from IMPALA inform more efficient design, with better understanding of effect size and sample size .
  • Cash prioritization: focus on Molgradex aPAP and AeroVanc Phase 3; revisiting forecasts with each new data point to protect key assets and extend runway .
  • IMPALA open-label (Period 2) and IMPALA-X: preliminary indications of reduced WLL frequency as treatment continues; will share details after completion of open-label period .

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus estimates for EPS and revenue in Q2 2019 and Q1 2019 were unavailable due to service request limits; as a result, beat/miss analysis versus consensus could not be performed this quarter. Values retrieved from S&P Global were unavailable due to service limits.
  • Given the development-stage profile and absence of reported product revenue, near-term estimate revisions are likely to focus on R&D/OpEx trajectory, timing of AeroVanc milestones, and regulatory probabilities for Molgradex rather than revenue forecasting .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • The core clinical narrative is shifting to the “totality of data”: while IMPALA missed A-aDO2, significant SGRQ and DLCO improvements, dose-frequency signals, and safety profile support continued pursuit of approval via FDA dialogue; outcome of the October Type C written response is a near-term catalyst .
  • Expectation reset on AeroVanc timelines: enrollment completion to 1H 2020 and top-line late 2020/early 2021 reflect pediatric screening dynamics, affecting valuation timing for this asset; monitor quarterly enrollment progress .
  • Cash runway into 2021 provides flexibility to engage regulators and, if necessary, execute an additional Molgradex Phase 3 without immediate capital needs; cost discipline includes deprioritization of exploratory programs .
  • Watch for regulatory signals: breakthrough designation filing and FDA response may materially influence probability of success, program design requirements, and investor sentiment; EMA path likely follows FDA .
  • Clinical KPIs point to patient benefit beyond oxygenation metrics: SGRQ and DLCO improvements, 6MWD trend, and lower WLL counts in active arms may resonate with patient-focused regulators and KOLs, supporting approvability narratives .
  • Non-cash goodwill impairment and higher G&A widened GAAP loss; future quarters should be evaluated for OpEx normalization versus incremental costs to support regulatory dossiers or potential confirmatory studies .
  • Trading lens: the October FDA written response and any breakthrough designation news are likely stock-moving events; AeroVanc enrollment updates and CF infection management context could also drive sentiment on the secondary asset .