Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

John Reilly

Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary at Talkspace
Executive

About John Reilly

John C. Reilly serves as Chief Legal Officer, EVP Government Relations, and Corporate Secretary at Talkspace. He joined Talkspace in March 2011 and previously served as Corporate and then General Counsel; he holds a J.D. from Boston College Law School and a B.A. from the University of Virginia .

Key facts

ItemDetail
Current roleChief Legal Officer; EVP Government Relations; Corporate Secretary
Age59
Talkspace start dateMarch 2011
EducationJ.D., Boston College Law School; B.A., University of Virginia

Company performance snapshot (context during his current tenure)

MetricLatest
Q3 2025 Revenue$59.4 million; +25% year-over-year
Q3 2025 Net Income$3.3 million
Q3 2025 Adjusted EBITDA$5.0 million
FY2025 Revenue Guidance$226–$230 million

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
TalkspaceCorporate and then General Counsel; now Chief Legal OfficerSince Mar-2011Senior legal leadership through private-to-public transition; corporate governance
Hilltop Holdings (private)Partner2004–2011Managed hospitality/real estate investments; fractional GC to start-ups
Highland Development CorporationPresident1999–2003Partnered to build/operate congregate care campuses
Kapson Senior Quarters Corp. (public assisted living)SVP, Acquisitions & Development; previously VP Development; Corporate Counsel1996–1999M&A/development for senior living platform
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (law firm)Legal associateN/AEarly legal career

External Roles

  • No current external public company directorships disclosed in the latest proxy .

Fixed Compensation

Multi-year compensation (most recent years disclosed with Reilly as NEO)

Metric (USD)20212022
Salary$232,500 $291,538
Bonus (discretionary/retention)$130,000 $327,500
Stock awards (grant-date fair value)$221,513 $264,425
Option awards (grant-date fair value)$1,034,278 $67,027
All other compensation$0 $897
Total$1,618,291 $951,387

Notes:

  • For 2024, Reilly was not a named executive officer (NEO) and therefore not included in the 2024/2023 Summary Compensation Table in the 2025 proxy; NEOs were CEO, CFO (incumbent/former), and CTO . He remains an executive officer per the executive officers table .

Performance Compensation

Annual cash incentive program (company design; 2024 NEOs)

ElementTerms
Target annual bonus100% of base salary for NEOs as of Dec 31, 2024
Performance frameworkDiscretionary; Board/CEO considered Company and individual performance; 0–150% payout range
Actual 2024 payout82% of target for eligible NEOs (paid Feb 2025)
Applicability to ReillyNot disclosed for 2024; he was not an NEO in 2024

Equity award structure and vesting

PlanAward typeVesting scheduleChange-in-control (CIC) treatmentNotes
2014 Stock Incentive PlanStock options (incl. grants to Reilly in Aug 2019)Generally 48 equal monthly installments; new-hire grants typically 1-year cliff then monthly Pre-combination options originally had 25% acceleration on certain events; executives (incl. Reilly) waived this upon business combination No new awards under 2014 Plan post-business combination; outstanding awards remain per terms
2021 Incentive Award PlanRSUs and stock options16 substantially equal quarterly installments; new hires generally 1-year cliff then quarterly If awards not assumed/replaced in a CIC, full acceleration; if assumed, no automatic acceleration NEO award examples disclosed for 2024; Reilly’s 2024 grants not disclosed

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Ownership metricAs of Jul 31, 2023As of Apr 21, 2025
Total beneficial ownership (shares incl. acquirable within 60 days)297,952; “<1%” indicated as “*” 1,028,917 (= 666,596 common + 362,321 acquirable within 60 days)
Of which acquirable within 60 daysN/A362,321
Shares outstanding (reference)166,516,177 (for ownership table basis) 167,368,089 (for ownership table basis)
Ownership as % of shares outstanding“*” (less than 1%) ~0.62% (1,028,917 / 167,368,089)

Alignment policies:

  • Stock ownership guidelines apply to executive officers, based on a multiple of base salary, with a five-year compliance window from later of adoption or appointment; specific multiples not disclosed .
  • Clawback policy (NASDAQ-compliant) for restatements; Committee may also claw back for specified misconduct .
  • Anti-hedging policy prohibits hedging transactions (e.g., collars, swaps, exchange funds) by officers/directors/employees .
  • Pledging: No explicit anti-pledging policy or pledged-share disclosures noted in the proxy .

Employment Terms

TermDetails
Employment statusAt-will; participation in health/welfare plans
Non-compete / Non-solicitIn effect during employment and for 12 months post-termination
Executive Severance Plan participation2023: Reilly designated Tier 1 participant . 2025: Current Tier 1 participants listed as Cohen, Harris, Margolin (Reilly not listed) .
Severance – no CIC (Tier 1)12 months salary continuation; up to 12 months COBRA reimbursement
Severance – CIC double-trigger (Tier 1)24 months salary; 200% of target bonus; pro-rata target bonus; up to 18 months COBRA; full equity acceleration
Equity treatment (plan-level)Under 2021 Plan, full acceleration if awards are not assumed/replaced in a CIC; otherwise no automatic acceleration
Clawback / HedgingClawback and anti-hedging policies in force

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Section 16(a) reporting timeliness: two Form 4s for John Reilly were filed late for 2024 (company disclosed delinquent reports); late filings are a governance/process flag to monitor .
  • Change in Severance Plan coverage: Reilly was Tier 1 in 2023 but is not listed among current Tier 1 participants in 2025 disclosures, potentially reducing change-of-control costs but elevating perceived retention risk if coverage was removed/changed .
  • Equity vesting cadence: quarterly vesting under the 2021 Plan creates a steady cadence of potential share supply; monitor Form 4 activity around vest dates for selling pressure signals .
  • Anti-hedging in place; no explicit pledging policy disclosure—absence of pledging disclosure is neutral but worth monitoring in future proxies .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Annual bonus design (2024): payout for eligible NEOs set at 82% of target under a discretionary framework (no quantified metrics or weightings disclosed), limiting transparency into pay-for-performance calibration .
  • Long-term incentives: continued use of time-vested RSUs and options under the 2021 Plan with quarterly vesting; no performance share units (PSUs) disclosed, indicating limited explicit performance linkage in equity awards .
  • 2014 Plan legacy options (incl. Reilly grants in Aug 2019) originally had event-based acceleration, which executives waived at the business combination—mitigates acceleration windfalls and aligns with market governance practices .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • 2025 Say-on-Pay: stockholders approved the advisory vote on executive compensation at the June 18, 2025 Annual Meeting (quorum 78.71%); approval level percentage not disclosed in the 8-K .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Reilly’s beneficial ownership increased to ~1.03 million shares and rights as of April 2025 (~0.62% of outstanding), signaling meaningful skin-in-the-game; anti-hedging and clawback policies further align incentives .
  • Retention/transition: Historical Tier 1 severance coverage (2023) provided robust double-trigger protection; his absence from the 2025 Tier 1 list suggests potential changes in severance coverage—watch for updates in future filings as this can affect retention risk and deal economics in strategic scenarios .
  • Trading signals: Quarterly vesting under the 2021 Plan creates predictable potential liquidity events; pair vesting calendars with Form 4 monitoring to gauge insider selling pressure; prior late Form 4s warrant closer scrutiny of future reporting cadence .
  • Pay-for-performance: Discretionary annual bonuses (82% payout for 2024 NEOs) without disclosed metrics reduce visibility into performance linkage; absence of PSUs may limit long-horizon performance alignment relative to peers employing explicit TSR/financial hurdles .