TR
Tamboran Resources Corp (TBN)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Pre-revenue operator delivered operational progress in Q3 FY25: completed 35‑stage SS‑2H ST1 stimulation, initiated a 90‑day flow test after a 62‑day “soak,” and reinforced funding through a US$70.4M raise, lifting pro forma cash to US$96.0M .
- First gas from the ~40 MMcf/d gross Shenandoah South (SS) Pilot remains on track for mid‑2026; compression and pipeline long‑lead items were delivered to Australia, and construction is slated to start after FID in mid‑2025 .
- Guidance cadence tightened: SS‑2H ST1 IP30 now planned for June (from April in prior quarter), IP90 by August; drilling of SS‑4H/5H/6H targeted for <25 days spud‑to‑TD each in 2H 2025 to drive cost efficiencies .
- Strategic positioning advanced: LOI signed with Arafura Rare Earths for 18–26 MMcf/d potential demand, and RBC engaged to lead farm‑out of ~400k acres in the Phase 2 Development Area; APA progressing pipeline licensing and construction plans .
- EPS modestly beat S&P Global consensus; revenue remains nil as the company is pre‑revenue, with management reiterating no material revenue expected until 2026 . See Estimates Context below.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- SS‑2H ST1 stimulation completed across 35 stages over 5,483 ft with record Beetaloo proppant intensity (~2,706 lb/ft); flow test commenced post a 62‑day soak as part of an optimized flowback strategy .
- Midstream readiness improved: Sturt Plateau Pipeline pipe delivered into Darwin and compressor units arrived in Brisbane, supporting schedule integrity for mid‑2026 first gas .
- Funding strength: US$55.4M PIPE and US$15M acreage sale raised ~US$70.4M, fully funding drilling/completions of the remaining three SS wells; pro forma cash ~US$96.0M .
- Management quote: “We are fully funded to complete the drilling of three follow-up pilot wells… First Gas remains on track… by the middle part of 2026” — Joel Riddle, CEO .
What Went Wrong
- Timing slippage on IP30 disclosure: SS‑2H ST1 IP30 moved to June from prior guidance of April; SS‑3H IP30 shifted to mid‑2025 after precautionary casing reinforcement .
- Continued negative cash flow and net losses typical of pre‑revenue stage, with CFO and net income remaining negative in Q3 FY25 .
- Operational risk reminders: company reiterates early‑stage development and “no material revenue expected until 2026,” highlighting execution, permitting, and infrastructure risks inherent in the plan .
Financial Results
Notes: *Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Comparison vs Estimates (S&P Global):
Notes: Values retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs and Operational Metrics:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We are fully funded to complete the drilling of three follow‑up pilot wells… First Gas remains on track to deliver initial 40 million cubic feet a day… by the middle part of 2026.” — Joel Riddle, CEO .
- “We plan to report IP30 flow test results in June… and will be reporting an IP90… by the end of August.” — Joel Riddle .
- “Local sand solution… can drop [sand cost] from ~$US4M to about ~$US0.5M, ~US$3.5M per well savings.” — Joel Riddle .
- “RBC Capital Markets… has initiated [the Phase 2] farm‑out process.” — Joel Riddle .
- “Pipe delivered into Darwin… compressors delivered into Brisbane… [SPCF] on track to deliver first gas in mid‑2026.” — Company materials .
Q&A Highlights
- Well cost trajectory: Current AFE ~US$28M per well; long‑term target ~US$16M via multi‑well efficiencies, local sand, higher stage/day throughput, and improved ROP/directional tools .
- Supply chain/regulatory: Long leads largely secured; APA pipeline steel on schedule; Australia insulated from trade frictions; confidence in mid‑2026 timing .
- Funding rationale: Opportunistic PIPE anchored by Formentera and top shareholders; not a read‑through on productivity; positions company fully funded into well tests and pilot execution .
- Phase 2 scale: ~160k “best” acres could support ~20 Tcf, enabling ~2 Bcf/d for ~20 years; checkerboard increases basin activity and cost deflation via multi‑operator dynamics .
- Soak optimization: CoreLab modeling points to ~60‑day optimal soak in highly desiccated Mid‑Velkerri shale; SS‑2H ST1 soaked 62 days to calibrate type curve .
Estimates Context
- Q3 FY25 EPS modestly beat S&P Global consensus: actual −$0.001559 vs consensus −$0.001603 (pre‑revenue stage, low estimate count) — modest positive surprise likely to focus investor attention on June IP30 and August IP90 flow results. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Revenue consensus was $0.00; company reiterated no material revenue until 2026, consistent with pre‑revenue status . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near‑term catalysts: SS‑2H ST1 IP30 (June) and IP90 (August) will inform productivity/type curve and drive sentiment; watch for Phase 2 farm‑out updates post IP30 .
- Execution focus: Batch drilling and zipper fracs targeting <25‑day cycles per well should drive unit cost down; local sand savings (~US$3.5M/well) are material .
- Schedule integrity: Midstream long‑leads delivered; APA licensing advancing; construction slated for 2H 2025 supports mid‑2026 first gas timeline .
- Commercial optionality: LOIs (Arafura gas, Linde helium) broaden demand/monetization pathways beyond initial NT GSA; Phase 1 expansion could lift throughput to 75–90 MMcf/d .
- Funding runway: Pro forma cash of ~US$96M post PIPE/acreage sale fully funds remaining pilot wells; watch SPCF financing terms for remaining midstream capital .
- Basin dynamics: Checkerboard fosters multi‑operator competition/efficiency gains; Phase 2 positioning targets East Coast shortfall by 2029–2030 .
- Trading lens: Any material outperformance on IP30/IP90 or firmed farm‑out terms could re‑rate risk profile; delays to flow testing or midstream milestones would be viewed negatively given pre‑revenue status .
Sources: Q3 FY25 8‑K press release and exhibits ; Q3 FY25 earnings call transcript ; Prior quarters’ 8‑Ks – –. Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.