Sign in

Kim Fisk

President, Factoring at Triumph Financial
Executive

About Kim Fisk

Kim Fisk is President, Triumph Factoring at Triumph Financial (TFIN), appointed March 25, 2025 after joining Triumph in 2012; she has 13 years at Triumph and 21 years in factoring, and holds the Certified Account Executive in Factoring (CAEF) credential . Prior roles include EVP & COO and EVP, Operations & Underwriting at Triumph Factoring, where she “was instrumental in translating strategic initiatives into operational execution” and improving efficiency and client experience . Company performance context during 2024 included Payments revenue up 35% year over year to $56.7M and Q4 Payments EBITDA margin improving to 8.6%, while the factoring segment achieved invoice aging of 96.2% and launched Factoring‑as‑a‑Service; TFIN’s 5‑year cumulative TSR reached 239% through 12/31/2024 .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Triumph FactoringPresident2025–presentLeads factoring segment following leadership reorganization; succeeds Tim Valdez (now Chairman of Factoring) .
Triumph FactoringEVP & Chief Operating OfficerPre‑2025Instrumental in translating strategic initiatives into operational execution and elevating client experience .
Triumph FactoringEVP, Operations & UnderwritingPre‑2025Leadership improved operational efficiency and underwriting discipline .
Triumph FinancialCompany tenure2012–presentJoined Triumph in 2012; 13 years at Triumph, 21 years in factoring; CAEF credential .

External Roles

No public company directorships or external board roles disclosed for Fisk. Skip.

Fixed Compensation

Not disclosed. Fisk was not a 2024 named executive officer in the proxy; individual base salary, bonus targets, and equity grant details for Fisk are not provided .

Performance Compensation

Context only: TFIN’s 2024 Annual Incentive Program (AIP) metrics and outcomes for NEOs (Fisk not disclosed as participating).

Performance MeasureWeightingThresholdTargetStretchActualEarned %
Invoice Price Adjusted EPS20%$0.94$1.38$1.82$0.61—%
Banking Segment Pre‑Tax Net Income (mm)20%$105.0$130.0$155.0$114.569%
Payments Segment Q4 2024 EBITDA Margin %20%—%5%10%9%136% (qualifiers met)
Factoring Segment Invoice Aging20%96%96%97%96.2%120%
Individual & Business Unit Objectives20%50%100%150%100%100%

• AIP design includes 20% weight on each metric; Payments payout required successful LoadPay launch and delivery of a sellable data solution (both achieved) .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Stock ownership guidelines: CEO 3× base salary; other executive officers 1.5× base salary; directors 5× annual cash retainer. Measurement by the 5th anniversary of adoption or election/appointment; unearned PSUs and unvested options excluded .
  • Hedging and pledging: Hedging and short sales prohibited; pledged shares not counted toward guidelines; pledging allowed only via pre‑approved exceptions demonstrating ability to repay without pledged securities .
  • Compliance status: Each director/executive officer is within compliance or expected to achieve compliance by their measurement date; Fisk’s individual ownership not disclosed .

Employment Terms

  • Appointment: Fisk named President, Factoring on March 25, 2025 in leadership changes aligning segments for growth .
  • Agreements: TFIN maintains substantially identical employment agreements for NEOs (Fisk’s specific agreement not disclosed), featuring 1‑year terms with auto‑renewal; extended to at least the 2nd anniversary upon change‑in‑control .
  • Severance economics (NEO templates): Qualifying termination (no CIC): 1.0× base salary for most NEOs (1.5× CEO) plus healthcare continuation (12–18 months). Double‑trigger CIC: 2.0× base + trailing 3‑year average bonus (3.0× CEO) plus healthcare continuation (24–36 months); “best‑net” 280G cutback applies .
  • Restrictive covenants: Perpetual confidentiality; non‑compete, non‑solicit, and non‑interference during employment and 1 year post‑termination .
  • Clawback: Compensation Recovery Policy compliant with SEC/Nasdaq rules recoups erroneously received incentive/equity if financials are restated .

Performance & Track Record

Company financials over Fisk’s tenure context:

MetricFY 2020FY 2021FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024
Revenues (USD)$60,385,000 $54,501,000 $83,178,000 $49,439,000*$64,596,000
Net Income (USD)$64,024,000 $112,974,000 $102,311,000 $41,081,000 $16,090,000
  • Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Operational and segment highlights:

  • Payments segment revenue grew 35% YoY to $56.7M; Q4 2024 EBITDA margin reached 8.6% (vs ~break‑even prior year); total processed payment volume $27.8B; network transactions $4.2B .
  • Factoring segment improved invoice aging to 96.2%; launched instant purchase decisioning using ML/AI; introduced FaaS and fuel program; FaaS central to C.H. Robinson partnership .
  • Fisk commentary on invoice mix: average invoice values can fluctuate as Triumph expands up‑market; mix effects reduce correlation between Triumph Factoring’s average invoice size and the broader spot market; FAS volumes expected to grow with RXO onboarding .
  • 5‑year cumulative TSR: $100 invested on 12/31/2019 grew to $239.03 by 12/31/2024; outperformed Nasdaq Bank Index .

Investment Implications

  • Compensation alignment and insider pressure: Fisk’s individual comp and grant schedules are not disclosed; however, company‑level architecture emphasizes performance equity (50% PSUs with relative/absolute TSR), double‑trigger CIC terms, clawbacks, and strict hedging/pledging restrictions—supportive of alignment and reduced hedging/pledging risk .
  • Retention and execution: Internal promotion with 13‑year tenure suggests continuity; FaaS, ML‑enabled underwriting, and large‑broker integrations (e.g., C.H. Robinson) indicate strategic execution levers in Fisk’s domain .
  • Pay‑for‑performance context: Company AIP metrics explicitly include Factoring invoice aging and Payments EBITDA margin, reinforcing operational discipline; say‑on‑pay support historically high at ~95% in 2024, indicating investor acceptance of the framework .
  • Trading signals: Lack of Fisk‑specific Form 4 data or pledging disclosures limits direct insider‑selling pressure analysis; firm‑wide prohibitions on hedging/shorting and pledging controls mitigate alignment concerns .