Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Brett Robertson

Director at Alpha Teknova
Board

About Brett Robertson

Brett Robertson, age 65, has served as an independent director of Alpha Teknova, Inc. since June 2021. She brings senior executive experience in life sciences and technology, including CFO roles and extensive legal/governance background; she holds a B.A. in anthropology from UC Berkeley and a J.D. from the University of Virginia Law School. Robertson is designated independent under Nasdaq and SEC rules and serves as an Audit Committee financial expert; she is currently Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Audit Committee .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Vineti, Inc.Chief Financial Officer2020–2022Executive finance leadership for SaaS personalized therapies
AtlasMedx, Inc.Advisory Board MemberSince 2016Clinical-stage biopharma advisory; targeted therapeutics
CureSeq, Inc.Chief Executive OfficerAug 2016–Jan 2019Led molecular diagnostics strategy and operations
Invuity, Inc. (acquired by Stryker)Chief Business Officer & General Counsel2010–2016Senior legal and commercial leadership; assisted through sale to Stryker
Leavitt Covington Ventures, LLCVenture Partner2008–2010Represented investors on multiple boards; growth initiatives
StubHub, Inc.SVP & General Counsel2006–2007Senior legal leadership
Ask Jeeves, Inc.EVP & General Counsel2002–2005Senior legal leadership
Critical PathVP Strategic Development & General Counsel1999–2001Strategy and legal leadership
Broderbund SoftwareGeneral Counsel1993–1998Corporate legal leadership

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTypeNotes
AtlasMedx, Inc.Advisory Board MemberPrivate biopharmaOngoing advisory role since 2016
Multiple investor boards (via Leavitt Covington Ventures)Board RepresentativePrivate companiesRepresented investors on multiple boards; specific companies not disclosed
Public company boards (other than TKNO)None disclosed

Board Governance

  • Committee assignments and leadership:
    • Audit Committee member; committee chaired by Martha J. Demski; all members are independent and designated “Audit Committee financial experts” .
    • Compensation Committee Chair; committee members: Demski (independent), Robertson (independent), Grossman (non‑independent under Nasdaq’s controlled company exemption) .
  • Independence: Board determined Robertson is independent under SEC and Nasdaq rules .
  • Attendance and engagement: In FY2024, the board met 9 times; Audit Committee met 5 times; Compensation Committee met 10 times. Each director attended at least 75% of board and applicable committee meetings .
  • Controlled company context: Teknova is a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules due to THP’s majority ownership and utilizes certain exemptions for committee composition (notably Compensation and Nominating/Governance) .

Fixed Compensation

Compensation Element (FY2024)Amount
Annual Board Retainer (independent director)$40,000
Audit Committee Member Fee$10,000
Compensation Committee Chair Fee$15,000
Total Cash Fees Earned$65,000

Performance Compensation

Equity Award (FY2024)Shares/TermsGrant Date Fair Value
Annual RSU grant (independent director)20,000 RSUs; vest in full on first anniversary of grant$25,800
Options outstanding (as of 12/31/2024)44,251 options (strike/expiry not disclosed in director table)
Performance Metrics in Director CompensationStatus
Financial/operational performance metrics tied to director pay (e.g., revenue, EBITDA, TSR)None disclosed; director equity is time‑based RSUs and options per policy

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CompanyRolePublic/PrivatePotential Interlock/Conflict
TKNO (Alpha Teknova, Inc.)DirectorPublicIndependent; not affiliated with controlling stockholder THP
Other public company boardsNone disclosedNone
Private company/advisory rolesAtlasMedx Advisory Board; investor-representative boards (historical)PrivateNo related‑party transactions disclosed involving Robertson

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Legal/governance and executive finance expertise; senior roles across life sciences and technology (GC/CBO/CFO) .
  • Audit Committee financial expert designation; experience overseeing financial reporting and audit processes .
  • Education: B.A. (Anthropology, UC Berkeley); J.D. (University of Virginia Law School) .

Equity Ownership

Ownership Detail (as of 4/22/2025 unless noted)Amount
Beneficial ownership (shares)72,423; less than 1% of outstanding
Options outstanding (12/31/2024)44,251 shares underlying options
RSUs outstanding (12/31/2024)20,000 shares underlying RSUs
Hedging/pledging of company stockProhibited by insider trading policy
Shares pledged as collateralNone disclosed

Insider Trades and Section 16(a) Reporting

DateFiling/DisclosureDetail
Feb 27, 2025Voluntary Section 16(a) reportDisclosed 5,000 shares owned by an irrevocable trust for which Robertson is co‑trustee and a beneficiary; no transactions disclosed

Governance Assessment

  • Strengths:
    • Independent director with dual governance roles: Audit Committee financial expert and Compensation Committee Chair; supports board oversight of financial reporting and pay practices .
    • Active committee workload (Audit: 5 meetings; Compensation: 10 meetings in 2024) and ≥75% attendance suggests engagement .
    • Director pay structure mixes modest cash retainers with time‑based RSUs, aligning incentives without performance gaming; total 2024 compensation $90,800 .
    • Beneficial ownership and outstanding awards indicate “skin‑in‑the‑game,” with hedging/pledging prohibited by policy .
  • Watch items / potential red flags:
    • Controlled company governance: Compensation Committee includes a non‑independent member (Grossman) under Nasdaq exemptions; this may dilute perceived independence of pay decisions even with Robertson as Chair .
    • THP’s 70.6% beneficial ownership centralizes control; while Robertson is independent, broader board independence is limited by controlled company status .
    • No disclosed performance metrics for director compensation; while typical for boards, investors focused on pay-for-performance may require more explicit linkage for executives; company is exempt from say‑on‑pay as an EGC, reducing external feedback mechanisms .