TM
Taylor Morrison Home Corp (TMHC)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 delivered revenue of $2.096B and diluted EPS of $2.01, with adjusted diluted EPS of $2.11; home closings gross margin was 22.1% (22.4% adjusted) and SG&A leveraged to 9.0% of home closings revenue .
- Results exceeded Wall Street consensus on EPS ($2.01 vs $1.92*) and revenue ($2.096B vs $2.034B*); EBITDA also beat ($314.0M vs $279.0M*) — driven by faster cycle times and favorable mix of to‑be‑built closings offsetting a high spec mix; management guided Q4 GM to ~21.5% as spec penetration rises .
- Orders fell 13% YoY to 2,468 and cancellations rose (15.4% of gross orders; 10.1% of beginning backlog), reflecting softer buyer sentiment; monthly absorption pace moderated to 2.4 per community despite sequential improvement through the quarter .
- Full‑year guidance lowered for deliveries (12,800–13,000 from 13,000–13,500) and land investment (~$2.3B from ~$2.4B) while ASP, tax rate, SG&A and margin targets were maintained/tightened; Q4 guide: 3,100–3,300 closings, ASP ~$590K, GM ~21.5% .
- Tactical catalysts: visible consensus beat, continued buybacks ($75M in Q3; YTD $310M), liquidity of ~$1.3B, cycle‑time improvements, and off‑balance sheet lot control at 60%; watch margin trajectory as spec closings increase and incentives remain elevated .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “We once again met or exceeded our guidance on all key metrics, including home closings volume, price and gross margin,” supported by diversified portfolio and careful calibration of pricing and pace .
- Cycle times improved by ~10 days sequentially; ~30 days faster than a year ago and ~90 days faster than two years ago, supporting production flexibility and contributing to margin outperformance vs guide .
- SG&A leverage of 80 bps YoY to 9.0% driven by lower payroll and commissions; financial services capture 88% with gross margin of 52.5% (up from 45%), helping manage incentives effectively .
-
What Went Wrong
- Net sales orders declined 13% YoY to 2,468; absorption pace fell to 2.4 from 2.8 a year ago as buyer urgency waned amid macro uncertainty .
- Cancellations rose to 15.4% of gross orders and 10.1% of beginning backlog, with drivers including contingent home sales falling through and competitive incentive-driven switching .
- Q4 margin guide implies mix headwind from higher spec penetration (specs were 72% of Q3 sales but 61% of closings), pressuring GAAP gross margin to ~21.5% in Q4 .
Financial Results
YoY comparison:
Segment breakdown (Closings, Revenue, ASP):
Operational KPIs:
Guidance Changes
Note: Adjusted margin guidance excludes impairment and certain warranty charges; reconciliation cannot be provided prospectively .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Driven by our diversified portfolio and team’s careful calibration of inventory, pricing and pace… we once again met or exceeded our guidance on all key metrics.” — Sheryl Palmer, CEO .
- “In the third quarter we realized another roughly 10 days of sequential savings, leaving us about 30 days faster than a year ago and 90 days faster than two years ago.” — CFO Curt VanHyfte .
- “With spec homes accounting for 72% of third quarter sales but 61% of closings, we expect our spec closing penetration to increase in the near term… home closings gross margin… ~21.5% in the fourth quarter.” — CFO Curt VanHyfte .
- “We are focused on deploying innovative and compelling incentives and pricing offers to drive buyer confidence and improve affordability… leaning into… spec and to‑be‑built offerings.” — Sheryl Palmer .
- “At quarter end, total liquidity was approximately $1.3 billion… net homebuilding debt‑to‑capital ratio was 21.3%.” — CFO Curt VanHyfte .
Q&A Highlights
- Incentives strategy: Mix of buy‑downs, ARMs, proprietary programs (including nine‑month forward lock) tailored to buyer needs; resort buyers favor options/lot premium concessions .
- Spec vs backlog trajectory: Elevated spec inventory to bridge near‑term demand; backlog down ~40% YoY in dollars, with starts aligned to sales and community‑specific pacing into spring 2026 .
- Regional color: Florida improving (Orlando strongest paces); Texas competitive at entry level; core locations in Carolinas and Phoenix outperform; Bay Area stable with ASP >$1M .
- Land renegotiations: ~3,400 lots renegotiated in Q3 with ~8% price cuts and ~6‑month deferrals; mix of seller financing, land banking, and structural changes; some deals walked away when terms didn’t improve .
- SG&A: Leverage aided by reservation system and centralized contracts; potential Q4 broker commission uptick noted .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 vs S&P Global consensus:
- EPS (Primary/Diluted): Estimate $1.92* (5 estimates), Actual $2.01 — beat .
- Revenue: Estimate $2.034B* (4 estimates), Actual $2.096B — beat .
- EBITDA: Estimate $279.0M*, Actual $314.0M — beat .
- Consensus Target Price: $73.63* (8 estimates).
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Note: Company also reported adjusted diluted EPS of $2.11 .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Strong execution and cost control drove a clean beat on EPS and revenue; watch Q4 gross margin mix headwind as spec closings rise — near‑term margin compression likely before stabilizing in 2026 .
- Orders and backlog continue to normalize; cancellations increased but remain below industry averages, supported by ~$45K average deposits and robust pre‑qualification .
- Asset‑lighter land strategy advancing (60% off‑balance sheet control), with tangible renegotiation wins; FY land spend trimmed to ~$2.3B, improving capital efficiency and optionality .
- Liquidity and buybacks provide downside support (YTD $310M repurchases; $600M authorization remaining); diluted shares ~101M FY and ~99M in Q4 .
- Regional performance bifurcation persists: West and Florida (core submarkets) show resilience; entry‑level remains most incentive‑sensitive (Texas competitive), supporting a spec‑weighted near‑term mix .
- Technology investments (AI‑assistant) and sales process innovations should support lead conversion and SG&A efficiency — a structural margin lever beyond rate cycles .
- Setup: Tactical buy on weakness if shares pull back on Q4 margin guide; medium‑term thesis intact on cycle‑time gains, capital discipline, and diversified consumer mix .
Financial Appendices
Backlog, cancellations, and communities:
Balance sheet and capital:
Non‑GAAP reconciliations (Q3 2025):
S&P Global estimates note: Values marked with asterisk (*) are retrieved from S&P Global.