LI
LendingTree, Inc. (TREE)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue rose 43% year over year to $239.7M but fell 8% sequentially; adjusted EPS was $0.99 while GAAP diluted EPS was $(0.92) due to a $15M litigation reserve linked to a preliminary Mantha settlement .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, the quarter was mixed: revenue missed ($239.7M vs $244.9M*) while EPS beat ($0.99 vs $0.65*) and EBITDA tracked slightly below S&P’s EBITDA consensus ($24.6M company AEBITDA vs $26.3M* S&P consensus; note S&P’s “EBITDA” may not equal company AEBITDA) .
- FY 2025 guidance was lowered (revenue to $955–$995M from $985–$1,025M) with VMM narrowed to $319–$332M and AEBITDA narrowed to $116–$124M; Q2 2025 guidance: revenue $241–$248M, VMM $80–$84M, AEBITDA $29–$31M .
- Key stock narrative catalysts: Insurance normalization after FCC “one-to-one consent” reversal, strong small business momentum, and clarity on Mantha/QuoteWizard settlement payment schedule; cash of $126M supports July convertible maturity plans .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Broad-based growth: all three segments grew YoY; Insurance +71% YoY revenue, Home +22%, Consumer +9% .
- Small business and personal loans strength: small business +48% YoY; personal loans +16% YoY; management expects record SMB revenue in 2025 .
- Management discipline and execution: “quarterly AEBITDA grew 14% YoY” and the team is “establishing a culture of efficiency” with careful fixed-cost control and targeted growth investment .
- Home equity resilience: Home Equity revenue +24% YoY; favorable structural backdrop from high tappable home equity .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP loss driven by litigation reserve: $(12.4)M GAAP net loss and $(0.92) diluted EPS due to $15M reserve increase for Mantha TCPA settlement in principle .
- Insurance sequential step-down: Insurance revenue declined 15% Q/Q due to a Q4 budget spike from a carrier and Q1 consumer experience changes for FCC rule; margin compressed (segment profit margin 26% vs 28% in Q4) .
- Efficiency metrics compressed: VMM % fell to 32% (from 41% YoY and 33% in Q4); adjusted EBITDA margin slipped to 10% (from 13% YoY and 12% in Q4) as Insurance mix and one-time expenses weighed .
Financial Results
Segment breakdown
KPIs and balance sheet
Estimate comparison (S&P Global)
Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.
Guidance Changes
Note: No explicit guidance provided for tax rate, OpEx line items, or OI&E in the materials reviewed.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We are happy to report quarterly AEBITDA grew 14% YoY… YoY revenue growth in all three segments exemplifies the durability of the ongoing improvement in our financial performance.” — Doug Lebda, Chairman & CEO .
- “Our commitment to operational excellence is steadily delivering numerous wins across the company… helped to broaden growth across all three of our segments.” — Scott Peyree, President & COO .
- “We remain focused on carefully managing our fixed costs while strategically investing in discrete growth initiatives… establishing a culture of efficiency as we move forward.” — Jason Bengel, CFO .
- “We expected a sharp recovery once we reverted back to our previous customer experience [post FCC ruling], but it has taken longer than anticipated.” — Doug Lebda .
- “Low to mid-30s is where we want to be on the [Insurance] VMM side… we’ll be there sooner rather than later.” — Scott Peyree .
Q&A Highlights
- Tariffs impact: Carriers are in a stronger profitability position than past 3–5 years; expect cautious behavior but minimal impact to marketing strategies; guidance does not bake macro changes; business model resilient to volatility .
- Small business trajectory: Concierge model scaling, unit economics attractive; optimism to maintain strong levels and deliver record revenue in 2025; very profitable vertical .
- Mortgage sensitivity: A “5 handle” on 30-year mortgage rates would catalyze a “seismic shift” in demand; Home equity remains the substitution product in current environment .
- Insurance VMM normalization: Target long-term VMM in low-to-mid 30s; Q1 step-back from one-time issues; expect continued margin improvement .
- Cost levers and ZBB: Detailed understanding of cost base from zero-based budgeting enables rapid expense response if macro deteriorates; variable comp and marketing spend provide natural buffers .
- Litigation: Mantha (QuoteWizard) settlement in principle; $19M liability payable in three installments after July convert maturity .
- Student loans: Product effectively exited due to low demand; not material revenue impact .
Estimates Context
- EPS beat: Adjusted EPS $0.99 vs S&P Primary EPS consensus $0.65*; likely upward estimate revisions for EPS if Insurance and SMB momentum persists .
- Revenue miss: $239.7M vs consensus $244.9M*; Insurance sequential step-down and FCC-driven disruption explain shortfall; Q2 guidance indicates stabilization .
- EBITDA vs AEBITDA: Company reports Adjusted EBITDA ($24.6M) while S&P tracks EBITDA consensus ($26.3M*); investors should reconcile framework differences when comparing .
Values marked with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Mix-led beat/miss: Strong EPS beat despite revenue miss underscores operating discipline and SMB/Home Equity monetization; monitor Insurance normalization path in Q2/Q3 .
- Guidance reset: FY revenue range lowered; near-term guide implies sequential stabilization; watch Insurance budgets and VMM % trend back toward low-to-mid 30s target .
- SMB is a margin lever: Concierge-driven SMB growth is accelerating and accretive; expect ongoing support for consolidated margin dollars .
- Litigation overhang de-risking: Settlement schedule clarifies cash timing post-July convert; cash $126M and Apollo facility draw position the company to meet obligations .
- Housing optionality: Home Equity strength continues; a move to a “5 handle” mortgage rate could unlock purchase/refi upside longer-term .
- Execution watchpoints: Track Insurance margin optimization, marketing mix, and expense control under ZBB; monitor consumer demand stability and lender underwriting .
- Near-term trading: Narrative sensitivity to Q2 Insurance budgets and margin trajectory, plus any court approvals on Mantha; beats on VMM/AEBITDA vs guide could be positive catalysts .