TI
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL (TRT)·Q3 2018 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 FY2018 revenue was $10.10M (+2.8% YoY), but diluted EPS was a loss of ($0.20) due primarily to a one-time, non-cash $0.9M U.S. tax reform charge; gross margin compressed to 22% on mix shift and seasonality .
- Segment breadth remained resilient: testing services revenue +23.6% YoY and distribution +28.5% YoY, offsetting a 26% decline in manufacturing due to reduced orders from a large customer .
- Management highlighted Chinese New Year seasonality and expects improving business operations in Q4; nine-month operating income +30% YoY and would have produced strong net income excluding the one-time tax charge .
- No formal guidance or earnings call transcript was available; Wall Street consensus from S&P Global was unavailable at time of request (likely due to coverage/limits), so estimate comparison cannot be provided (S&P Global data unavailable) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Testing and distribution strength: testing services revenue +23.6% YoY to $4.913M and distribution +28.5% YoY to $2.033M in Q3, demonstrating robust demand across services and distribution channels .
- Management confidence and Q4 outlook: “We are encouraged that demand for Trio-Tech's testing and distribution services remained as robust… we expect improving business operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018” .
- Nine-month operational momentum: income from operations +30% YoY to $1.479M (5% of revenue) despite the tax charge, underscoring improved core execution .
What Went Wrong
- Manufacturing decline and customer concentration: manufacturing revenue fell 26% YoY in Q3 due to reduced orders from a large customer, highlighting concentration risk .
- Margin compression: Q3 gross margin dropped to 22% from 25% a year ago on product mix changes in manufacturing and testing services, weighing on profitability .
- One-time tax headwind: net loss of ($0.739M) and diluted EPS of ($0.20) in Q3, largely driven by a non-cash $0.9M tax expense tied to U.S. tax reform .
Financial Results
Quarterly Trend (Q1 → Q2 → Q3 FY2018)
Year-over-Year (Q3 FY2017 vs Q3 FY2018)
Segment Revenue Breakdown (Q3 FY2017 vs Q3 FY2018)
Operating Expenses (Q3 FY2017 vs Q3 FY2018)
Nine-Month Context (FY2018 YTD vs FY2017 YTD)
Guidance Changes
Note: The company did not issue quantitative guidance ranges; management indicated expectations for improving business operations in Q4 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
No earnings call transcript was found for Q3 FY2018; themes are derived from management’s press releases.
Management Commentary
- “We are encouraged that demand for Trio-Tech's testing and distribution services remained as robust in the third quarter as it was in the year's first half… we expect improving business operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018.” – S.W. Yong, CEO .
- “As always, we are focused on improving operating efficiencies and reducing costs wherever possible… This time-tested strategy is viewed as the foundation for Trio-Tech's continued success.” – S.W. Yong .
- “The automotive industry is a particularly attractive opportunity for us. We are pleased by the progress we have made so far this fiscal year.” – S.W. Yong (Q2) .
- “Our Singapore and Tianjin, China operations were especially strong… This was our strongest quarterly financial performance in quite some time.” – S.W. Yong (Q1) .
Q&A Highlights
- No Q3 FY2018 earnings call transcript was available; therefore, no Q&A themes or clarifications can be reported [Search returned none].
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus EPS/Revenue estimates via S&P Global were unavailable at time of request due to access limits and likely limited analyst coverage for TRT; as such, we cannot provide a formal comparison to consensus for Q3 FY2018 (S&P Global data unavailable) .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Core demand remains healthy in testing and distribution, supporting multi-segment resilience despite manufacturing softness tied to a large customer .
- Margin volatility is driven by product mix and seasonality; watch Q4 to validate management’s expectation of operational improvement post-Chinese New Year .
- The Q3 net loss was primarily a non-recurring tax reform charge; normalization excludes the $0.9M non-cash expense, suggesting underlying earnings power remains intact .
- Customer concentration risk in manufacturing warrants attention; diversification of orders could stabilize that segment’s contribution .
- YTD operating income growth (+30% YoY) signals strengthened operational execution, even with margin headwinds and the tax charge .
- FX tailwinds boosted equity via translation gains in 9M FY2018, which supports book value but is non-operational in nature .
- Near-term trading: potential relief rally on removal of the one-time tax headwind and seasonal recovery; medium-term thesis should focus on sustaining testing/services growth, mix management to stabilize margins, and mitigating customer concentration in manufacturing .