TSLX Q1 2025: Debt cost drops 130 bps, lowering funding expenses
- Disciplined Capital Allocation in Volatile Environments: Management emphasized its ability to deploy capital selectively during volatile periods, noting that market stress has historically generated excess returns (up to 200 basis points of excess return) relative to nonvolatile periods.
- Consistent Credit Quality: The Q&A highlighted low nonaccrual levels and stable internal risk ratings, suggesting resilient credit quality even amid market uncertainties.
- Efficient, Flexible Capital Structure: The firm’s strategic use of its ATM equity program and proactive balance sheet management supports low-cost capital fundraising while providing the flexibility to capture attractive risk-return opportunities.
- Delayed and muted M&A activity: Executives noted that attractive M&A opportunities are unlikely to materialize in the near term, which could limit the firm’s ability to deploy capital effectively in a volatile environment.
- Potential headwinds from deglobalization and rising discount rates: Comments in the Q&A section highlighted concerns that a shift toward deglobalization may lead to inflationary pressures and slower growth, ultimately increasing discount rates and reducing asset valuations.
- Increased reliance on the ATM program and potential dilution risk: While the ATM program provides flexibility, there is a risk that more frequent or aggressive use could lead to dilution of shareholder value if market conditions remain challenging.
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Total Revenue | Decreased 1.3% (from $117.8 million to $116.3 million) | Total Revenue decreased slightly due to modest reductions in revenue components compared to the previous period, reflecting minor shifts in interest and fee income components relative to Q1 2024. |
Net Investment Income | Increased 10.8% (from $52.36 million to approx. $57.98 million) | Net Investment Income improved due to a larger average investment size and enhanced interest income performance, which built on gains from Q1 2024. |
Interest Expense | Declined by roughly 15% (from $39.03 million to $32.97 million) | Interest Expense fell significantly because of lower swap settlement costs and a decrease in the weighted average interest rate (from 7.6% to 6.4%), reducing financing costs compared with Q1 2024. |
Earnings per Share (EPS) | Dropped about 26% (from $0.53 to $0.39 per share) | EPS deteriorated notably largely due to lower net income levels—stemming from diminished realized gains and other negative impacts—relative to Q1 2024's stronger performance. |
Net Increase in Operating Assets from Operations | Fell approximately 22% (from $47.52 million to $36.96 million) | The net increase in operating assets declined as lower net investment income retention and reduced operating cash flows outweighed asset growth, compared with Q1 2024. |
Total Assets | Grew modestly by about 1.3% (from $3,452.0 million to $3,498.5 million) | Total Assets saw a slight increase, primarily driven by modest rises in investment values, cash balances, and receivables, continuing a positive trend versus Q1 2024. |
Debt | Increased slightly (from $1,804.3 million to $1,844.8 million; 2.2% rise) | The debt level increased modestly as additional borrowing was likely used to support ongoing operations and investments, maintaining a stable leverage profile relative to the previous period. |
Total Net Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) | Worsened significantly (from –$6.97 million to –$21.86 million) | The net change in unrealized gains (losses) turned markedly more negative due to a dramatic adverse swing in valuation adjustments driven by unfavorable market conditions impacting portfolio investments compared to the previous period. |
-
ATM Frequency
Q: Raise capital more often?
A: Management stated there’s no change in ATM frequency; they use it only when it’s accretive, preserving a disciplined capital structure. -
ATM Execution
Q: Dribble or lump-sum issuance?
A: They explained the ATM provides timely, flexible access to capital while maintaining their conservative approach to raising funds. -
ATM Speed
Q: Can ATM scale with deal flow?
A: Management noted that although execution adjusts with deal flow, ATM remains just one of several tools, not a substitute for their historical capital roll strategy. -
Cost of Debt
Q: Why did debt cost drop?
A: They attributed the over 130 bps decline to a favorable funding mix and lower spreads, which has reduced the overall weighted average cost of debt. -
Risk Transfers
Q: Do structured risk transfers lower costs?
A: Management sees them as beneficial for expanding lending capacity, though they don’t directly lower pricing. -
Capital Efficiency
Q: Shrink capital to boost ROE?
A: They believe it’s too early to return capital, as current levels support volatility and provide strategic deployment options. -
Global Trade
Q: Does deglobalization affect allocation?
A: The team noted that slower global trade is increasing discount rates and may moderate growth, influencing long-term valuation assumptions. -
Risk Pricing
Q: Are deal flows affected?
A: Management confirmed that top-of-funnel dynamics remain robust, ensuring sufficient opportunities even amid volatility. -
Lane 2/3 Outlook
Q: How are non-sponsored deals evolving?
A: They’re beginning to see such opportunities, but full materialization may require more pronounced market stress. -
Credit Opportunities
Q: Is volatility spurring better opportunities?
A: They expect to capture spread volatility by shifting into more liquid markets, despite some delays in private credit developments. -
Credit Ratings
Q: Any significant rating changes?
A: There have been no material migrations; overall internal risk ratings remain stable and strong. -
Liability Safety
Q: Will banks' risk off affect liabilities?
A: Management anticipates no impact on liabilities, thanks to proactive balance sheet management and cautious refinancing. -
M&A Outlook
Q: How soon will M&A resume?
A: They foresee a prolonged turnaround with noninvestment-grade M&A likely shifting more into 2026, reflecting a cautious market view. -
Retail Flows
Q: What about retail capital movement?
A: The response was that retail flows remain uncertain and challenged by liquidity issues inherent in nontraded vehicles. -
Dividend Income
Q: Why is dividend income lower?
A: Lower current dividend income is largely due to one-off payments last quarter, resulting in a transient decline. -
Deployment Balance
Q: Will deployment slow versus repayments?
A: They expect a modest contraction—around $30–40 million—as repayments edge out new deployments in a natural balance sheet adjustment. -
Sponsor Dynamics
Q: Will sponsor-backed deals resume?
A: Despite some technical shifts, management will pursue deals offering the best risk–return, irrespective of sponsorship. -
IRG Performance
Q: How’s IRG Sports performing?
A: It is being managed for exit, with performance adjustments underway as part of a broader asset disposition process.
Research analysts covering Sixth Street Specialty Lending.