SS
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 delivered solid earnings power: Investment income rose to $123.7MM, adjusted NII was $0.61/sh (GAAP NII $0.62/sh), and adjusted NI was $0.54/sh (GAAP NI $0.55/sh); annualized ROE was 14.2% (adj. NII) and 12.5% (adj. NI). NAV/share increased to $17.16 from $17.12 QoQ, with adjusted NAV $17.09 after the supplemental dividend .
- Activity-based fees were a key upside driver: $0.15/sh in Q4 (highest in seven quarters) amid a resurgence of repayments; fundings of $323.5MM and repayments of $304.7MM supported fee income and portfolio rotation .
- The Board declared a Q1’25 base dividend of $0.46/sh and a Q4’24 supplemental dividend of $0.07/sh; adjusted NII covered the base by $0.15/sh (33%), reinforcing dividend sustainability .
- Outlook: 2025 adjusted NII guidance of $1.97–$2.14/sh (ROE 11.5%–12.5%) assumes current spread conditions and a conservative activity fee range; management expects to amend/extend the revolver with marginally lower drawn spread/undrawn fee in Q1’25 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Strong earnings quality and coverage: “Adjusted NII of $0.61/sh exceeded our base quarterly dividend by $0.15/sh, or 33%,” while NAV/share edged up to $17.16 .
- Fee tailwinds resurfaced: “In Q4, we earned $0.15 per share of activity-based fees, including dividend income, representing the highest amount in 7 quarters,” aided by elevated repayments .
- Balance sheet/liquidity positioning: $674MM undrawn revolver capacity against $205MM eligible unfunded commitments; management anticipates marginally lowering revolver spreads/fees upon amendment in Q1’25 .
-
What Went Wrong
- Credit headwinds persisted in a few names: Two idiosyncratic credits (incl. Lithium Technologies) weighed on 2024, with non-accruals at 1.4% of FV in Q4 (no new additions in the quarter) .
- Spread compression: Tighter front-book spreads versus early-2024 reduced NII by ~$0.07/sh vs. forecast; management’s sector ROE math highlights risk to industry returns absent repricing .
- Portfolio yield stepped down: Weighted avg yield at amortized cost declined to 12.5% (from 13.4% in Q3), driven by lower base rates and mix/spread adjustments on certain assets .
Financial Results
Quarterly P&L and Returns (oldest → newest)
YoY Comparison: Q4 2024 vs Q4 2023
Originations, Repayments, and Credit
Portfolio Composition (% of FV)
Liquidity and Leverage
Notes:
- Q4 GAAP-to-Adjusted: ~$0.01/sh benefit from unwind of accrued capital gains incentive fee expenses; full-year unwind totaled ~$0.06/sh .
- Activity-based fees: $0.15/sh in Q4 vs ~$0.05/sh in Q3; Q4 level was the highest in seven quarters .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO on fee tailwinds and dividend coverage: “In Q4, we earned $0.15 per share of activity-based fees... highest amount in 7 quarters… adjusted NII of $0.61/sh exceeded our base quarterly dividend by $0.15/sh or 33%.”
- CEO on sector spreads/ROE: “A weighted average portfolio spread at 529 bps generates approximately 5% ROE for the sector… we continue over-earning our cost of capital even in a more competitive… spread environment.”
- CFO on cost of debt: “Our weighted average interest rate on average debt outstanding decreased ~70 bps from 7.7% to 7%… our liability structure is entirely floating rate.”
- President on pipeline and differentiation: “Q4 was our busiest quarter in 3 years… TRP Energy recap… we expect ~$0.07/sh of estimated activity-based fees in Q1’25 from Arrowhead prepayment terms.”
Q&A Highlights
- Origination mix and capital solutions: TRP was a first-lien financing; capital solutions expected to be more prevalent in 2025 with spreads roughly SOFR+600–850 for such deals in pipeline .
- Credit/watchlist updates: Working on asset sales at IRG; Lithium’s headwinds were fundamental and already captured in non-accruals; overall credit amendments low and mostly positive .
- Spreads outlook: Market self-correction expected via supply/demand and investor ROE signaling; guidance embeds conservative turnover/fees .
- Nonsponsored channel: Major contributor to portfolio differentiation and higher asset-level returns; 2024 nonsponsored fundings were notable, with Arrowhead/Belk examples .
- Capital strategy: Leverage at top end of target (~1.2x); not inclined to issue equity unless ROEs are sustainably accretive at prevailing spreads .
Estimates Context
- We attempted to retrieve S&P Global consensus (EPS/Revenue) for Q4 2024 but were unable to due to a daily request limit exceeded by the data provider; therefore, we cannot quantify beat/miss versus Street for this quarter. We will update as soon as access is restored to S&P Global consensus.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Earnings quality remains robust: Adjusted NII covered the base dividend by 33%, with NAV/share up QoQ, underscoring durable earnings power and capital return capacity .
- Fee acceleration provided incremental upside: $0.15/sh activity-based fees (7-quarter high) driven by elevated repayments; early Q1’25 fee tailwind expected from Arrowhead .
- Credit stable-to-improving: Non-accruals fell to 1.4% FV with no new additions; portfolio rating improved; management constructive on credit trajectory .
- Cost of debt tailwind: Entirely floating liabilities and lower base rates reduced WACD to 7.0%, supporting NII resilience even as asset yields step down .
- Spread discipline differentiates TSLX: Management highlights sector ROE pressure at current spreads but positions TSLX’s sourcing/pricing to sustain above-cost-of-capital returns .
- 2025 guide is conservative: Adjusted NII $1.97–$2.14/sh (ROE 11.5%–12.5%) assumes muted fees and current spreads; potential upside if M&A velocity and pricing improve .
- Near-term catalysts: Supplemental dividends, revolver amend/extend with lower fees/spread, potential incremental fee income from repayments, and continued NAV stability .
Appendix: Additional Relevant Press Releases (Q4 2024)
- Affirm partnership: Sixth Street’s Asset Based Finance platform agreed to invest up to $4B via a forward flow structure purchasing Affirm loans, highlighting platform breadth and potential deal flow adjacency (platform-level, not necessarily TSLX balance sheet) .