Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
- Robust Demand Across Aviation Product Lines with Sustained Order Activity: Textron's Aviation segment is experiencing strong demand across all models, particularly for the new Gen 3 aircraft. The CJ3 and CJ4 product lines saw exceptionally strong orders following the Gen 3 announcements, indicating healthy customer interest that is expected to continue throughout 2025. Scott Donnelly stated, "It's been pretty much across the product line... The demand and order activity across every model has been good... we'll continue to see sustained demand through the course of the year."
- Improved Supply Chain and Workforce Stability Leading to Higher Deliveries and Margins: Supply chain issues and workforce disruptions from 2024 are being resolved, positioning Textron to ramp up production. The company expects to increase deliveries to approximately 190 aircraft in 2025, up from 151 in 2024. Scott Donnelly mentioned, "Third-party parts supply chain... are certainly in a much better position than they were throughout the course of 2024... we're going to be able to make that ramp and deliver on the guide at $6.1 billion [in Aviation revenues]." Additionally, margins are expected to improve significantly as factory efficiencies increase. Donnelly stated, "We certainly expect performance and factory efficiencies to be up significantly versus 2024... Most of our margin improvement... in 2025 (is) as a result of much better factory performance."
- Strong Backlog and Predictable Defense Revenues Supporting Future Growth: The backlog in both the Aviation and Bell segments provides visibility into future revenues. The Future Long Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA) program and other defense contracts are well-supported by appropriations and customer guidance, with minimal risk to the downside. Scott Donnelly commented, "This is all mostly backlog business... I don't think there's risk around that... I don't think there's a lot of risk to the downside of where we are on the Bell numbers." This strong backlog positions Textron well for sustained growth in its defense segments.
- Textron Aviation's margins dropped to 7.8% in Q4 2024, attributed to production disruptions from a strike. While management expects margins to improve in 2025, there is uncertainty about the pace of recovery and the ability to achieve margin targets. , ,
- Bell's margins were lower than expected in Q4 2024, impacted by program adjustments, including margin dilution from fixed-price options on the FLRAA program. This may indicate ongoing margin pressure and challenges in meeting margin guidance. ,
- The company's cash flow guidance for 2025 is expected to be back-end loaded due to inventory buildup from undelivered aircraft in 2024. This raises concerns about cash flow timing and potential impacts on financial performance if deliveries are further delayed. ,
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Total Revenue | -7% | Primarily driven by lower volume in Textron Aviation (due to a labor strike) and in the Industrial segment, which outweighed the revenue gains at Bell. Softness in Specialized Vehicles end markets and supply chain challenges also contributed. |
Textron Aviation | -16% | The labor strike by IAM workers caused delayed aircraft deliveries, resulting in lower volume and mix, despite selective pricing actions. Ongoing supply chain constraints further limited production capacity. |
Bell | +5% | Achieved higher revenues from increased military volume, notably related to the FLRAA program, and improved commercial deliveries. This growth helped mitigate declines in other segments. |
Industrial | -10% | Reduced demand in the Specialized Vehicles product line, driven by soft end markets, led to lower volume. Although cost reduction efforts were made, they did not fully offset the revenue impact. |
Textron eAviation | +1000% | Growth from a small base as the segment accelerates research and development activities and pursues new product introductions. This surge reflects ongoing eAviation investments, though it remains immaterial compared to the larger segments. |
United States Revenue | -9% | Lower volumes in Textron Aviation (due to the strike) and in Industrial overshadowed the revenue gains at Bell. Military sales provided a partial offset, but overall U.S. demand was still down from the prior year. |
Net Income | -29% | Impacted by reduced segment profits at Textron Aviation and Industrial, as well as higher costs stemming from labor disruptions. The net result reflects lower operational performance and partially offset improvements at Bell. |
EPS (Diluted) | -24% | Follows the drop in net income, with added pressure from higher interest expense and insufficient share repurchases to fully offset the earnings decline. The labor strike and softer end markets weighed on profitability, reducing earnings per share. |
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted EPS | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $6.00 to $6.20 | no prior guidance |
Manufacturing Cash Flow (before pension contributions) | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $800 million to $900 million | no prior guidance |
Textron Aviation Revenue | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $6.1 billion | no prior guidance |
Textron Aviation Margin | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | 12% to 13% | no prior guidance |
Bell Revenue | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $4 billion | no prior guidance |
Bell Margin | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | 8.5% to 9.5% | no prior guidance |
Textron Systems Revenue | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $1.3 billion | no prior guidance |
Textron Systems Margin | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | 12% to 13% | no prior guidance |
Industrial Revenue | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $3.2 billion | no prior guidance |
Industrial Margin | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | 4.5% to 5.5% | no prior guidance |
eAviation Revenue | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $45 million | no prior guidance |
eAviation Segment Loss | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $70 million | no prior guidance |
Finance Segment Profit | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $25 million | no prior guidance |
Corporate Expense | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $160 million | no prior guidance |
Net Interest Expense (Manufacturing Group) | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $130 million | no prior guidance |
LIFO Inventory Provision | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $165 million | no prior guidance |
Intangible Asset Amortization | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $35 million | no prior guidance |
Non-Service Pension Income | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $265 million | no prior guidance |
Effective Tax Rate | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Approximately 18% | no prior guidance |
Research & Development (R&D) | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $500 million | no prior guidance |
Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $425 million | no prior guidance |
Average Share Count | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | 184 million shares | no prior guidance |
| Metric | Period | Guidance | Actual | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Textron Aviation Revenue | FY 2024 | ~$5.5B | $5,284M = 1,188+ 1,475+ 1,339+ 1,282 | Missed |
Industrial Revenue | FY 2024 | ~$3.5B | $3,515M = 892+ 914+ 840+ 869 | Beat |
EAviation Revenue | FY 2024 | ~$35M | $33M = 7+ 9+ 6+ 11 | Missed |
Finance Revenue | FY 2024 | ~$50M | $50M = 15+ 12+ 12+ 11 | Met |
Interest Expense | FY 2024 | ~$85M | $50M = 20+ 25+ 26+ (-21) | Beat |
Adjusted EPS | FY 2024 | $5.40 – $5.60 | $4.32 = 1.03+ 1.35+ 1.18+ 0.76 | Missed |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Strong demand and backlog in Textron Aviation | Q3: Backlog at $7.6B with $1B+ new orders. Q2: $7.5B backlog, strong demand. Q1: $7.3B backlog, above 1:1 book-to-bill. | Backlog at $7.8B (up $676M), with continued robust demand and a 1:1 book-to-bill ratio. | Continuing coverage |
Supply chain constraints and improvements | Q3: Fewer part shortages, strike planning with suppliers. Q2: Some ongoing constraints but improving. Q1: Progress amid lingering issues (e.g., windshields). | Supply chain in a better position, with improved parts flow and workforce stability expected to support production ramp-up in 2025. | Continuing coverage |
Strike-related disruptions in the Aviation segment | Q3: 4-week strike lowered revenue $50M, segment profit $30M; no mention in Q2 or Q1. | Significant disruption with $242M revenue impact vs. prior year. One-third of Q4 production time lost. New 5-year contract in place. | Continuing coverage (introduced in Q3) |
Bell's FLRAA program and defense revenue visibility | Q3: Entered EMD phase after Milestone B. Q2: FLRAA ramp boosted military volume. Q1: Nearing Milestone B, revenue ramp expected 2025. | FLRAA ramp is margin-dilutive but key to Bell’s 2025 revenue growth. US Army option for two test aircraft. | Continuing coverage |
Margin fluctuations in Aviation and Bell | Q3: Mid-11% margins at Aviation, FLRAA mix at Bell. Q2: Aviation mid-teens potential, Bell rising. Q1: Aviation incremental margin 46%, Bell up 130bps. | Aviation hit 7.8% margin in Q4 due to strike-related inefficiencies. Bell margins face 2025 pressure from FLRAA mix. | Continuing coverage |
Industrial segment softness and reduced production volumes | Q3: Soft demand, cut production volumes. Q2: Lower consumer/auto demand, implemented cost reductions. Q1: Specialized vehicles demand fell $40M. | Ongoing softness in specialized vehicles; $92M revenue drop. Strategic review of powersports. | Continuing coverage |
Compression of price inflation benefits and margin pressure | Q3: Spread compressing, net price vs. inflation zero. Q2: Smaller spread offset by factory gains. Q1: Prices outpacing inflation, but gap shrinking. | No direct mention of price-inflation compression in Q4. | No mention |
eAviation developments (Velis Electro, Nexus eVTOL) | Q3: Nexus and Nuuva 300 updates (no Velis detail). Q2: General references to automation. Q1: Velis Electro gained FAA exemption; Nexus flight tests planned. | No specific mention of these models. Textron eAviation saw $11M revenue and $22M segment loss from R&D. | Continuing coverage |
Shadow and FARA program cancellations in Textron Systems | Q3: Shadow pulled out of service. Q2: Shadow wound down; FARA not cited as canceled then. Q1: Shadow ended and FARA canceled, leading to restructuring. | No mention of cancellations in Q4. | No current mention |
Cash flow timing concerns due to inventory buildup | Q3: Inventory built due to strike. Q2: $467M YTD increase, partial liquidation expected. Q1: Inventory buildup pressured Q2 margins. | Higher-than-anticipated inventory at year-end; $800M–$900M 2025 manufacturing cash flow projected. | Continuing coverage |
Increasing aviation deliveries and revenue guidance | Q3: Strike-related delays push deliveries into 2025. Q2: Reaffirmed $6B for 2024. Q1: Delivery growth, backlog at $7.3B. | Expecting 190 deliveries in 2025 vs. 151 in 2024; $14.7B total revenue guidance, $6.1B for Aviation. | Continuing coverage |
-
Cash Flow Guidance Lower Than Expected
Q: Cash flow guidance seems lower than expected; what's causing this?
A: Working capital headwinds due to timing of military payments and higher inventory levels needed for anticipated ramp are affecting cash flow. Additionally, we expect higher capital expenditures in 2025 due to business growth and FLRAA preparations at Bell. Therefore, we're guiding towards $800–$900 million in cash flow, which will be more back-end loaded during the year. -
Aviation Deliveries and Margin Recovery
Q: Aviation deliveries were light in Q4 due to the strike; how will deliveries and margins ramp in 2025?
A: We expect deliveries to ramp up through the year as factories recover from the strike, with production capacity expanding and workforce stability improving. The 7.8% aviation margin in Q4 was an anomaly due to low volumes; we anticipate margins to progress, starting 100–200 basis points below guidance and finishing 100–200 basis points above to reach the average. We're feeling good about supply chain and workforce stability for the ramp-up in 2025. -
Bell Margin Decline in 2025
Q: Bell margins have been resilient despite anticipated dilution from FLRAA ramp. What will bring margins down in 2025?
A: In 2024, margins benefited from improvements in the H-1 program, like the Nigerian deal, and strong aftermarket. However, in 2025, V-22 and H-1 volumes are declining, and growth will come from the FLRAA ramp and increased commercial OEM deliveries, which are dilutive to margins but beneficial long-term. We expect margins to come down due to this mix shift but aim to maintain operating profit dollars. -
Supply Chain Outlook for Aviation
Q: How do you feel about the Aviation supply chain for the 2025 deliveries ramp?
A: The supply chain is in a much better position than in 2024. Third-party parts supply is improving, and workforce stability has increased post-contract. We're confident about making the ramp and delivering on our $6.1 billion guidance. -
Strong Demand and Book-to-Bill Ratio
Q: What's the demand environment in Aviation? Any particular markets stronger?
A: Demand and order activity are strong across every model. We've seen particularly strong demand in light jets with the Gen 3 announcements, especially in the CJ3 and CJ4 product lines. We expect sustained demand throughout the year and are planning for a 1:1 book-to-bill ratio due to lead times and product availability. -
Impact of Election on Demand
Q: Any changes in Aviation or industrial demand since the U.S. election?
A: We haven't seen significant changes. Normally, we observe a slowdown before elections due to uncertainty, but this time demand remained relatively steady. Customers feel good about their business prospects, which is positive for private aviation demand. -
R&D Spending Outlook
Q: R&D spending came in under budget; cause of underrun? Is $500 million a good number going forward?
A: The underrun was due to the end of the FARA program at Bell, which reduced R&D spending in 2024. Going forward, we expect more normalized R&D spending across the businesses, and $500 million is a good estimate for 2025. Lower R&D contributed to higher margins at Bell due to reduced funding requirements. -
Systems Revenue Sensitivity to TAS and RCV
Q: How sensitive is systems revenue outlook to outcomes of TAS and RCV programs?
A: The outcomes of the TAS and RCV programs aren't expected to have a huge sensitivity on 2025 revenue. These programs will ramp up over time, and early phases won't significantly impact revenue. They're more important for growth in 2026 and beyond. -
Bell 2025 Guidance Risks
Q: Risks and opportunities in Bell's 2025 guidance for revenues and margin?
A: We don't see a lot of downside risk. The business is mostly backlog-based, with the FLRAA ramp supported by pending 2025 appropriations budgets. Commercial business and sustainment around V-22 and H-1 are well booked and predictable. -
Timing of SCEM Certification
Q: Timing for SCEM certification; is the aviation guide sensitive to this timing?
A: We expect certification within the year, working closely with the FAA. The program is going well, and we plan to deliver the first three aircraft late this year. It's included in our guidance but isn't material to it.
Research analysts covering TEXTRON.