UL
UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, INC. (ULH)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 was muted but broadly in line with prior guidance: revenue $393.8M, EPS $0.32, operating margin 5.1%, EBITDA $56.2M; year-over-year declines driven by continued weak freight, lower auto production YoY, and the absence of last year’s specialty development project revenues .
- Slight misses vs S&P Global consensus: revenue ($393.8M vs $398.5M), EPS ($0.32 vs $0.34), EBITDA ($56.1M vs $57.2M)*; thin coverage (one estimate) reduces signal strength; intermodal loss narrowed sequentially, offering a potential stabilization narrative .
- Guidance: Q3 revenue $390–$410M; operating margin 5–7%; EBITDA margin 14–16%; FY 2025 revenue $1.6–$1.7B with similar margin profile; capex (equipment) $100–$125M maintained, real estate trimmed to $50–$65M, interest expense $48–$51M; quarterly dividend maintained at $0.105 .
- Catalyst: execution on intermodal profitability initiatives (target return to profitability by Q3/Q4), contract logistics momentum including Parsec integration, and tariff dynamics affecting discount retailers/imports could drive estimate revisions and sentiment .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Contract logistics remained the cornerstone: Q2 revenue $260.6M and operating income $21.8M (8.4% margin); Parsec contributed $55.0M; program count increased to 87 including 20 rail terminals, demonstrating scale and pipeline depth .
- Trucking held margin resilience in a depressed market: revenue $64.1M, operating income $3.3M (5.2% margin); strategy anchored in specialized heavy-haul (wind) supports more resilient economics and sequential improvement .
- Management emphasized commercial enhancements: “We have a new executive leadership…rolling out a new CRM…better visibility into our growing $1 billion sales pipeline,” aiming to drive margin growth in coming quarters .
What Went Wrong
- Intermodal underperformed despite progress: revenue $68.9M, operating loss $(5.7)M (OR ~108.2); YoY volumes down 12.9%, tariff-driven import softness from discount retailers with Chinese sourcing impacted volumes in late Q2 .
- YoY compression across consolidated metrics: operating income fell to $19.9M (from $47.1M), EBITDA to $56.2M (from $84.8M), and EPS to $0.32 (from $1.17), reflecting weak freight backdrop and tough comps .
- Elevated D&A tied to Parsec weighed on margins, and trucking loads fell 22.6% YoY with revenue-per-load ex-fuel down 8.9%; segment revenue also pressured by the closure of a prior brokerage operation .
Financial Results
Segment breakdown
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Universal’s results for the second quarter, although muted, were broadly in-line with our previously guided expectations.” – Tim Phillips, CEO .
- “Our intermodal franchise continues to underperform, [but] we are making progress…narrowing our losses on a quarter-over-quarter basis.” – Tim Phillips, CEO .
- “We…began rolling out a new customer relationship management solution…provide better visibility into our growing $1 billion sales pipeline.” – Tim Phillips, CEO .
- “For the third quarter of 2025, we are expecting top-line revenues between $390 and $410 million, operating margins in the 5%–7% range, and EBITDA margins between 14%–16%.” – Jude Beres, CFO .
- “Our goal is to return to profitability in the third or fourth quarter [in intermodal]…full-court press on the sales side…parallel path to streamline operations.” – Steven Fitzpatrick, VP Finance & IR .
Q&A Highlights
- Tariffs and volumes: Discount retailers with Chinese sourcing drove late-Q2 intermodal volume softness; management expects some cyclical uplift in Q3 but remains cautious on import outlook .
- Intermodal timeline: Targeting a return to profitability in Q3/Q4 via sales leadership, pricing, centralization, headcount rationalization, and spot market capture .
- Class 8/auto backdrop: Class 8 orders weaker than Q2 2020; multiple macro headwinds (tariffs on steel/aluminum, soft trucking backdrop, emissions standard changes) temper outlook; autos remain relatively steady with U.S. production shifts supportive .
- Trucking growth levers: Legacy agent-based business pressured by industrial recession; investing in wind heavy-haul and recruiting agents; expanding into other heavier-haul opportunities .
- Guidance clarifications: Q3 revenue/margin ranges and FY 2025 revenue/margins reiterated; capex and interest expense maintained (real estate bottom end trimmed) .
Estimates Context
Actuals vs S&P Global consensus (Q2 2025)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Coverage is thin (1 estimate for revenue/EPS), so “misses” are directional rather than definitive; modest underperformance aligns with management’s muted tone and intermodal drag .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The print was modestly below consensus on revenue/EPS/EBITDA, but broadly matched internal expectations; narrative hinges on sequential intermodal improvement and H2 stabilization in trucking/contract logistics .
- Watch Q3 execution: hitting $390–$410M revenue and 5–7% operating margin with 14–16% EBITDA margin will validate the sequential improvement story and support FY $1.6–$1.7B guidance .
- Intermodal is the swing factor: management targets profitability by Q3/Q4; tariff policy and discount retailer imports remain wildcards impacting near-term volumes .
- Contract logistics durability plus Parsec integration underpin medium-term thesis; expanding value-added programs and rail terminal operations provide scale and cross-sell opportunities .
- Trucking resilience via specialized heavy-haul (wind) supports margin stability; incentives could accelerate cadence in H2 and 2027–2029 project windows .
- Balance sheet/capex: Q2 capex $84.3M, net debt ~$795.5M; FY capex maintained with slightly lower real estate range; interest expense guidance unchanged—monitor cash generation vs investment pace .
- Near-term trading: stock likely sensitive to intermodal profitability milestones, tariff headlines, and Q3 margin delivery; medium-term rerating depends on sustained margin expansion and sales engine effectiveness .