UB
Upstream Bio, Inc. (UPB)·Q3 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Upstream Bio reported Q3 2024 collaboration revenue of $0.607M, net loss of $16.0M, and EPS of $-6.96 as it scaled Phase 2 programs; losses increased year over year on higher clinical and manufacturing spend .
- Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments were $220.7M at 9/30/24; together with ~$268.7M net IPO proceeds in October, management guides runway through 2027 .
- Management highlighted verekitug potency and a differentiated dosing profile; CRSwNP Phase 2 topline is targeted for H2 2025 and severe asthma topline for H2 2026, with COPD Phase 2 first patient in H2 2025 .
- No earnings call transcript was available; Street consensus estimates via S&P Global were unavailable, limiting beat/miss comparisons (see Estimates Context).
- Near-term stock reaction catalysts: IPO proceeds extending runway, Phase 2 execution updates, and comparative potency vs tezepelumab positioning verekitug for potential differentiation .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “Our recently completed initial public offering has provided us with sufficient capital to fund our planned operations through 2027” .
- PK/PD modeling demonstrated verekitug is “highly potent, with an approximately 50% greater effect on fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) than has been previously reported with tezepelumab” .
- Phase 2 programs advancing: CRSwNP topline H2 2025; severe asthma topline H2 2026; COPD Phase 2 startup commenced with first patient targeted H2 2025 .
What Went Wrong
- Net loss widened to $16.0M from $3.1M year over year primarily due to increased R&D and G&A expenses as programs scaled .
- Total operating expenses nearly doubled year over year (+$9.5M) reflecting higher clinical and manufacturing costs and personnel-related G&A .
- Lack of traditional product revenue; related-party collaboration revenue was flat year over year ($0.607M vs $0.621M), underscoring reliance on financing and milestone progress .
Financial Results
Balance sheet snapshot:
KPIs and program data:
Notes:
- Prior quarter (Q2 2024) data was not publicly available (pre-IPO); comparisons focus on year-over-year.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
No Q3 2024 earnings call transcript was available.
Management Commentary
- “We expect to report top-line data from our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials in severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in the second half of 2026 and the second half of 2025, respectively.” — Rand Sutherland, CEO .
- “Our recently completed initial public offering has provided us with sufficient capital to fund our planned operations through 2027.” — Rand Sutherland, CEO .
- PK/PD modeling “demonstrated that verekitug is highly potent, with an approximately 50% greater effect on fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) than has been previously reported with tezepelumab” and supports extended dosing intervals (Q12W and Q24W) .
- Phase 1b data showed “100% TSLP receptor occupancy after one dose, up to 54% reduction in FeNO and up to 65% reduction in blood eosinophils at 12 weeks,” sustained up to 24 weeks after last dose .
Q&A Highlights
- No earnings call or Q&A session transcript available for Q3 2024.
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus estimates (EPS, revenue) via S&P Global were unavailable in our tools environment for Q3 2024; as a newly public, clinical-stage company without product revenue, coverage may be limited. Without consensus, beat/miss cannot be assessed at this time.
- Implication: Analysts may focus on opex run-rate, cash runway, and clinical timelines rather than near-term P&L beats; expect models to incorporate IPO net proceeds and increased Phase 2 spend .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The IPO materially de-risks funding; management guides runway through 2027, enabling completion of Phase 2 readouts in CRSwNP (H2 2025) and severe asthma (H2 2026) and initiation in COPD (H2 2025) .
- Clinical signals and PK/PD modeling indicate verekitug’s potency and support for extended dosing, potentially differentiating versus tezepelumab on efficacy and dosing frequency in severe asthma .
- Operating expenses are scaling with clinical execution; Q3 opex up ~95% year over year, with R&D driving the increase—expect continued elevated spend as programs progress .
- Earnings comparisons to Street estimates are not available; trading will likely hinge on data/package updates, conference visibility, and regulatory milestones rather than quarterly P&L variance.
- Near-term events (Piper Sandler, J.P. Morgan, TD Cowen) may provide additional clinical and strategic color; watch for updates on enrollment, dosing intervals, and CRSwNP study progress .
- Balance sheet strength post-IPO (cash + ST investments $220.7M at 9/30/24 plus ~$268.7M net IPO proceeds) supports multi-program execution without immediate financing risk .
- Risk factors remain typical for clinical-stage biotech (trial execution, manufacturing, regulatory outcomes, competition); management reiterates forward-looking uncertainties .