UG
U.S. GOLD CORP. (USAU)·Q2 2015 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Revenue was $6.88M, down 7.1% year over year from $7.41M and down sequentially from $7.73M; net loss widened to $1.507M (−$0.63 EPS) vs. −$0.18 EPS a year ago as interest and operating losses weighed on results .
- Results included $0.617M of non‑cash interest expense from amortization of debt discount, intensifying the quarterly loss .
- Liquidity and equity improved post‑quarter via a $2.7M sale of Series A Preferred Stock (put/call up to an additional 700k shares), enabling NASDAQ compliance to be regained and closed by NASDAQ’s listing review panel—key stock reaction catalysts .
- No formal financial guidance (revenue/EPS/margins) was provided in the quarter’s materials .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Closed capital raise: “We are pleased to have completed this capital raise which enables Dataram to grow and continue to be competitive in the marketplace.” — John H. Freeman, CEO .
- Additional liquidity access: “With the $2,700,000 raise and the ability to draw on an additional approximately $3,500,000 of working capital… the Company is positioned to fund future customer orders…” — John H. Freeman .
- NASDAQ compliance regained; securities continue to trade on NASDAQ Capital Market, closing the listing review—reducing near‑term listing risk .
What Went Wrong
- Top line softness and margin pressure: Q2 revenue fell to $6.88M vs. $7.41M YoY and $7.73M in Q1, consistent with prior commentary on 13% industry‑wide decline in material cost per GB driving lower ASPs .
- Losses widened: net loss was −$1.507M vs. −$0.338M YoY, with operating loss −$0.811M and other expense −$0.696M (including $0.617M non‑cash interest amortization) .
- Tight liquidity at quarter‑end: cash was $0.033M, equity fell to $0.478M, and accounts payable rose to $2.249M, highlighting balance sheet strain prior to the preferred financing .
Financial Results
Income Statement trend (oldest → newest)
Q2 2015 actual vs. consensus
Note: Consensus estimates were unavailable from S&P Global at the time of request; comparisons to Wall Street consensus cannot be assessed.
Segment breakdown
KPIs and liquidity (balance sheet)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: No Q2 2015 earnings call transcript was available; themes reflect press releases and filings search coverage [ListDocuments results showed no transcript for the period].
Management Commentary
- “We are pleased to have completed this capital raise which enables Dataram to grow and continue to be competitive in the marketplace.” — John H. Freeman, CEO .
- “With the $2,700,000 raise and the ability to draw on an additional approximately $3,500,000 of working capital and the expense cutting actions… the Company is positioned to fund future customer orders…” — John H. Freeman .
- On NASDAQ: “We are glad to have this behind us and with the proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred we expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future.” — John Freeman, CEO .
- On Q1 macro backdrop: “The primary factor impacting our financial results was a 13% industry wide decline in material cost per gigabyte… Despite these industry wide challenges, we continue to see signs of revenue growth through our new partnerships…” — John H. Freeman .
Q&A Highlights
- No Q2 2015 earnings call transcript or Q&A was found for USAU/Dataram in the period. Searched SEC/press archives and transcripts; none available [ListDocuments showed 0 earnings-call-transcript for 2014–2015].
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus for Q2 2015 revenue and EPS was unavailable at the time of request due to data access limits; as a result, beat/miss vs. Street cannot be assessed here. Values would normally be retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Liquidity improved post‑quarter via $2.7M preferred financing and access to an additional $3.5M revolver capacity, reducing near‑term listing and funding risk .
- Despite financing, operational cash remained tight at quarter‑end (cash $0.033M; equity $0.478M), underscoring urgency to stabilize margins and working capital .
- Top‑line pressure and gross margin headwinds persisted, consistent with industry ASP declines; watch for pricing stabilization and mix improvements to lift operating leverage .
- Non‑cash interest expense from debt discount amortization ($0.617M) significantly impacted the quarter; as financing terms normalize, reported losses should better reflect core operations .
- Continued investment in Intelligent Caching Software (capitalized dev costs) could diversify revenue/margin profile if commercialization scales; monitor product milestones and opex discipline .
- Governance refresh and NASDAQ compliance removal of overhang can catalyze sentiment; further tranches of preferred (up to 700k shares) represent dilution/financing path—track execution pace and use of proceeds .
- Near‑term trading implications: sensitivity to liquidity headlines and any signs of margin stabilization; medium‑term thesis depends on sustained revenue growth, improved cost structure, and successful software initiative rollout .
Citations: