Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

VF

Velocity Financial, Inc. (VEL)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Velocity delivered another strong quarter: net income $25.4M and diluted EPS $0.65, with core diluted EPS $0.69; net revenue was $85.8M, up 53.6% y/y, supported by record production and solid portfolio earnings .
  • EPS and revenue exceeded Wall Street consensus: EPS $0.65 vs $0.60 (+$0.05), and revenue beat on SPGI’s definition as well; note SPGI revenue taxonomy differs from company “Net revenue” (see Estimates Context) *.
  • Production hit a record $739.0M (including $23.9M unfunded Century construction loan); NPLs improved to 9.8% of UPB (vs 10.3% in Q2), and portfolio NIM was stable at 3.65% .
  • Funding diversification advanced via two securitizations, including the first single-counterparty deal ($190.9M) plus VCC 2025-4 ($457.5M); liquidity stood at $143.5M and available warehouse capacity at $600.3M .
  • Management tone: confident on continued growth; key call theme was robust demand and market-share gains; notable Q&A focused on REO valuation timing and stable credit reserve/CECL levels .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Record loan production of $739.0M; applications exceeded $1.4B, demonstrating strong demand and Velocity’s share gains .
  • Portfolio credit trends improved: NPL ratio decreased to 9.8% (from 10.3% in Q2 and 10.6% y/y); NPA resolutions realized 102.6% of UPB with $2.8M gains .
  • Strategic funding progress: first single-counterparty securitization ($190.9M) alongside VCC 2025-4 ($457.5M), reducing transaction costs and diversifying funding sources; “fixed income markets are very supportive” .

Management quote: “We continue to build on our strong momentum in 2025, delivering two record highs for quarterly loan production and pre-tax earnings” — Chris Farrar, CEO .

What Went Wrong

  • REO valuation losses weighed on results: net REO loss of $1.6M (vs $1.2M gain in 3Q24), driven by timing and market adjustments on REO marks (management emphasized non-worsening trend) .
  • Securitization expenses increased to $6.4M (vs $3.2M in 3Q24) due to two deals, while operating expenses rose with higher production-driven comp and servicing costs .
  • Portfolio NIM moderating from Q2 peak: 3.65% vs 3.82% in Q2; CFO cited stable spreads with portfolio yield 9.54% and cost of funds 6.27% .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Net Revenue ($USD Millions)$55.9 $69.1 $85.8 $85.8
Diluted EPS ($)$0.44 $0.51 $0.69 $0.65
Core Diluted EPS ($)$0.47 $0.55 $0.73 $0.69
Net Interest Income ($USD Millions)$35.1 $37.5 $47.6 $49.1
Other Operating Income ($USD Millions)$20.7 $33.4 $39.8 $37.1
Operating Expenses ($USD Millions)$34.6 $42.2 $51.9 $50.4
Portfolio NIM (%)3.60% 3.35% 3.82% 3.65%
Total Company NIM (%)3.06% 2.88% 3.39% 3.25%

Segment breakdown (Total loans outstanding by collateral)

Segment ($USD Thousands)Q3 2024Q3 2025
Investor 1-4$2,565,794 $3,089,325
Mixed use$535,796 $670,470
Retail$405,909 $640,005
Office$266,025 $504,282
Multifamily$363,288 $461,237
Warehouse$300,420 $421,276
Other$316,034 $488,774
Total Loans$4,753,266 $6,275,369

Key KPIs

KPIQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Production ($USD Thousands)$476,775 $640,400 $725,387 $738,956
NPLs / Total UPB (%)10.6% 10.8% 10.3% 9.8%
Total Portfolio UPB ($USD Thousands)$4,734,319 $5,445,015 $5,859,653 $6,273,298
Liquidity ($USD Thousands)$75,600 $139,300 $143,500
Cash / Available Borrowings ($USD Thousands)$51,700 / $23,900 $79,600 / $59,700 $99,000 / $44,500
Warehouse Capacity ($USD Thousands)$238,200 $476,900 $600,300
Book Value per Share ($)$14.26 $16.19 $15.62 $16.31
Pre-tax ROE (core, %)19.0% 20.3% 24.3% 24.1%
Weighted Avg Coupon (Portfolio, %)9.18% 9.11% 9.65% 9.54%
LTV (Portfolio, %)67.0% 66.1% 65.8% 65.5%
NPA Resolutions (UPB $USD Thousands / Gain $USD Thousands)$68,619 / $2,305 $76,437 / $1,860 $103,956 / $3,634 $108,031 / $2,802

Guidance Changes

Velocity did not provide formal numerical guidance for revenue, margins, OpEx, OI&E, tax rate, or segment metrics in Q3 2025 materials; management reiterated confidence in continued growth and market health.

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
RevenueQ4/Full-yearNo formal guidance No formal guidance Maintained (none provided)
Margins (NIM)Q4/Full-yearNo formal guidance Target ~3.5%+ indicated by management tone; no numeric guide Maintained qualitative
OpExQ4/Full-yearNo formal guidance; notes production-driven comp and securitization costs Maintained qualitative
Funding/Securitization cadenceQ4/Full-yearExpect continued single-counterparty transactions and diversified funding Newly emphasized

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2)Current Period (Q3)Trend
Demand/ProductionRecord production $640M in Q1; $725M in Q2; strong investor rental and traditional commercial demand Record $739M; applications >$1.4B; market share gains Up
Credit/NPLsNPL ratio ~10.8% in Q1; 10.3% in Q2; strong resolutions above par NPLs down to 9.8%; NPA resolutions $108M, 102.6% recovery Improving
NIM/SpreadsQ1 NIM 3.35%; Q2 NIM 3.82% aided by cash interest from resolved NPLs Portfolio NIM 3.65%; stable yield 9.54% vs 6.27% cost Stable/moderating from Q2 peak
Funding/SecuritizationQ2: four securitizations $985.5M, releases of cash; warehouse capacity $476.9M First single-counterparty securitization $190.9M + VCC 2025-4 $457.5M; warehouse capacity $600.3M; max line $935M Strengthening/diversifying
REO ValuationsQ1 mixed; valuation losses, net -$2.07M; Q2 net REO gain $3.78M Net REO loss -$1.58M; mgmt explains timing of marking vs sale Lumpy/neutral trend
LiquidityQ1 $75.6M; Q2 $139.3M $143.5M (cash $99.0M; avail. borrowings $44.5M) Up

Management Commentary

  • “Portfolio NIM was very stable at 360 basis points above our target of 3.5%.… positive gains on resolved NPAs of $2.8 million” — Chris Farrar, CEO .
  • “First-ever single counterparty securitization… reduce transaction costs… diversify long-term funding options… second transaction closed in early October” — Chris Farrar, CEO .
  • “Total liquidity as of September 30 was just under $144 million… available warehouse line capacity… maximum line capacity… increased to $935 million” — Mark Szczepaniak, CFO .
  • “We believe that our earnings are going to continue to grow and expect positive results going forward” — Chris Farrar, CEO .

Q&A Highlights

  • REO valuation mechanics: management detailed timing differences between initial fair value recognition at REO transfer (“gain on transfer”) and subsequent writedowns to market offers ahead of sale; emphasis that overall resolutions still above prior loan balances, and the quarter’s -$6.3M reflects timing, not a worsening trend .
  • Headcount: 347 employees at 9/30, up ~82 y/y, reflecting growth and production scale .
  • Credit perspective: continued strong collections and favorable NPA resolutions; CECL reserve ~22 bps consistent across five quarters .

Estimates Context

Wall Street (S&P Global) consensus vs SPGI “actuals” and company-reported results. SPGI’s “Revenue” taxonomy may differ from Velocity’s “Net revenue.”

S&P Global Quarterly Consensus (estimates)

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Primary EPS Consensus Mean ($)0.575*0.533*0.600*
Revenue Consensus Mean ($USD)40,367,000*39,868,000*48,885,500*
Primary EPS – # of Estimates2*3*3*
Revenue – # of Estimates1*2*2*

SPGI “Actuals” (for the same taxonomy)

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Primary EPS Actual ($)0.55*0.73*0.69*
Revenue Actual ($USD)34,808,000*55,131,000*54,568,000*

Company-reported results (for comparability)

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Diluted EPS ($)$0.51 $0.69 $0.65
Net Revenue ($USD)$69,084,000 $85,835,000 $85,772,000

Notes: Values marked with an asterisk are retrieved from S&P Global. Differences between SPGI “Revenue” and Velocity’s “Net revenue” reflect reporting taxonomy. Velocity beat consensus EPS ($0.65 vs $0.60) and beat SPGI “Revenue” consensus (reported SPGI actual $54.6M vs consensus $48.9M), while company “Net revenue” is higher by definition *.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Sustained growth engine: consecutive record production (Q2, Q3) and rising applications underpin continued portfolio expansion and earnings compounding (CEO explicitly emphasizes reinvestment strategy) .
  • Credit normalization: NPL ratio trending down (9.8%) with consistent above-par resolutions; CECL reserve stable (~22 bps) suggests disciplined underwriting and active asset management .
  • Funding diversification is a catalyst: single-counterparty securitizations broaden outlets, lower transaction costs, and may support faster execution; warehouse capacity expanded materially .
  • Margin outlook: NIM remains healthy at 3.65% (down from Q2’s unusually strong 3.82%); spread stability supported by loan coupons ~10.5% and cost of funds ~6.27% .
  • Expense mix: production-driven comp and securitization costs increased; investors should monitor OpEx efficiency vs scale as origination ramps .
  • REO valuation volatility: quarterly lumpiness from timing of marks vs realized prices; management views it as non-trend and overall resolution economics remain favorable .
  • Near-term trading angle: evidence of beats vs consensus, improving credit metrics, and funding optionality can support multiple expansion; watch subsequent securitization cadence and application trends as potential near-term catalysts *.

Citations:

  • Q3 2025 8-K press release and financials:
  • Q3 2025 earnings call transcripts:
  • Q2 2025 8-K press release and financials:
  • Q1 2025 8-K press release and financials:
  • Other Q3 press releases (scheduling):
  • S&P Global consensus and actuals: GetEstimates values marked with an asterisk; Values retrieved from S&P Global*.