VG
Venture Global, Inc. (VG)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered strong operational and financial execution: revenue $2.894B (+105% YoY), operating income $1.080B (+75% YoY), and Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA $1.346B (+94% YoY), underpinned by record LNG exports of 234 TBtu and 63 commissioning cargoes .
- Against Wall Street, revenue modestly missed ($2.894B vs $2.969B consensus) and EPS missed ($$0.15 vs $0.276), driven primarily by non-cash, unfavorable interest rate swap fair value changes and revenue timing (DES cargo recognition in Q2) rather than core operations; highlight the strong EBITDA growth and volume ramp despite the EPS miss .
- Guidance lowered: FY 2025 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA revised to $6.4B–$6.8B from $6.8B–$7.4B, reflecting compressed international vs domestic gas price spreads; sensitivity to a $1/MMBtu liquefaction fee change reduced to $460–$480MM from $625–$675MM as forward sales increased .
- Catalysts: Calcasieu Pass achieved COD on April 15, 2025; Plaquemines trains continue to demonstrate ~140% of nameplate capacity; CP2 secured DOE non‑FTA approval, a $3B bank facility, and a positive FERC Final Supplemental EIS, positioning for FID mid‑year .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record LNG throughput and margin expansion: 234 TBtu exported (+93% vs Q4 2024) and EBITDA up 94% YoY; “Our projects exported a total of 234 TBtu of LNG, a new record high for the company… attributable to the project execution discipline and operational excellence” — CEO Mike Sabel .
- Calcasieu Pass COD achieved April 15; facility delivering on schedule to foundational customers post‑COD and realized weighted average fixed liquefaction fee of $8.80/MMBtu in Q1 .
- Plaquemines ramp and performance: 18 trains activated demonstrated ~140% of nameplate capacity; 29 commissioning cargoes at $7.26/MMBtu; temporary 400MW power mitigated power‑island delays to maintain commissioning pace .
What Went Wrong
- EPS miss vs consensus and YoY decline in net income attributable to common shareholders to $396MM (‑39% YoY) driven by non‑cash, unfavorable swaps; “decrease… largely driven by… unfavorable changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps” — CFO Jack Thayer .
- Guidance cut: FY 2025 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA reduced to $6.4B–$6.8B due to compressed spreads and lower assumed fixed liquefaction fee ($6–$7/MMBtu vs $7–$8 prior) .
- Cost headwinds: higher O&M (+$143MM) and depreciation (+$146MM) tied to Plaquemines ramp, tanker operations, and Calcasieu rectification ahead of COD .
Financial Results
Margins (S&P Global):
Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs – Volumes and Fees:
Facility-Level (Q1 2025):
Additional fee context: Company-wide weighted average fixed facility fee of $8.55/MMBtu in Q1 2025 vs $7.40/MMBtu in Q1 2024; Calcasieu forward-sold Q2–Q4 fees at $2.21/MMBtu; Plaquemines contracted 89 remaining cargoes at $7.46/MMBtu .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: No public Q3 2024 earnings materials were found; trend analysis references Q4 2024 and current quarter .
Management Commentary
- “Venture Global had a strong first quarter… nearly doubling our quarterly revenue year-over-year. Our first facility, Calcasieu Pass, achieved its [COD]… Eighteen of the liquefaction trains at our second facility, Plaquemines, have demonstrated production levels of approximately 140% of nameplate capacity… [CP2]… received [DOE] approval… secured a $3.0 billion bank loan… [and] positive [FERC] FSEIS” — CEO Mike Sabel .
- “We are revising our guidance… consolidated adjusted EBITDA… between $6.4 billion and $6.8 billion. This reflects a $6–$7 per MMBtu fixed liquefaction fee range for available cargoes… consistent with recently executed transactions” — CEO Mike Sabel .
- “Our net income… was $396 million… a decrease… largely driven by noncash factors such as unfavorable changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps” — CFO Jack Thayer .
- “On average, if fixed liquefaction fees… increase or decrease by $1 per MMBtu, we expect our consolidated adjusted EBITDA… to adjust… by $460–$480 million, down from… $625–$675 million” — CFO Jack Thayer .
Q&A Highlights
- Forward sales and contracting cadence: added ~45 cargoes since prior report; ~60% of Q2–Q4 2025 production contracted, reducing price sensitivity .
- Long‑term SPAs: appetite growing; expect multiple new 20‑year contracts, including expanded CP2 offtake (e.g., NFE SPA increased to 1.5 MTPA) .
- Plaquemines ramp cadence: 18 trains at Q1 end; complete Phase 1 (24 trains) by end of May; ramp accelerates in Q3 as Phase 1 power island enters combined cycle, enabling Phase 2 trains .
- Tariff exposure: U.S. tariff impact estimated ~1% of CP2 budget; retaliatory tariffs being monitored; overall exposure manageable .
- Gas supply robustness: CP2 laterals (CPX) and connections (Blackfin/Matterhorn) secure feedgas; large NRU systems mitigate Permian nitrogen content challenges .
Estimates Context
Consensus vs Actual (Q1 2025):
Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Implications:
- Revenue modest miss likely influenced by DES cargo timing (two Plaquemines DES cargos exported in Q1 recognized in Q2) .
- EPS miss driven by non‑cash swap fair value losses; operating performance (revenue, operating income, EBITDA) showed strong YoY improvement .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Strong quarter operationally: record volumes, EBITDA up 94% YoY, COD at Calcasieu, and Plaquemines trains performing ~140% of nameplate — underscores manufacturing model and execution .
- Guidance reset reflects market spreads; forward sales reduced EBITDA sensitivity per $1/MMBtu fee, supporting more predictable cash generation despite macro volatility .
- Near‑term stock narrative: mixed — headline EPS miss and guidance cut vs powerful operational ramp and regulatory wins; watch contracting updates and Plaquemines power island milestones as catalysts .
- Medium‑term thesis: de‑risked pathway to CP2 FID, substantial brownfield expansions prioritized ahead of CP3, and a balanced contract tenor strategy could compound EBITDA as trains ramp .
- Fee dynamics: overall Q1 fees improved vs prior year; facility‑level dispersion (Calcasieu higher, Plaquemines lower) reflects commissioning mix and strategy; continued forward contracting should smooth fee realization .
- Cost and O&M: expect normalization post Calcasieu rectification; monitor depreciation/O&M trajectory as Plaquemines ramps and the power island transitions to combined cycle .
- Watch regulatory and tariff landscape: approvals secured for CP2; tariff exposure manageable; ongoing legal proceedings noted in risk factors — monitor for impacts .