Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

VM

VIRCO MFG CORPORATION (VIRC)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q4 (seasonally light) revenue fell 33.2% year over year to $28.47M, and gross margin compressed to 26.2% (from 37.7%) as the prior-year period benefited from an unusual counter-seasonal disaster recovery order; Q4 net loss widened to $5.73M .
  • Against S&P Global consensus, Q4 revenue materially missed $43.0M* (1 estimate) with actual $28.47M, and EPS came in below the -$0.15* consensus (actual -$0.35*), reflecting the absence of last year’s disaster-recovery shipments and lower seasonal volume .
  • Full-year context remained resilient: FY25 revenue $266.24M (-1.1% YoY), gross margin held at 43.1%, operating cash flow topped $33M, and dividends plus buybacks exceeded $5M; year-end cash was $26.87M, shareholder equity rose 20% to $109.3M .
  • Management continues to withhold formal guidance, steering investors to the non‑GAAP “Shipments plus Backlog” planning metric: $316.42M at Jan 31, 2025 (slightly below prior year) and weaker year-to-date comparisons by March 31 due to the abnormal prior-year order; input-cost/tariff and school-funding uncertainties are near-term risks .

Note: Starred values (*) are from S&P Global.

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Strong FY liquidity and returns: operating cash flow >$33M, dividends and buybacks >$5M, capex ~$6M, year-end cash $26.87M, and shareholders’ equity +20% to $109.27M, enabling continued investment in domestic capacity .
  • Strategic stance: management emphasized long-term commitment to domestic manufacturing and service as a competitive buffer against supply-chain/tariff volatility; CEO: “If anyone can turn uncertainty into opportunity, it’s [our team]” .
  • Planning visibility: management reiterated the use of “Shipments plus Backlog” to plan production and financing through cycles; despite a slight YoY decline at year-end, the metric has historically supported capacity planning and prudent reinvestment .

What Went Wrong

  • Seasonal volume shock without prior-year anomaly: Q4 revenue -33.2% YoY to $28.47M and gross margin fell to 26.2% (from 37.7%), driving a wider net loss of $5.73M (vs. $2.34M LY) .
  • Cost and funding headwinds: management warned input costs are “more likely than not” to increase and may not be fully offset with pricing, and uncertainty in public/private school funding could weigh on near-term demand .
  • Forward indicator softening: year-end “Shipments plus Backlog” dipped slightly YoY to $316.42M and weakened further post-year-end given last year’s unusual counter-seasonal order, signaling a tougher near-term setup .

Financial Results

Quarterly Actuals (oldest → newest)

MetricQ2 2025Q3 2025Q4 2025
Revenue ($USD Millions)$108.42 $82.62 $28.47
Gross Margin %46.3% 44.4% 26.2%
Net Income ($USD Millions)$16.83 $8.40 -$5.73
Diluted EPS ($)$1.04 $0.52 -$0.35*

Note: Starred values (*) are from S&P Global.

Q4 Year-over-Year and vs Estimates

MetricQ4 2024Q4 2025 (Actual)Q4 2025 (Consensus)
Revenue ($USD Millions)$42.60 $28.47 $43.00*
EPS ($)N/A-$0.35*-$0.15*
# of EstimatesN/ARevenue: 1*, EPS: 1*

Note: Starred values (*) are from S&P Global.

KPIs and Balance Sheet Highlights

KPIPeriodValue
Shipments + Backlog (non-GAAP)Jan 31, 2025$316.42M
Shipments + Backlog (non-GAAP)Mar 31, 2025 vs 2024$79.09M vs $94.30M
Operating Cash Flow (FY)FY ended Jan 31, 2025>$33M
Dividends + Buybacks (FY)FY ended Jan 31, 2025>$5M
Capex (FY)FY ended Jan 31, 2025~$6M
CashJan 31, 2025$26.87M

Guidance Changes

Virco does not provide formal guidance; management directs investors to the non‑GAAP planning metric “Shipments plus Backlog.”

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Formal financial guidanceN/ANoneNoneMaintained
Planning metric: Shipments + BacklogJan 31, 2025$318.40M LY (reference)$316.42MSlightly lower vs prior year
Near-term cost outlookNear-termN/AInput costs “more likely than not” to increase; potential margin impactCautious
Demand/funding outlookNear-termN/ASchool funding uncertainty could weigh on demand; mid-term signals favorableCautious
Dividend policyOngoing$0.025 declared in prior quarter cycleQuarterly dividends continued in FY26 Q1 at $0.025 (after Q4)Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

Note: No Q4 earnings call transcript was filed; themes below reflect Q2–Q4 press releases.

TopicQ2 2025 (Sep 2024)Q3 2025 (Dec 2024)Q4 2025 (Apr 2025)Trend
Seasonality and abnormal ordersFlagged large counter-seasonal disaster recovery order; warned on tough comps Return to traditional seasonality; shipments concentrated in Q2–Q3 Absence of last year’s counter-seasonal order drove Q4 decline Normalizing seasonality; prior-year anomaly rolling off
Gross margin/COGS controlQ2 GM 46.3%; modestly higher SG&A due to service mix GM 44.4%; higher freight/installation costs GM 26.2% on lower volume; FY GM steady at 43.1% Service cost inflation pressuring peak margin; FY resilience
Planning/visibilityShipments + Backlog YoY growth slowing; flexible model Shipments + Backlog ~1% higher as of Dec 9 S+B $316.42M at YE; weaker YoY comp YTD due to prior anomaly Forward indicator softening post YE
Tariffs/supply chainDomestic model cited as advantage Logistics efficiencies and capital discipline Tariff/input-cost risk “more likely than not”; considering in-house fabrication Elevated cost risk; localized supply optionality
Capital allocationIncreased dividend to $0.025; exploring repurchases, M&A Dividend declared; capex for platforms; debt-free in Q3 FY dividends+buybacks >$5M; capex ~$6M; cash $26.87M Balanced returns and reinvestment
Funding environmentESSER extension noted; bond cycles drive demand Strong collections; lower AR; improved cash Near-term funding uncertainty; mid-term bond signals favorable Near-term caution; medium-term constructive

Management Commentary

  • “One advantage of our long history is perspective... The back-to-back challenges of COVID and supply chain disruptions taught us that recovery is possible and that it can happen very suddenly... I believe that if anyone can turn uncertainty into opportunity, it’s [our workforce]” — Robert A. Virtue, Chairman & CEO .
  • “We have never offered guidance... We prefer instead to focus on preparedness... We have prudently reinforced our balance sheet... and continued to invest in ‘operating annuities’” .
  • “This current year looks like it will represent a ‘pause’... but we see hopeful signs in the mid-term school bond environment” .

Q&A Highlights

  • No Q4 earnings call transcript was available; management’s April 14 press release addressed investor questions on tariffs, planning metric usage, input cost outlook, and funding risks .
  • Clarifications included: “Shipments plus Backlog” as the primary planning tool ($316.42M at YE), potential near-term input-cost increases and margin impact, and the absence of a formal guidance framework .

Estimates Context

  • Coverage remains sparse (n=1): Q4 2025 consensus revenue $43.0M* vs actual $28.47M; consensus EPS -$0.15* vs actual -$0.35*; both highlight a significant miss due to the prior-year counter-seasonal order and lower seasonal volume .
  • Given management’s continued non-guidance stance and focus on the planning metric, estimate dispersion may remain high near-term as funding and input-cost uncertainties persist .

Note: Starred values (*) are from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Q4 headline miss vs consensus reflects the unwind of last year’s disaster-recovery order and typical Q1/Q4 seasonality; FY profitability and cash generation stayed robust, supporting dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment .
  • Gross margin pressure in Q4 was volume-driven; service cost inflation (freight/installation) remains a watch item from earlier quarters, though FY GM held at 43.1% .
  • Forward activity indicator “Shipments plus Backlog” softened versus last year, and management flagged input-cost and funding risks—near-term demand/margin caution is warranted .
  • Strategic posture unchanged: domestic manufacturing/service, selective in-sourcing of tariff-exposed components, and capex focused on platform processes aim to preserve flexibility and margin control through cycles .
  • Liquidity and balance sheet strength provide optionality for opportunistic share repurchases and capex; equity up 20% YoY and year-end cash $26.87M offer downside protection .
  • Trading lens: absent guidance and with a softer S+B trajectory, newsflow on school funding/bond elections and tariff developments likely drive near-term sentiment; dividend continuity and reinvestment cadence are supportive medium term .

S&P Global data disclaimer: Values marked with an asterisk (*) were retrieved from S&P Global.