VC
Vistra Corp. (VST)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Solid quarter on non-GAAP metrics and portfolio actions: Ongoing Operations Adjusted EBITDA was $1.581B; GAAP net income $652M. Management narrowed FY25 adjusted EBITDA to $5.7–$5.9B and raised adjusted FCFbG to $3.3–$3.5B; initiated FY26 guidance at $6.8–$7.6B EBITDA and $3.925–$4.725B FCFbG .
- Versus consensus, Vistra delivered an EBITDA beat but posted modest misses on revenue and EPS; drivers were higher realized prices and nuclear PTC recognition offset by the Martin Lake Unit 1 outage and lower mark-to-market gains YoY . Estimates marked with * are from S&P Global.
- Strategic catalysts: 20-year 1,200 MW PPA at Comanche Peak, completion of 2.6 GW Lotus gas acquisition, plan to build 860 MW of new gas units in West Texas, and an additional $1.0B buyback authorization (total remaining ~$2.2B) .
- Balance sheet and liquidity remain strong with ~$3.7B available; hedging is ~98% for 2025, ~96% for 2026, ~70% for 2027, supporting guidance and 2027 midpoint opportunity of $7.4–$7.8B EBITDA .
- Capital returns: Quarterly common dividend set at $0.2270 per share for Dec. 31, 2025; buybacks since 2021 total ~$5.6B, shares outstanding ~339M (≈30% reduction) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Strong non-GAAP execution: Adjusted EBITDA up YoY to $1.581B, driven by higher realized energy and capacity prices and nuclear PTC revenue recognition .
- Contracting and portfolio growth: Signed 20-year 1,200 MW PPA for Comanche Peak and closed on 2.6 GW of Lotus gas assets across PJM/New England/NY/CA, enhancing geographic diversification .
- West Texas capacity expansion: Final investment decision for two gas units totaling 860 MW in the Permian; CEO: “These announcements underscore our commitment to deliver solutions to meet the growing power demand…” .
-
What Went Wrong
- Outages impacted results: Martin Lake Unit 1 and Moss Landing batteries weighed on performance; GAAP net income decreased YoY primarily due to lower unrealized mark-to-market gains (−$1.671B YoY) and outage impacts .
- Retail softness vs prior year quarter: Retail Adjusted EBITDA was $37M vs $102M in Q3’24, reflecting non-repeat of favorable weather-driven gains last year and timing of supply costs .
- Revenue miss vs consensus*: Operating revenues were $4.971B vs ~$6.178B estimate*; CFO emphasized gains from hedging and capacity but weather did not repeat prior-year tailwinds .
Financial Results
Values with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA (Ongoing Operations)
KPIs and Balance Sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO on strategic milestones: “We… entered into a 20-year PPA at our Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant… and successfully closed the acquisition of seven natural gas plants… These announcements underscore our commitment to deliver solutions… while growing our earnings over the medium and long-term.”
- CEO on demand and hedging: “We are confident in our forecast as we expect consistent earnings from our retail business paired with strong performance from our… highly hedged generation fleet.”
- CFO on performance drivers: “Average realized prices over $10/MWh higher YoY… higher capacity revenue in East… and nuclear PTC revenue recognized… more than offset impacts of extended outages.”
- CFO on capital returns and leverage: “We expect to return at least ~$1.3B per year… With the board’s… $1B authorization… ~ $2.2B remains through 2027… net leverage ratio ~2.6x, with path to investment grade in 12–18 months.”
Q&A Highlights
- 2027 outlook levers: With ~70% hedged, upside from market strengthening and potential contracting; management aims to “trend upwards” as delivery year approaches .
- Hedging philosophy: Maintain disciplined laddering for a large fleet; flexibility to “do more” when prices are attractive; balance certainty for capital allocation with market exposure .
- PJM/ERCOT market views: ERCOT West hub now at a premium; forwards seen as under-reflecting demand; PJM energy curves showing more life; capacity clears support conversions/new build .
- Nuclear upgrades: Potential ~10% capacity increase starting early 2030s; likely needs offtake contracts to proceed, given current forwards insufficient alone .
- Contracting cadence: Multiple deals at various stages; focus on getting “the right deal”; potential for more put points by year-end or thereafter .
Estimates Context
Values with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Implications: Street models likely lift EBITDA/FCF trajectories for FY25–26 given narrowed FY25 and initiated FY26 guidance, but may trim revenue assumptions and adjust GAAP/mark-to-market lines. EPS estimate dispersion is limited (few estimates*), suggesting higher sensitivity to management guidance updates.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Guidance credibility rising: Narrowed FY25 and initiated FY26 ranges, plus high hedge ratios, underpin visibility; 2027 midpoint opportunity suggests continued momentum .
- Non-GAAP strength vs GAAP volatility: Adjusted EBITDA beat reflects operating/hedging execution; GAAP net income will remain sensitive to mark-to-market and outage timing .
- Structural demand tailwinds: Data center and industrial load growth in ERCOT/PJM support higher utilization and contracting optionality; forwards likely understate medium-term fundamentals .
- Contracting catalysts: Comanche Peak 20-year PPA establishes template; management indicates highest-ever engagement and willingness to invest in pipeline development .
- Accretive portfolio actions: 2.6 GW Lotus gas acquisition and planned 860 MW West Texas units broaden footprint and add earnings capacity; mid-teens levered return targets maintained .
- Capital returns and balance sheet: ~$2.2B buyback capacity through 2027 and $0.2270 dividend support total return; path to investment grade over next 12–18 months enhances optionality .
- Trading lens: Near-term narrative favors EBITDA/FCF beats, contracting announcements, and clarity on outages; watch SB6/FERC developments and incremental hedge disclosures for 2027 .