WC
WESTLAKE CORP (WLK)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 was impacted by higher North American feedstock and energy costs, planned turnarounds at Petro 1, and unplanned outages, driving net sales of $2.846B, diluted EPS of ($0.31), and EBITDA of $288M with a 10% margin .
- Results missed S&P Global consensus: EPS ($0.26*) vs $0.69*; revenue $2.846B vs $2.925B*; EBITDA $288M vs $440M*; management flagged ~$80M EBITDA impact from outages and ~$100M YoY energy/feedstock headwind .
- HIP remains resilient: sequential sales +2% on +4% volume with 20% EBITDA margin; full-year HIP revenue and margin now expected toward the low end of prior ranges (revenue $4.4–$4.6B; EBITDA margin 20–22%) .
- Capex guidance cut ~10% to ~$900M and company-wide cost savings target raised to $150–$175M (≈$40M delivered in Q1); balance sheet remains strong with $2.5B cash/securities and $4.6B debt .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- HIP delivered solid resilience: sales +2% q/q on +4% volume and 20% EBITDA margin; operating income rose to $148M vs $129M in Q4 2024 .
- Turnarounds completed: Petro 1 ethylene unit and Geismar VCM tie-ins finished in April/May, positioning higher operating rates and improved reliability going forward .
- Strong liquidity and shareholder returns: $2.5B cash/securities, $4.6B debt; Q1 dividend declared at $0.525 per share; continued buybacks ($30M in Q1) .
- Quote: “HIP’s sequential sales volume growth of 4% was led by solid double-digit growth in Compounds, Siding & Trim, and Roofing…” — Jean‑Marc Gilson .
What Went Wrong
- PEM margin compression: EBITDA fell to $73M (4% margin) vs $220M in Q4 and $253M in Q1 2024; operating loss of ($163M) driven by cost inflation and outages .
- Energy/feedstock spike: ~59% increase in natural gas and ~42% increase in ethane costs YoY; ~$100M cost headwind; price initiatives lagged due to flattening cost curves .
- Working capital seasonality and turnaround cash outflows drove net cash used in operations of ($77M); free cash flow was ($325M) .
- Analyst concern: HIP margin degradation from mix shifts (Pipe & Fittings pull-forward) and lagged resin pass-through; management guided HIP margins toward low end .
Financial Results
Consolidated Performance
Year-over-Year Comparison
Actuals vs S&P Global Consensus (Q1 2025)
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Performance
KPIs and Balance Sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “A strong run-up in feedstock and energy prices increased PEM's cost by approximately $100 million year-over-year… planned turnarounds and unplanned outages… impacted our EBITDA by approximately $80 million.” — Jean‑Marc Gilson .
- “We are raising our cost reduction target for 2025 by $25 million to a new range of $150 million to $175 million… reducing our capital spending forecast for 2025 by 10% to $900 million…” — Steve Bender .
- “While we don't currently expect recent tariff announcements to materially impact our costs or supply chains, the increased uncertainty… is causing some of our customers to pause activity…” — Jean‑Marc Gilson .
- “Our strong investment grade balance sheet with $2.5 billion of cash… and no near-term debt maturities… and our unbroken string of quarterly dividends for over 20 years since our IPO.” — Jean‑Marc Gilson .
Q&A Highlights
- HIP margin trajectory: Mix shift from Pipe & Fittings pull-forward; management’s low-end margin guide contains conservatism; expect sequential lift in Q2 if weather/seasonality cooperate .
- Tariffs/exports: Direct cost impact manageable; export PVC margins narrow but positive; domestic pricing reflects export trends .
- Feedstock outlook: Gas ~3.5 and ethane trending lower in April/May, providing tailwinds for Q2 .
- Outage sizing: ~$80M EBITDA impact, ~2/3 planned turnarounds; assets ramping through April/May .
- Capex flexibility & buybacks: Capex can be tightened excluding safety/reliability; opportunistic buybacks considered alongside growth/M&A .
Estimates Context
- WLK missed consensus materially on EPS and EBITDA, with a small revenue shortfall, driven by cost spikes and outages. Consensus EPS $0.69* vs actual ($0.31); revenue $2.925B* vs $2.846B; EBITDA $440M* vs $288M .
- Given raised cost savings and stabilizing feedstocks, estimates may need to adjust lower near-term for PEM margins and higher for HIP volumes/mix recovery into Q2/Q3, while modeling capex at ~$900M and tax rate ~23% .
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term earnings pressure centered in PEM from Q1 cost spikes and outage impacts; improving feedstocks and completed turnarounds should support sequential EBITDA recovery in Q2 .
- HIP resilience remains the anchor: 20% EBITDA margin in seasonally weak Q1; expect volume-driven improvement into Q2/Q3, though margins likely hover near low end (20–22%) given mix dynamics .
- Balance sheet optionality intact: $2.5B cash/securities and staggered debt maturities support buybacks/M&A and capex flexibility; dividend sustained .
- Model updates: Capex ~$900M, savings $150–$175M, tax ~23%, cash interest ~$160M; incorporate lower PEM margin in H1 and gradual Q2/Q3 improvement on price actions .
- Watch catalysts: Resolution of tariff uncertainty, settling of PE/PVC contracts, epoxy trade actions, and any signs of housing starts acceleration benefiting HIP volumes .
- Stock narrative: Integrated chain and HIP stability underpin downside protection; upside levered to PEM recovery as cost tailwinds and price initiatives materialize .
- Trading lens: Fading cost headwinds and post-turnaround rate ramps are Q2/Q3 setup; monitor monthly resin price settlements and caustic nominations for momentum signals .
Additional Notes
- Q1 2025 press release supplemental: Company-level price/volume variances YoY (-2% price, -2% volume) and q/q (-1% price, +1% volume); HIP (-2% price, +4% volume q/q), PEM flat price q/q, volume -1% .
- Unable to locate a distinct “8‑K 2.02” filing for Q1 2025; analysis relies on the Q1 2025 earnings press release and the full earnings call transcript .