Sign in
BA

Beyond Air, Inc. (XAIR)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q4 FY2025 revenue grew 145% year over year to $1.15M but missed S&P Global consensus of $1.39M; GAAP EPS was ($0.09) versus consensus of ($2.44). Management introduced FY2026 revenue guidance of $12–$16M and guided “at least” $1.7M for Q1 FY2026, while clarifying Gen2 (PH II) is not included in the outlook . Revenue consensus and EPS consensus from S&P Global; values marked with * are from S&P Global.*
  • Commercial ramp continues: >45 U.S. hospitals installed and using LungFit PH; 3 new hospital starts and 3 renewals in Q4. International distribution now covers >25 countries (>2B lives) and “more than a dozen” LungFit PH units shipped OUS in recent weeks; expect OUS contribution to accelerate in 2H FY2026 .
  • Product/regulatory: PMA supplement for transport-ready LungFit PH II was submitted (smaller, lighter, transport-ready); management expects PH II, once approved, to be a major share and volume driver, but timing remains uncertain and is not embedded in guidance .
  • Cost/cash: Operating expenses down ~58% over six quarters; FY2025 cash/cash equivalents and marketable securities were $6.9M (excludes $1.0M GETZ payment post-3/31 and $2.0M additional debt draw). Management cites runway “well into calendar 2026” assuming revenue ramp and cost control .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well
    • Strong top-line trajectory: Q4 revenue rose to $1.15M (+7% QoQ; +145% YoY), with management signaling “at least” $1.7M next quarter and FY2026 $12–$16M, reflecting U.S. hospital adoption and early OUS momentum .
    • Strategic OUS expansion: >25 country distribution coverage (>2B lives); “more than a dozen” units shipped OUS recently; OUS contribution expected to be meaningful from 2H FY2026 .
    • PH II catalyst submitted: PMA supplement for LungFit PH II (transport-ready) filed; management: “we are confident that the introduction of LungFit PH II will play a pivotal role in accelerating our market expansion” .
  • What Went Wrong
    • Revenue miss: Q4 revenue of $1.15M missed S&P Global consensus of $1.39M*. FY2025 revenue of $3.71M also came in below $3.92M* . Revenue consensus from S&P Global.*
    • Profitability/margins: Gross margin remained negative despite improvement (gross loss of $32k on $1.15M revenue); net loss was ($8.04M) for Q4, reflecting depreciation and one-time upgrade costs and a high fixed-cost base .
    • Balance sheet tight: FY2025-end liquidity was $6.9M in cash and securities (pre $1.0M GETZ and $2.0M additional debt after quarter-end), underscoring reliance on execution and financing arrangements to reach management’s targeted runway .

Financial Results

MetricQ2 FY2025 (Sep 30, 2024)Q3 FY2025 (Dec 31, 2024)Q4 FY2025 (Mar 31, 2025)QoQ (Q4 vs Q3)YoY (Q4 vs Q4 FY2024)
Revenue ($USD Millions)$0.798 $1.072 $1.152 +7.5% (calc from , )+145.3% (vs $0.470 in Q4 FY2024) (calc from )
GAAP Diluted EPS ($)($0.28) ($0.15) ($0.09) +$0.06 (improvement) (calc from , )+$0.28 (improvement vs Q4 FY2024) (calc from )
Gross Profit Margin %(135.9%) (gross loss $1.084M / $0.798M) (calc from )(20.1%) (gross loss $0.215M / $1.072M) (calc from )(2.8%) (gross loss $0.032M / $1.152M) (calc from )+17.3 pp (calc)+108.3 pp (calc)
Net Income Margin %(1,674%) ($13.358M loss / $0.798M) (calc from )(1,216%) ($13.032M loss / $1.072M) (calc from )(698%) ($8.035M loss / $1.152M) (calc from )+518 pp (calc)+? pp (requires Q4 FY2024 net loss)

Notes: All “calc” fields are computed from cited source data.

Estimates vs Actuals (S&P Global consensus; asterisked values are from S&P Global)

  • Q4 FY2025: Revenue $1.39M* vs Actual $1.15M (miss); EPS ($2.44)* vs ($0.09) (better than consensus loss) . Revenue/EPS consensus from S&P Global.*
  • Q3 FY2025: Revenue $0.93M* vs Actual $1.07M (beat); EPS ($3.20)* vs ($0.15) (better than consensus loss) . Consensus from S&P Global.*
  • Q2 FY2025: Revenue $1.03M* vs Actual $0.80M (miss); EPS ($5.68)* vs ($0.28) (better than consensus loss) . Consensus from S&P Global.*

Segment breakdown: Not disclosed; company reports consolidated results .

KPIs

  • U.S. installed base: “more than 45 hospitals” using LungFit PH .
  • Q4 additions: 3 new hospital starts; 3 renewals .
  • International distribution: >25 countries covered; access to >2B lives; “more than a dozen” units shipped OUS in recent weeks .
  • Contracting: Annualized contracted revenue was $3.5M on Oct 1, 2024 (context for run-rate) .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
RevenueQ1 FY2026 (quarter ending Jun 30, 2025)None“At least $1.7M” Introduced
RevenueFY2026None$12–$16M Introduced
Inclusion of LungFit PH II in guidanceFY2026N/ANot included in guidance (management clarification) Clarified
Operating expenses trajectoryNext 1–2 quartersCost reductions ongoingExpect further OpEx reduction into Q1–Q2, then scale with revenue Updated commentary

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q2 FY2025, Q3 FY2025)Current Period (Q4 FY2025)Trend
Commercial ramp (U.S.)Q2: hospital contracts +60% QoQ; annualized contracted revenue $3.5M (as of Oct 1). Q3: 6 new hospital starts; double-digit sequential growth outlook .>45 hospitals installed/using; 3 new starts and 3 renewals in Q4 .Accelerating adoption
International expansionQ2: CE Mark expected; Australia authorization; Middle East distributors signed .>25 country coverage; >2B lives; “more than a dozen” units shipped OUS; expect 2H FY2026 OUS revenue ramp .Ramping; revenue impact skewed to 2H
Regulatory (PH II)Q2: PH transport-ready PMA supplement planned CY1Q25 .PH II PMA supplement submitted; transport-ready; expected to meaningfully expand market post approval .Key 2026+ catalyst; timeline TBD
Cost structureQ2/Q3: cost conservation; reduced OpEx vs prior year .OpEx down ~58% over 6 quarters; trough likely June or September quarter .Improving
Cash/financingQ2: $20.6M private placement; debt retired/restructured; runway to June 2026 .FY-end cash & securities $6.9M; +$1.0M GETZ and +$2.0M post-Q4; runway well into CY2026 contingent on execution .Adequate if execution hits targets
Competitive landscapeCylinder-based peers unchanged contracting terms; new offering by Mallinckrodt noted .No change in typical 1/3/5-year contract structures observed .Stable competitive dynamics
Macro/tariffsNot emphasized previously.Limited COGS impact (low-single-digit %) from tariffs; OUS varies by tender timelines .Manageable headwinds

Management Commentary

  • Strategic message: “Our commercial momentum is building… With LungFit PH now installed and in regular use at more than 45 hospitals nationwide, awareness is accelerating.”
  • PH II significance: “We are confident that the introduction of LungFit PH II will play a pivotal role in accelerating our market expansion and advancing our position as a global leader in hospital-based NO delivery.”
  • Guidance scope: “Fiscal 2026 guidance does not include the second-generation system at all.”
  • OUS ramp: “We have already shipped more than a dozen units… we plan to see a meaningful contribution… starting in the back half of fiscal 2026 and beyond.”
  • Cost discipline and runway: “Over the past six quarters, we’ve reduced operating expenses from north of $17 million to just above $7 million… We believe our cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, and existing financing vehicles will be sufficient… well into calendar 2026… provided we continue to hit our internal revenue estimates and control costs.”

Q&A Highlights

  • PH II and guidance: PH II not included in FY2026 outlook; approval timing uncertain; company will update once FDA interactions progress .
  • OUS commercialization: Initial shipments to distributors; expect tender-driven hospital placements with material financial impact in 2H FY2026; usage patterns similar to U.S. where cardiac surgery is on-label OUS .
  • Expense trajectory: Further OpEx reduction expected into Q1–Q2; then scale with revenue to maintain service levels .
  • Contracting models: Introducing a “razor/razor-blade” capital purchase + consumables option in addition to traditional hourly contracts; early customer interest could aid FY2026 revenue .
  • Competitive dynamics: No meaningful change in contract terms (still 1/3/5-year) despite new competitor offerings; Mallinckrodt’s new system considered another cylinder-based option .

Estimates Context

  • Q4 FY2025: Revenue $1.39M* vs $1.15M actual (miss); EPS ($2.44)* vs ($0.09) actual (better than consensus loss) .
  • Q3 FY2025: Revenue $0.93M* vs $1.07M actual (beat); EPS ($3.20)* vs ($0.15) actual (better than consensus loss) .
  • Q2 FY2025: Revenue $1.03M* vs $0.80M actual (miss); EPS ($5.68)* vs ($0.28) actual (better than consensus loss) .

Implications for models: Introduced FY2026 revenue guide ($12–$16M) vs FY2026 revenue consensus of $8.58M* suggests upward estimate revisions if execution on U.S. growth and OUS tenders materializes; PH II approval is incremental and not in company guidance . Consensus values from S&P Global.*

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Commercial inflection is underway, with consecutive quarterly revenue growth and >45 U.S. hospitals; however, near-term prints can be noisy versus small-coverage consensus, as seen in Q4 revenue miss .
  • OUS is the next leg: distribution breadth (>25 countries) and early shipments point to 2H FY2026 revenue contribution; monitor tender wins and initial hospital placements by region .
  • PH II is the structural catalyst: transport-ready PMA supplement submitted; once approved, management expects step-change in addressable market and logistics—yet not included in FY2026 guide; approval/launch timing will drive re-rating .
  • Costs have reset materially; watch for further OpEx decline in Q1–Q2 and operating leverage as revenue scales .
  • Liquidity is adequate if execution continues; follow collections, GETZ/APAC milestones, and any financing developments relative to runway claims into CY2026 .
  • For trading: upside catalysts include OUS tenders, U.S. account wins, any positive FDA interactions on PH II, and consensus revisions toward company guide; downside risks include tender delays, slower hospital conversions, and any PH II review slippage .

Footnote: All values marked with * are consensus values retrieved from S&P Global via the GetEstimates tool.