Question · Q4 2025
Subbu Nambi inquired about a competitor's newly launched flow cytometry assay for myeloma, specifically asking for Adaptive Biotechnologies' perspective on its sensitivity claims and potential pricing advantage compared to clonoSEQ. He also asked Kyle Piskel about the expected pacing of ASP growth for the current year, considering ongoing private payer negotiations.
Answer
Susan Bobulsky, Chief Commercial Officer of MRD, Adaptive Biotechnologies, stated that flow-based methods are inherently less sensitive than clonoSEQ, highlighting clonoSEQ's superior sensitivity (1 in 1 million vs. competitor's 1 in 200,000) especially crucial for blood-based myeloma testing. She noted clonoSEQ's broad reimbursement and EMR integration, suggesting the competitor's assay might serve as a backup for a small patient subset. Kyle Piskel, CFO, Adaptive Biotechnologies, advised thinking of ASP growth as linear for the year, acknowledging that specific timing for key payer contracts could influence the exact pace.
Ask follow-up questions
Fintool can predict
ADPT's earnings beat/miss a week before the call
