AB
Ameris Bancorp (ABCB)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Ameris Bancorp delivered a strong Q1 2025: Diluted EPS of $1.27 (GAAP) beat S&P Global consensus by ~$0.13, while revenue missed consensus as noninterest income softened; net interest margin expanded 9 bps q/q to 3.73% and ROA was 1.36% . EPS consensus: $1.142*, revenue consensus: $276.8MM*, actual revenue: $263.97MM*.
- Deposit growth was resilient despite seasonal municipal outflows: total deposits rose $190MM q/q, noninterest-bearing deposits increased to 30.8% of total, supporting margin strength and funding mix .
- Credit remained stable; ACL rose to 1.67% (model-driven) and NCOs were 0.18% annualized; management skewed CECL scenarios toward downside after a Moody’s tariff addendum (baseline 1/3, adverse 2/3) .
- Guidance/tone: management expects margin to normalize above ~3.60% over coming quarters, reaffirms mid-single-digit loan/deposit growth for 2025, and highlights capital optionality and disciplined expense control; $0.20 dividend declared in March .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Net interest margin expanded to 3.73% (+9 bps q/q), driven by lower deposit costs and positive deposit mix; CFO emphasized margin is “core” with no remaining accretion to backfill .
- Core funding strength: noninterest-bearing deposits rose to 30.8% and brokered CDs remain <5% of deposits; management highlighted bankers’ success in deposit gathering .
- Capital and tangible book value accretion: TCE ratio increased to 10.78%, and tangible book value per share rose $1.19 q/q (12.5% annualized) to $39.78; CEO: “Our strong core deposit base, healthy net interest margin… position us well” .
- Quote: CEO Proctor—“Our first quarter performance showed a strong start for 2025… noninterest-bearing deposit growth to 30.8% of total deposits and continued above peer return metrics” .
What Went Wrong
- Noninterest income fell $4.9MM q/q (−7.2%) on lower gains on sale of SBA loans and softer mortgage banking (gain-on-sale margin declined to 2.17% from 2.40%) .
- Provision for credit losses increased to $21.9MM (from $12.8MM), with ACL up to 1.67% of loans; management cited model-driven reserve build amid tariff uncertainty, not asset quality deterioration .
- Efficiency ratio ticked up modestly q/q to 52.83% (from 52.26%), reflecting lower noninterest income and typical seasonal payroll items, though expenses fell $915k q/q .
Financial Results
GAAP and Adjusted EPS, Revenue, and Estimates Comparison
Note: S&P Global consensus values marked with *, and S&P Global “actual” revenue used for estimate comparison.
Values retrieved from S&P Global*
Margins, Efficiency, Profitability, Credit
Revenue Components (Company)
Segment Net Income
KPIs and Balance Sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO Palmer Proctor: “Our first quarter performance showed a strong start for 2025… nine basis point increase in our margin, noninterest-bearing deposit growth to 30.8% of total deposits and continued above peer return metrics… TCE growing to 10.8%… strengthened our allowance for credit losses to 1.67%” .
- CFO Nicole Stokes: “Our net interest margin expanded 9 basis points to a strong 3.73%… this margin is a core margin, we don’t have any accretion left… bankers did a great job protecting and growing deposits… margin normalize above 3.60% over the next few quarters” .
- Chief Credit Officer Doug Strange: “Reserve build had nothing to do with asset quality… influenced by weightings on the economic forecast; we moved to a 1/3 baseline, 2/3 downside in that scenario” .
Q&A Highlights
- Margin outlook: After a better-than-expected Q1 (funding-side wins), management reiterated normalization above ~3.60% as deposit base normalizes; March NIM was 3.69% versus higher QTD .
- Loan yields/production: Company-wide new loan production ~6.86–7.0% (bank ~8%, premium finance ~6.75%, mortgage ~6.64%, warehouse ~6.71%); margin accretive versus ~3.13% interest-bearing deposit production costs .
- Reserve methodology: Downside scenario weighting increased after Moody’s tariff addendum; baseline retained at 1/3 due to certain components still having merit; build is model-driven .
- Securities portfolio: ~$285MM bought at ~4.62%; ~$283MM maturing in Q2 at ~2.83%, providing uplift to interest income as reinvested .
- Capital deployment: Organic growth prioritized; buybacks opportunistic; sub debt flip-to-float callable to be evaluated .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 EPS beat: $1.27 actual vs $1.142* consensus; revenue miss: $264.0MM* actual vs $276.8MM* consensus. Drivers include lower noninterest income (SBA gains down $3.2MM) and mortgage revenue −$1.4MM, partly seasonal; margin resilience offset weaker fee trends . Values retrieved from S&P Global*
- Trajectory vs prior: Q4 2024 EPS $1.38 vs $1.192* consensus (beat); revenue $276.8MM* vs $276.2MM* consensus (in line/slight beat). Q1 2024 EPS $1.10 vs $1.04* (beat); revenue $246.2MM* vs $258.0MM* (miss). Values retrieved from S&P Global*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Strong core profitability and margin resilience: NIM 3.73% with lower deposit costs and improved mix; management expects normalization above ~3.60% as funding mix normalizes .
- Funding strength is a differentiator: DDA at 30.8% and ability to reprice deposits quickly post-Fed moves support NIM durability and operating flexibility .
- Conservative credit stance amid macro uncertainty: ACL increased to 1.67% due to model changes; asset quality metrics remain stable (NCOs 0.18%, NPAs 0.44% of assets) .
- Fee headwinds near term: mortgage gain-on-sale margin at 2.17% and SBA gains lower; watch for seasonal recovery and pipeline conversion in retail mortgage .
- Capital optionality: TCE 10.78%, CET1
12.9% referenced by management, buyback capacity ($85MM remaining) and sub debt actions provide flexibility to balance organic growth and shareholder returns . - Near-term setup: Expect slight NIM normalization from elevated QTD levels, brokered CDs repricing down, and merit increases (~$1.7MM/quarter) from April; mid-single-digit loan/deposit growth back-half weighted .
- Monitoring points: tariff developments (reserve modeling), mortgage market rates (gain-on-sale), deposit competition (spot pricing), and securities reinvestment yields .
Notes:
- We did not locate an 8-K Item 2.02 for Q1 2025; we relied on the Q1 2025 earnings press release and the full earnings call transcript .
- Values retrieved from S&P Global*