CI
C3.ai, Inc. (AI)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- C3.ai delivered a strong Q2 FY25: revenue rose 29% YoY to $94.3M and exceeded the high end of prior Q2 guidance; non-GAAP operating loss was meaningfully better than guided as revenue acceleration continued for the seventh straight quarter .
- Management raised FY25 revenue guidance to $378–$398M (from $370–$395M) but widened the FY25 non-GAAP operating loss range to $(105)–$(135)M as it ramps investments behind a deepened Microsoft alliance; Q3 revenue guided to $95.5–$100.5M .
- The expanded five-and-a-half-year Microsoft partnership (preferred enterprise AI application provider on Azure, Azure sales quota credit/commissions, MSFT paper, subsidized pilots) is the key catalyst expected to shorten sales cycles and scale go-to-market leverage; management said it has already provided a tailwind in Q2 .
- Near-term trade-off: margins and FCF will moderate as pilot mix rises and the company invests to capture share; management now targets FCF positivity in Q4 FY25 only and expects FY25 FCF not positive, with a likely crossover to sustained FCF positivity in FY26, given higher near-term spend .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Revenue acceleration and beat vs guidance: $94.3M (+29% YoY) vs Q2 guide $88.6–$93.6M; non-GAAP operating loss $(17.2)M vs $(26.7)–$(34.7)M guided; seventh consecutive quarter of accelerating revenue growth .
- Strategic Microsoft alliance: “All C3 AI solutions are sellable by the entire Azure sales organization globally,” with MSFT quota credit/commissions and orders on Microsoft paper; “It is difficult to overstate the potential of the Microsoft–C3 AI strategic alliance” .
- Partner momentum and federal traction: 62% of agreements closed with/through partners; 58 agreements including 36 pilots; new/expanded wins with ExxonMobil, Shell, Dow, Duke Energy, Defense Logistics Agency, and $23M U.S. Army award with ECS .
Quotes:
- “We had an outstanding quarter… seventh consecutive quarter of accelerating revenue growth.” — Tom Siebel .
- “This will dramatically shorten C3 AI sales cycles… Microsoft will subsidize C3 AI pilots and C3 AI production deployments.” — Tom Siebel .
What Went Wrong
- Margin/FCF pressure near term: management expects gross margin and operating margin moderation due to higher pilot mix and stepped-up investment; Q2 free cash flow was $(39.5)M vs $(55.1)M LY .
- FY25 profitability objective dialed back: no longer targeting full-year FY25 FCF positivity, though still targeting Q4 FCF positive; sustained positivity more likely in FY26 as spend ramps into the Microsoft alliance .
- Higher stock-based compensation dilutes GAAP results: SBC was $57.0M in Q2, contributing to GAAP net loss per share of $(0.52) despite non-GAAP net loss per share of $(0.06) .
Financial Results
Key P&L, Margins, and Cash Flow
Notes: Q4 FY24 GAAP EPS not cited in transcript; non-GAAP EPS reported as $(0.11) .
Q2 FY25 vs Prior Year, vs Prior Quarter, vs Company Guidance
S&P Global Wall Street consensus estimates were unavailable at the time of analysis due to data access limits; estimate comparisons are therefore not shown.*
Revenue Mix and KPIs
Guidance Changes
Management commentary on outlook: expect near-term margin moderation due to pilot mix and added investments; still targeting Q4 FY25 FCF positive, with FY25 no longer targeted for full-year FCF positive and likely sustained FCF positivity in FY26 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “It is difficult to overestimate the impact of this [Microsoft] agreement upon C3 AI and upon the enterprise AI market writ large… sales professionals… potentially order of 10,000” — Tom Siebel .
- “Our non-GAAP operating loss was $17.2 million and substantially better than our guidance… We ended the quarter with over $730 million in cash” — Tom Siebel .
- “We expect some moderation on our gross margins due to higher mix of pilots… and [to] be free cash flow negative for the third quarter but remain on track to be free cash flow positive for Q4” — CFO Hitesh Lath .
- “We are no longer targeting to be cash flow positive for the full year of fiscal year ’25… [but] at some point [in] fiscal ’26, we should cross over into being cash positive” — Tom Siebel .
Q&A Highlights
- Microsoft alliance details: C3 AI designated preferred enterprise AI application provider; Azure sales motion provides quota credit/commissions; C3 products listed on Azure price list/Marketplace and “Microsoft paper,” which should shorten cycles; alliance already contributed to Q2 revenue .
- Investment vs profitability: Management prioritizing market share via hiring in sales, customer support, R&D, marketing; FY25 full-year FCF positivity removed; aiming for Q4 FCF positive and sustained positivity in FY26 .
- Pilot economics/margins: Higher pilot mix carries greater CoGS; company will do “whatever it takes” to convert marquee pilots, even at near-term margin cost; professional services remain >90% margin per CFO .
- Baker Hughes: Exclusive oil & gas agreement likely extended beyond June 2025 but not material to outlook given revenue diversification; non-Baker Hughes revenue grew 41% YoY .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus EPS/Revenue estimates for Q2 FY25 were unavailable at time of analysis due to data access limits; as such, we do not show “vs Street” comparisons.*
- Company vs guidance comparison: C3.ai exceeded Q2 revenue guidance high end ($94.3M vs $88.6–$93.6M) and delivered a better non-GAAP operating loss than guided ($(17.2)M vs $(26.7)–$(34.7)M) .
- Implications: Street models may need to lift FY25 revenue and adjust margin/FCF trajectories to reflect raised revenue guidance and higher investment/CF expectations .
*Estimates unavailable via S&P Global at time of analysis.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Revenue momentum is real and broad-based: 29% YoY growth with beats vs internal guidance, diversified by partners and federal wins; watch conversion of 36 Q2 pilots and expanding partner-driven pipeline .
- The Microsoft alliance is a structural GTM accelerator (quota credit, MSFT paper, subsidized pilots), likely to compress sales cycles and scale distribution; this is the quarter’s principal medium-term catalyst .
- Near-term margin and FCF headwinds are the cost of capturing share; management explicitly prioritizes growth over full-year FY25 cash positivity, guiding for Q4 FCF positive and likely FY26 crossover .
- Mix and accounting nuances matter (PES in professional services; demo licenses; consumption vs subscription): headline services % does not necessarily imply low quality revenue, and services margins remain high .
- Federal continues to be a growth engine with tangible awards (Army $23M, DLA, USAF expansions) and likely bipartisan AI tailwinds; watch execution and ramp timing .
- Guidance raised for FY25 revenue but widened for non-GAAP op loss; monitor Q3 delivery ($95.5–$100.5M) and any updates on Azure-driven pipeline conversion rates .
- Baker Hughes concentration risk is diminishing; exclusivity decision by June 2025 should be a manageable event given ongoing diversification .
Appendix: Additional Data