AF
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC (AMP)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Adjusted operating EPS of $9.50, up 13% YoY, and return on equity ex-AOCI at 52.0%; GAAP diluted EPS was $5.83, down due to market impacts on derivatives and market risk benefits .
- Revenue was $4.48B (+4% YoY), with total net revenues up 5% YoY, driven by higher client assets and transactional activity; pretax adjusted operating margin was 26.7% (27% consolidated margin described in materials) .
- EPS and revenue beat Wall Street consensus: $9.50 vs $9.08 EPS*, $4.48B vs $4.41B revenue*; prior quarter Q4 also beat, while Q3 2024 had an EPS miss but revenue beat*.
- Capital return remained a key catalyst: $765M returned (81% of operating earnings), an 8% dividend increase to $1.60 per share, and a new $4.5B buyback authorization through June 30, 2027 .
- Segment trends: AWM grew adjusted net revenues 9% with $10.3B client flows and $8.7B wrap flows, Asset Management margins expanded to 43% despite $18.3B net outflows, and RPS earnings rose 8% on stronger interest earnings and higher markets .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong profitability and capital return: $765M returned in Q1 (81% of operating earnings), new $4.5B buyback, and dividend raised 8% to $1.60 per share .
- AWM organic growth: $10.3B total client flows and $8.7B wrap net inflows (6% annualized rate), with adjusted net revenue per advisor up 12% TTM to $1.056M .
- Expense discipline and margin expansion: consolidated G&A down 5% YoY; Asset Management pretax margin at 43% on transformation efforts despite outflows .
“Ameriprise delivered a strong first quarter... We further demonstrated the benefits of our diversified business and continued to generate strong financial results across the firm. And our expense discipline will continue to benefit us.” — Jim Cracchiolo, CEO .
What Went Wrong
- Asset Management net outflows of $18.3B (retail/model -$5.8B; institutional -$11.5B), including a large client repositioning to passive and Lionstone exit .
- AWM spread revenues declined given prior Fed cuts; AWM pretax margin slipped to 28.5% from 29.8% YoY .
- GAAP EPS fell sharply YoY to $5.83 (from $9.46), driven by unfavorable market impacts on the valuation of derivatives and market risk benefits; change in fair value of market risk benefits was a $497M expense in Q1 .
Financial Results
Segment breakdown (Adjusted Operating):
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We’re navigating the operating environment with the strength of our client relationships and advice-based value proposition... And our expense discipline will continue to benefit us. Our balance sheet strength remains a differentiator.” — Jim Cracchiolo, CEO .
- “Adjusted operating EPS increasing 13% to $9.50... reflects positive flows and activity in Wealth Management, proactive changes to the bank’s investment portfolio, and benefits from transformation initiatives.” — Walter Berman, CFO .
- “Margin for Wealth Management remains strong at 29%... client cash levels remain high overall at $86 billion, which represents a nice opportunity for money to be put back to work.” — Jim Cracchiolo .
- “Asset Management margins reached 43%... driven by market appreciation and expense management actions, partially offset by cumulative impact of net outflows.” — Management .
- “Operating effective tax rate was 17.5% in Q1... expected to be 20 to 22 percent for full year 2025.” — Company .
Q&A Highlights
- Bank NII outlook: CFO expects improvement given shift from floating to fixed and portfolio mix actions; additional liabilities added to balance sheet; ability to manage NII despite rate uncertainty .
- Signature Wealth UMA: CEO detailed a comprehensive UMA enabling flexible sleeves and household-level rebalancing; includes Columbia models among providers; aims to be state-of-the-art .
- Adviser recruiting environment: Packages getting more competitive; AMP added 82 experienced advisers; CEO noted removal of adviser count disclosure aligns with peers; headcount would be up if disclosed .
- Asset Management outflows: Institutional outflows driven by a large client moving to passive and Lionstone exit; retail redemptions increased with volatility; working to build momentum via active ETFs, SMAs, and model delivery .
- Expense trajectory: Consolidated G&A expected roughly flat for 2025; corporate costs similar to 4Q with severance/cloud costs dissipating through Q2 .
- April trends: Cash relatively flat aside from tax-related pulls; recruiting pipeline remains strong; client behavior mixed with volatility .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025: EPS beat ($9.50 vs $9.08*) and revenue beat ($4.481B vs $4.41B*).
- Q4 2024: EPS beat ($9.54 vs $9.05*) and revenue beat ($4.649B vs $4.48B*).
- Q3 2024: EPS miss ($9.02 vs $8.92* actual adjusted beat relative to “Primary EPS” definition may vary); revenue beat ($4.56B vs $4.28B*).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Beat-and-raise profile on capital return: Strong EPS/revenue beats and an upsized $4.5B buyback plus an 8% dividend increase support near-term multiple resilience and buyback-led EPS accretion .
- AWM durability: High client engagement, strong flows and wrap momentum with stabilizing margins (~29%) suggest continued core strength even as spreads normalize .
- Asset Management margin resilience: Despite volatile flows, transformation-driven cost reductions lifted margins to 43%; watch for flow normalization as active ETFs/SMAs/model delivery scale .
- Rate strategy mitigants: Bank portfolio repositioning (only ~15% floating now) and deposit growth underpin NII stability; expect incremental product catalysts (CDs, HELOCs, checking) to deepen client balances .
- Tax rate shift: Adjusted operating effective tax rate expected at 20–22% for FY25; incorporate into updated models .
- RPS steady cash generation: Consistent earnings and strong sales mix (VA w/o living benefits and VUL) remain an underappreciated driver of FCF and capital returns .
- Near-term trading lens: Positive capital return narrative and margin discipline offset the AM flow volatility; monitor institutional flows and macro volatility headlines as potential stock reaction drivers .
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.