AI
ARTIVION, INC. (AORT)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue was $0.099B, up 2% GAAP and 4% constant currency; non-GAAP EPS was $0.06 and adjusted EBITDA $17.5M, as product growth (stent grafts +19% CC, On‑X +11% CC, BioGlue +9% CC) offset a 23% CC decline in preservation services due to the late‑2024 cybersecurity incident .
- Results beat Wall Street consensus: revenue $98.98M vs $94.81M estimate and EPS $0.06 vs ($0.10) estimate; management raised the FY revenue midpoint to $423–$435M and provided one‑time Q2 guidance of $107.5–$109.5M (13% CC at midpoint)* .
- Mix, FX and onetime items: gross margin was 64.2% (down ~40bps y/y), with $4.7M cyber costs excluded from adjusted EBITDA and ~$2.9M FX gains benefiting other income .
- Strategic catalysts: AMDS U.S. HDE launch building (≈150 facilities in IRB/VAC process) and Endospan NEXUS 30‑day IDE data showed 63% MAE reduction; both underpin medium‑term growth and margin expansion narratives .
- Management reiterated adjusted EBITDA of $84–$91M for FY25 and expects preservation services to fully catch up by end of Q3, with sequential AMDS sales growth throughout 2025 .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong product momentum: stent grafts +19% CC; On‑X +11% CC; BioGlue +9% CC, driving overall constant currency growth despite tissue headwinds .
- AMDS HDE launch progressing: “approximately 150 facilities actively seeking IRB and value analysis committee approvals,” with training cadence accelerating and initial surgeon feedback highly positive .
- NEXUS trial milestone: “30‑day outcomes… demonstrated a 63% reduction in MAE vs performance goal,” reinforcing confidence in a 2H26 PMA timeline .
What Went Wrong
- Tissue processing backlog: preservation services down 23% CC in Q1 due to extended lead times from the cybersecurity incident; about one‑third of backlog cleared, with full catch‑up expected by end of Q3 .
- Gross margin modestly lower: 64.2% vs 64.6% in the prior year on mix (lower high‑margin preservation services) and idle plant effects .
- Elevated G&A: GAAP G&A $54.7M; non‑GAAP G&A $53.0M, reflecting higher non‑cash stock compensation and AMDS launch costs; cyber costs excluded from adjusted results .
Financial Results
Q1 2025 actuals vs consensus:
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
Geography (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
KPIs and cash metrics (Q1 2025):
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Given our strong first quarter performance, we are raising the midpoint of our full year revenue expectations for 2025 and remain confident in our ability to grow adjusted EBITDA at twice the rate of constant currency revenue growth.” — Pat Mackin, CEO .
- “Our as‑reported expenses include approximately $4.7 million in Q1 associated with the cyber incident… We anticipate seeking insurance reimbursement… We will exclude any insurance proceeds we receive from adjusted EBITDA as well.” — Lance Berry, CFO .
- “Endospan… presented the NEXUS 30‑day data… the data met its protocol‑defined primary endpoints, demonstrating a 63% reduction in major adverse events relative to comparators… NEXUS remains on track for approval in the second half of 2026.” — Pat Mackin, CEO .
- “We anticipate we will fully be caught up [on tissue backlog] by the end of the third quarter.” — Pat Mackin, CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- AMDS rollout pace: ~150 facilities in IRB/VAC, timing varies by hospital; management comfortable with FY guide and sees upside if approvals accelerate .
- Tissue growth trajectory: backlog clearing ahead of schedule; full‑year tissue growth expected mid‑single digits despite Q1 shortfall .
- Cash flow: Q1 is seasonally weakest; expect FY positive FCF; AR collections lengthened due to manual invoicing during cyber event .
- Endospan option timing and financing: AORT’s option triggers upon NEXUS PMA approval; upfront cost ~$135M net of prior loans; management confident in funding via EBITDA and cash flow .
- FX and tariffs: FX could be neutral for FY if current rates hold; minimal China sales (<1%) and limited non‑U.S. sourcing; tariff impact expected immaterial .
- On‑X supply: Q1 growth constrained; inventory rebuilding; strong clinical tailwinds expected to support sustained double‑digit growth .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025: Revenue $98.98M vs $94.81M consensus; Primary EPS $0.06 vs ($0.10) consensus — a material beat on both lines*.
- FY 2025: Consensus revenue $441.75M vs company guidance $423–$435M (midpoint below consensus), suggesting potential estimate recalibration depending on AMDS launch cadence and FX*.
- Q2 2025: Company guided $107.5–$109.5M vs consensus $107.95M, midpoint signals slight upside and sequential acceleration consistent with backlog catch‑up and AMDS ramp*.
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Broad‑based product strength offset tissue headwinds, enabling a clean top‑line and EPS beat; margin was resilient despite mix and cyber costs — supportive of the “beat‑and‑raise” narrative .
- Guidance raise (FY revenue midpoint) plus one‑time Q2 guide should sustain near‑term momentum; watch for sequential AMDS traction and tissue backlog clearance as catalysts .
- Medium‑term thesis improving: AMDS mix and OUS stent graft growth underpin gross margin expansion; management reiterates adjusted EBITDA growth of 18–28% in FY25 .
- Clinical validation is strengthening demand signals: On‑X mortality benefit in <60 yo patients and NEXUS 30‑day MAE reduction create new market opportunities and tailwinds .
- FX backdrop has improved vs Q4 commentary; company maintains conservative assumptions, implying potential upside to as‑reported revenue if rates hold .
- Balance sheet/liquidity: net leverage 4.0x in Q1 with path to lower leverage as EBITDA ramps; management confident in funding NEXUS option if exercised .
- Trading setup: near‑term catalysts include Q2 revenue beat potential vs guide/consensus, accelerating AMDS adoption, and continued OUS strength; monitor cyber insurance reimbursements and AR normalization for FCF inflection .
Citations: