AH
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered modest top-line softness and margin compression: Total revenue was $327.7M (-0.5% YoY), operating margin fell 620 bps YoY to 15.5%, and Adjusted EBITDAre was $95.4M (-5.4% YoY) .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, APLE slightly missed: revenue (-$0.49M, -0.15%), Primary EPS (-$0.015, -11.3%), and EBITDA (-$2.22M, -2.3%)*; management cited government demand shifts, expense headwinds, and calendar effects (Easter) .
- Guidance lowered: Net income to $167–$195M (from $173–$202M), Comparable Hotels RevPAR change to (-1%)–(+1%) (from +1%–+3%), Adjusted EBITDAre to $433–$457M (from $447–$471M); capex maintained at $80–$90M .
- Capital allocation remains active: two Q1 dispositions ($21.0M), one pending sale ($16.0M), two pending acquisitions ($117.0M), and YTD share repurchases of ~2.4M shares for ~$32.3M .
- Near-term narrative pivot: management expects Q2 to be the worst quarter, then ~1% RevPAR growth implied in H2; muted new supply and targeted sales/repurchases frame a supportive setup if macro stabilizes .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Comparable Hotels ADR rose 1% YoY to ~$157; absolute occupancy and rate remained resilient despite demand shifts . “Demand remained steady across our portfolio, supporting continued strength in absolute occupancy and rate” — CEO Justin Knight .
- Active portfolio optimization and capital returns: sold 2 hotels (gain ~$3.6M), contracted another sale ($16M), under contract to buy 2 hotels ($117M), repurchased ~2.4M shares YTD for ~$32.3M . “We will opportunistically sell assets and redeploy proceeds primarily into additional share repurchases” — CEO .
- Market strength examples: LA RevPAR +20% (fire recovery), New Orleans >20% growth (Super Bowl), Salt Lake City ~10% RevPAR growth; Houston RevPAR +8% on convention/corporate drivers .
What Went Wrong
- YoY margin and earnings pressure: operating margin down 620 bps YoY; Comparable Hotels Adjusted Hotel EBITDA margin down 180 bps; Adjusted EBITDAre -5.4% YoY; MFFO -9% YoY .
- Expense headwinds: utilities +9%, property taxes +8%, insurance pressure; fixed costs weighed on bottom line despite managing variable costs and reducing contract labor .
- Softness tied to government demand mix and calendar: pullback in government travel during March and negative April RevPAR impact from Easter timing; Q2 expected to be weakest quarter .
Financial Results
Results vs S&P Global consensus (Q1 2025):
Comparable vs Same Store (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
Monthly KPIs (Comparable Hotels, Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
Guidance Changes
Management attributed the reductions to a “slight pullback in future bookings primarily attributable to greater macroeconomic uncertainty” and Easter timing impacts in April .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We are disciplined in our approach to capital allocation... should our stock continue to trade at a meaningful discount... we anticipate we will opportunistically sell assets and redeploy proceeds primarily into additional share repurchases” — Justin Knight, CEO .
- “Supply growth for our industry has generally been muted… nearly 60% of our hotels did not have any new upper upscale, upscale or upper mid-scale product under construction within a 5-mile radius” — Justin Knight .
- “Comparable hotels utilities expense was up 9% and same-store property taxes grew 8%… we anticipate some relief moving forward from a favorable property insurance renewal this quarter” — Liz Perkins, CFO .
- “Implied RevPAR expectations for Q2 through Q4 are essentially flat in the back half… we now expect Q2 to be our worst quarter with about 1% RevPAR growth implied for the back half” — Liz Perkins .
Q&A Highlights
- Estimates/RevPAR trajectory: Management lowered the midpoint of FY RevPAR guidance by ~200 bps; Q2 expected to be weakest due to April; H2 implies ~1% RevPAR growth if booking trends hold .
- Transaction market: Focus on smaller, local owner-operator deals for dispositions and high-IRR special situations (e.g., Tampa Homewood) for acquisitions; redeploy into share repurchases when arbitrage vs private market returns exist .
- Segmentation/mix: Government demand normalized to ~5% mix; negotiated business held up; group strong, near-term bookings healthy .
- Capex philosophy: Maintain $80–$90M spend (5–6% of revenues) with flexibility; renovations seen as competitive advantage; monitoring tariffs for timing/costs .
- Cost structure: Variable costs well managed; fixed expenses headwinds; contract labor reduced by 160 bps YoY; teams prepared to pivot if conditions worsen .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: revenue $327.702M vs $328.196M*, Primary EPS $0.1153* vs $0.13*, EBITDA $95.345M* vs $97.563M* — all modest misses; # of estimates: revenue (6), EPS (2) for Q1 [GetEstimates Q1 2025].
- Forward consensus snapshots indicate Q3 2025 actuals beating consensus for both revenue and EBITDA, but Q1 missed (context only)*. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Guidance reset frames expectations: lower FY RevPAR, margin, and EBITDAre; watch Q2 trough and H2 stabilization signals (bookings, April/May weekly trends) .
- Operational resilience: ADR growth with steady occupancy and disciplined variable cost control offset some fixed expense headwinds (utilities, taxes, insurance) .
- Capital allocation optionality: continued dispositions at attractive multiples and opportunistic share buybacks can drive per-share value; monitor Tampa Homewood and Nashville Motto timing/returns .
- Supply backdrop supportive: muted new construction in APLE markets reduces downside risk and enhances upside leverage to demand normalization .
- Dividend durability: regular $0.08/month maintained (annualized $0.96), with an ~8.1% yield implied at April 29 close; board monitors payout vs performance and capital needs .
- Near-term trading lens: post-guide cut, incremental data points (weekly RevPAR, government mix stabilization, cost renewals) likely drive sentiment; Q2 prints are key catalysts .
- Medium-term thesis: rooms-focused, diversified portfolio; low leverage (~33% net debt to total capitalization), and active capital rotation underpin downside protection and potential EPS/FFO accretion via buybacks and targeted deals .
Footnote: *Values retrieved from S&P Global.