AC
ARES CAPITAL CORP (ARCC)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 core EPS was $0.50, down sequentially from $0.55 and below S&P Global consensus of $0.54; GAAP EPS was $0.36 due to net realized and unrealized losses . Core EPS vs consensus: $0.50 vs $0.536*, a miss; GAAP revenue (total investment income) was $732M vs $770M* consensus, also a miss. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Net investment income (NII) was $365M ($0.54/share), essentially flat vs Q4 per-share but modestly higher YoY; portfolio yields stabilized into quarter-end, supporting expectation of more stable interest income in Q2 .
- Credit quality remained strong: nonaccruals declined to 1.5% of amortized cost (0.9% at fair value), and the weighted-average grade held at 3.1; portfolio FV rose to $27.1B and equity/NAV remained resilient at $19.82/share .
- Management emphasized widening spreads and banks’ risk-off stance, positioning direct lending to take share; ARCC declared a $0.48 Q2 dividend (63rd consecutive quarter stable or increasing) and highlighted $6.8B of liquidity and $883M spillover income as support for dividend sustainability .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Portfolio health and credit quality: Nonaccruals fell to 1.5% of cost and 0.9% of fair value, below long‑term BDC averages; grade 1–2 exposure fell to 2.8%, lowest since 2010 .
- Liquidity and funding improvements: Upsized the revolver to $5.3B, extended maturities, and tightened spreads; ended Q1 with $6.8B available liquidity and net debt/equity below 1x .
- Origination momentum and backlog: $3.5B in gross commitments in Q1 and a $2.6B backlog post quarter‑end; 60% of commitments with existing borrowers and improving yields on new originations .
Management quotes:
- “We are starting the year with solid first quarter results, underpinned by a healthy portfolio, stable credit quality, and significant financial flexibility.” — Kort Schnabel .
- “We should see more stable levels of interest income for this coming second quarter.” — CFO Scott Lem .
- “This marks our 63rd consecutive quarter of delivering stable or increasing regular quarterly dividends.” — Kort Schnabel .
What Went Wrong
- Earnings vs estimates: Core EPS of $0.50 missed $0.536* consensus; revenue of $732M missed $770M* consensus. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Sequential earnings pressure: Core EPS down to $0.50 from $0.55 due to lower average market base rates and a lagged impact on portfolio yields; GAAP EPS compressed to $0.36 on realized/unrealized losses .
- Market volatility headwinds: Banks turned risk‑off, syndicated loan spreads widened, and tariff uncertainty could delay new M&A processes; management expects some backlog attrition even as private credit captures share .
Financial Results
Actual vs Consensus (Q1 2025):
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs and Credit Quality:
Segment (Asset Class) Composition at Fair Value:
Guidance Changes
Dividends: Q1 2025 dividend paid $0.48/share on Mar 31; Q2 2025 dividend declared $0.48/share payable Jun 30 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic positioning: “We are entering today’s market environment with a significant amount of available capital totaling nearly $6.8 billion… net debt‑to‑equity… below 1x.” — Kort Schnabel .
- Earnings trajectory: “We should see more stable levels of interest income for this coming second quarter.” — Scott Lem .
- Market share opportunity: “Direct lending… remained open and continues to exhibit greater stability than the liquid markets… transactions… explore private credit solutions.” — Kort Schnabel .
- Dividend durability: “63rd consecutive quarter of delivering stable or increasing regular quarterly dividends… confident we can continue to support a steady dividend level… significant undistributed spillover income.” — Kort Schnabel .
Q&A Highlights
- Pricing and competition: Management already seeing 25–50 bps widening in yields (spread + fees) over the last four weeks; expects private credit to capture more large‑cap deals as volatility persists .
- Tariff exposure: Bottom‑up analysis indicates mid‑single‑digit direct exposure; characterized as exposure not impact, with potential mitigants (pricing adjustments, supply chain shifts) .
- Origination/backlog: Backlog $2.6B as of Apr 24; while some deals may fall away amid uncertainty, private capital’s certainty improves its value and share of the pie .
- Liability optimization: Reduced facility spreads and extended maturities; bond spreads widened recently but diversified funding provides flexibility .
- Dividend coverage: Management does not expect to dip below the dividend; spillover is a lever if needed; today’s environment reduces repayments and supports portfolio stability .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 results vs S&P Global consensus: EPS $0.50 vs $0.536* (miss); revenue $732M vs $769.9M* (miss). Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Implications: Sequential yield declines from late‑2024 were primary driver of the earnings change; with yields stabilizing into Q1 end, management expects more stable interest income in Q2, which may temper further estimate cuts. Conversely, wider spreads/fees on new originations could support revenue/NII over subsequent quarters as deployment converts backlog to assets .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near‑term: Earnings softness vs consensus was driven by lagged yield declines; management expects stabilization in Q2 interest income, reducing downside risk to near‑term EPS .
- Credit quality: Nonaccruals and lower‑risk ratings improved; broad diversification (566 companies, avg position <0.2%) mitigates idiosyncratic risk .
- Deployment alpha: $3.5B Q1 commitments and a $2.6B backlog position ARCC to benefit from widening spreads/fees as private credit displaces banks; expect attractive new loan economics .
- Dividend durability: Q2 dividend maintained at $0.48; $883M ($1.29/share) spillover and sub‑1x net leverage support payout stability through volatility .
- Balance sheet strength: Upsized $5.3B revolver, spread reductions, and diversified funding sources lower liability costs and enhance liquidity optionality (~$6.8B) .
- Watchlist risks: Tariff policy path and macro uncertainty could slow M&A; some backlog attrition is possible, but private capital’s certainty increases share capture .
- Medium‑term thesis: Scale, incumbent relationships, flexible mandate across capital structure, and disciplined underwriting in service‑oriented domestic sectors underpin resilient ROE and NAV stability through cycles .
Notes: All consensus estimate figures marked with * are Values retrieved from S&P Global.