BEL FUSE INC /NJ (BELFA)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 delivered strong top-line growth and broad-based execution: net sales $168.3M (+26.3% y/y), GAAP net earnings attributable to Bel shareholders $26.9M, non-GAAP EPS (Class A) $1.58; adjusted EBITDA $35.2M (20.9% margin) .
- Results materially beat Wall Street: revenue beat by ~$17.4M and non-GAAP EPS beat by ~$0.57; EBITDA beat by ~$3.5M versus S&P Global consensus estimates; beats were helped by improved on-time shipments and intraquarter turns, defense/commercial aerospace strength, and networking/distribution recovery in certain segments (Estimates from S&P Global).*
- Gross margin was 38.7% (down 140 bps y/y), with connectivity and magnetics margin expansion offset by mix and PSP compression; operating margin improved y/y to 17.7% .
- Q3 2025 outlook: net sales $165–$180M and gross margins 37–39%; management cited strong Q2 bookings and expected sequential growth in H2 as key stock catalysts .
- Tariff impact was limited in Q2 (only ~$2.2M of low-margin sales); management emphasized agility in supply and regional diversification, reducing risk to margins and demand durability .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Revenue and EPS upside versus consensus: revenue $168.3M vs ~$150.9M*, EPS (Primary/non-GAAP) $1.58 vs ~$1.01*; EBITDA also beat ($35.2M vs ~$28.9M*) (S&P Global). Management highlighted improved on-time shipments and better intraquarter turns .*
- End-market strength and segment execution: defense and commercial aerospace were strong; networking and distribution saw recovery in certain segments, contributing to broad-based demand .
- Bookings and outlook: strong Q2 bookings underpin guidance for Q3 with sequential growth expected in H2; “Gross margins aligned with guidance, reflecting operational stability” .
What Went Wrong
- Gross margin contraction: consolidated GM 38.7% vs 40.1% in Q2-24 (−140 bps), driven largely by mix and PSP pressures; PSP GM fell 380 bps y/y to 41.9% .
- Tariffs remain a macro headwind: while Q2 impact was minimal (~$2.2M low-margin sales), ongoing tariff uncertainty limits visibility and can pressure customer ordering patterns .
- Operating costs up: SG&A rose to $30.9M vs $24.1M y/y, reflecting scale and integration, offsetting some gross profit expansion .
Financial Results
Consolidated metrics (quarterly trend and y/y context)
Consensus vs Actual (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Note: Company-reported Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 2025 was $35.2M; S&P Global “actual” EBITDA (standardized) reflects a different definition .*
Segment/Product Group Breakdown (Q2-25 vs Q2-24)
Balance Sheet and Cash Flow (as of Q2-25/YTD)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: A Q2 2025 earnings call transcript was not available in our document corpus; we used Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 transcripts and the Q2 press release to track themes .
Management Commentary
- “We are pleased with our second quarter results, which exceeded expectations due to improved on-time shipments and enhanced intraquarter turns… Strength was evident in defense and commercial aerospace applications, alongside a rebound in networking and distribution sales… For Q3… net sales of $165–$180M and gross margins of 37–39%.” – Farouq Tuweiq, President & CEO .
- “Tariffs minimally impacted performance, resulting in only $2.2 million of low-margin sales during the second quarter.” – Farouq Tuweiq .
- “Gross margins aligned with guidance, reflecting operational stability.” – Farouq Tuweiq .
Q&A Highlights
A Q2 2025 earnings call transcript was not found; we highlight persistent themes from the Q1 2025 Q&A likely relevant to Q2:
- Tariff exposure by segment: Connectivity largely unimpacted; Power/Magnetics ~60% not impacted; DR manufacturing subject to 10% tariff; pass-through strategy reiterated .
- AI customer profile: primarily next-gen GPU manufacturers (non-hyperscalers), with engineering-led co-development; revenue ramps as customers scale .
- Networking recovery: bookings improving; expected rebound later in 2025 .
- Footprint flexibility: active shifts from China to India to mitigate tariff risk and maintain approvals in defense-grade operations .
Estimates Context
- Revenue beat: Actual $168.3M vs
$150.9M consensus (+$17.4M, +11.5%)* (S&P Global) .* - EPS beat: Actual Primary/non-GAAP EPS $1.58 vs
$1.01 consensus (+$0.57, +56%)* (S&P Global) .* - EBITDA beat: Actual standardized EBITDA ~$32.5M vs
$28.9M consensus (+$3.6M, +12%); company Adjusted EBITDA was higher at $35.2M (definition difference) .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Implication: Sell-side models should raise H2 revenue/EPS on bookings strength, intraquarter turns, defense/aerospace demand, and emerging networking/distribution recovery. Tariff sensitivity appears lower than feared given Q2 impact and regionalization strategy .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q2 was a clean beat on revenue and EPS; operational cadence (on-time shipments, intraquarter turns) and strong end-market mix drove upside .
- Defense/commercial aerospace remain powerful demand anchors; Enercon integration continues to diversify and elevate margin profile over time .
- Networking/distribution recovery is materializing; watch bookings trajectory and PSP margin mix as recovery progresses .
- Tariff risk appears contained; Q2 impact minimal; continued regional diversification (India/U.S./Mexico/UK) lowers volatility and supports margin stability .
- Q3 guide ($165–$180M; GM 37–39%) signals sequential growth into H2; strong bookings support near-term trading setup .
- Balance sheet improved (debt reduced to $250M, equity to $404.7M); ongoing cash generation and debt paydown provide optionality for procurement and operating initiatives .
- Dividend maintained; capital return complements growth execution and defensive end-market exposure .
Notes:
- A Q2 2025 earnings call transcript was not found in our document set; we relied on the Q2 press release, Q1/Q4 transcripts, and related press releases for synthesis .
- All company metrics cited are from Bel Fuse’s press releases and 8-Ks. Estimates and consensus comparisons are from S&P Global (values marked with *).