BHF Q3 2024: Q4 Reinsurance Deal to Improve Capital Efficiency
- Pending reinsurance agreements and additional flow reinsurance opportunities: Executives highlighted multiple in-force reinsurance negotiations, including a specific agreement expected to close in the fourth quarter, which could improve capital efficiency and lower risk-based capital requirements.
- Strong new business momentum supported by robust sales: Management emphasized that there are no plans to slow down sales—citing a very good October performance—and noted that their capital strategy, including a new hedging program for Shield products, positions them well for continued strong sales.
- Potential for investment portfolio optimization: When asked about optimizing the investment portfolio, management confirmed that exploring such opportunities is on the table, which could further enhance overall financial performance.
- Normalized statutory loss impact: The company reported a $300 million normalized statutory loss in Q3 driven in part by continuing new business strain, suggesting a potential for further negative earnings pressure.
- Adverse interest rate environment: The quarter saw a modest loss attributed to a significant change in the interest rate environment, highlighting ongoing vulnerability to market volatility.
- Uncertainty in legacy hedging strategy: The development of a separate hedging strategy for the legacy block remains incomplete and may expose the company to further risks and capital pressures in the future.
-
RBC Stability
Q: Has RBC ratio peaked?
A: Management noted they don’t provide precise forecasts, but with $1.3B in liquid assets and a pending reinsurance deal, they expect the RBC ratio to be near the lower end of their 400%-450% target range, with improved strain management (see ). -
Risk Management
Q: Added risk management expertise?
A: They have boosted risk management by hiring additional hedging and finance professionals over the past six months to better address new business strain (see ). -
In-Force Impact
Q: Why drag on RBC from legacy?
A: Legacy in-force contracts are still weighing on the RBC due to the complexity of combined hedging; efforts to simplify these are underway (see ). -
Legacy Hedging
Q: Future hedging for legacy block?
A: They are developing a separate hedging strategy for the closed legacy block, with work expected to continue into 2025 (see ). -
Reinsurance Deals
Q: More reinsurance opportunities?
A: The team is evaluating various in-force and flow reinsurance opportunities, with one significant deal expected to close in Q4 (see ). -
Tactical Rates
Q: Any tactical rate moves?
A: They are not engaging in tactical rate positioning; the modest losses were due to a steepening yield curve affecting short-term rates (see ). -
Investment Optimization
Q: Optimize investment portfolio?
A: While potential exists for optimizing their investment portfolio, including possibly an IMA, no concrete plans have been announced (see ). -
Buyouts/Annuitization
Q: Consider buyouts or annuitizations?
A: They have historically avoided buyouts due to distributor concerns and disruption, choosing instead to focus on core strategies (see ). -
Market Scope
Q: Is TAM entire closed block?
A: They view the total addressable market broadly and are considering all possibilities, though prioritization details are yet to be finalized (see ). -
Norm Stat Earnings
Q: Long-term norm stat trends?
A: They expect a gradual improvement in statutory free cash flow as the legacy block runs off, with detailed projections to be provided next year (see ). -
Product Structure
Q: Any product changes?
A: There are no fundamental changes to the product offering; only the hedging strategies are being updated to reflect current needs (see ). -
Reinsurance Details
Q: Onshore vs offshore deal?
A: They declined to elaborate on whether the reinsurance will be onshore or offshore, only affirming confidence in closing the deal in Q4 (see ). -
Shield Sales
Q: Will Shield sales slow down?
A: Management expects Shield sales to continue strongly, driven by robust new business and improved hedging processes (see ). -
Free Cash Flow
Q: Free cash flow timing?
A: Statutory free cash flow projections will be delayed until the new hedging strategy is fully established (see ). -
Runoff Earnings
Q: Runoff segment earnings steady?
A: Although the runoff segment experienced some volatility, margins were in line with expectations, offset by solid performance in the life segment (see ). -
Reinsurer Switch
Q: Impact of reinsurer switch?
A: Switching reinsurers in June helped bolster fixed annuity sales, resulting in a noticeable rebound in that part of the business (see ).