BH
BLACK HILLS CORP /SD/ (BKH)·Q3 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2024 EPS of $0.35 and revenue of $401.6M; year-over-year decline versus Q3 2023 ($0.67 EPS; $407.1M revenue) as new rates and rider recovery and customer growth were offset by higher O&M, depreciation, unplanned generation outages, and higher interest expense .
- Guidance reaffirmed: FY 2024 EPS $3.80–$4.00; CFO tightened O&M outlook to “no more than 2.5%” YoY increase versus prior ~3.5%, a positive surprise for expense discipline .
- Regulatory momentum: Arkansas Gas final rates (+$25.4M new annual revenue) took effect in October; Iowa Gas settlement filed (+$15M new annual revenue), final rates expected Q1 2025 .
- Strategic growth catalysts: progressing Ready Wyoming 260-mile transmission, Colorado Clean Energy Plan resource additions, and expected data center EPS contribution to rise from ~5% in 2023 to ≥10% by 2028; serving Meta’s new AI data center by 2026 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Expense discipline and guidance confidence: “We are on track to deliver on our earnings guidance… despite mild weather and other unexpected cost pressures” and O&M increase held to ≤2.5% YoY in 2024 .
- Regulatory wins: Arkansas Gas rates effective October; Iowa settlement advancing; Colorado Electric rate review on schedule—supporting margin growth and recovery timeliness .
- Strategic load growth: “We look forward to serving Meta’s new AI data center in Cheyenne… by 2026,” with data center EPS contribution expected to grow to ≥10% by 2028 .
What Went Wrong
- Unplanned outages and lower market sales pressured results: Electric Utilities operating income down $17.9M YoY; off-system sales down, and generating fleet availability impacted by Wygen I and Colorado IPP outages .
- Higher costs: O&M up (insurance premiums, employee costs, outage-related expenses), depreciation higher with assets placed in service, and net interest expense up $4.2M YoY .
- Gas distribution revenue headwinds: commodity price declines weighed on reported revenues (mitigated by pass-through mechanisms), quantities sold modestly down YoY .
Financial Results
Consolidated Results vs Prior Periods and Estimates
Notes: Estimates were not retrievable at time of request and are therefore not included (S&P Global data unavailable).
Profitability (Operating Margin % – calculated)
Footnote: Operating Margin % is computed from cited revenue and operating income values.
Segment Performance – Q3 2024 vs Q3 2023
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO on guidance and strategy: “We remain confident in our financial outlook… We’re on track to deliver on our earnings guidance range of $3.80 to $4 per share… successfully met the impacts of mild weather, unplanned generation outages and increased insurance expense” .
- CEO on strategic projects: “Our 260-mile Ready Wyoming transmission project remains on track… We… look forward to serving Meta’s new AI data center in Cheyenne, Wyoming by 2026” .
- CFO on expense management: “We are delivering new margins and managing our costs… expect our annual O&M cost increase in 2024 to be no more than 2.5% over 2023” .
- Utilities SVP on resources: “Colorado Commission… authorized 100 MW utility-owned solar, 50 MW utility-owned battery, and a 200 MW solar PPA… expect a final written decision before year-end” .
Q&A Highlights
- Unplanned outages impact: Outages carried over from Q2 to early Q3; CFO quantified EPS impact at ~$0.03 for the quarter and ~$0.05 YTD for O&M component, with total impact including margins shown on slides .
- Guidance cadence: Management reaffirmed FY EPS range but declined to indicate positioning within the range .
- Large load/customer cadence: Data centers ramp “relatively smooth,” Meta to begin in late 2026, continued land purchases and expansion imply multi-year growth .
- AI demand: Interest strengthening; potential to serve AI centers beyond Cheyenne; interties support reliability and flexibility .
- O&M into Q4: O&M favored earlier in year; focus remains on covering outages, insurance; diligence on capital investments supports 4–6% LT EPS growth .
- Maintenance pull-forward: Leveraged outage windows to bring forward longer-term maintenance, potentially benefiting future periods .
- Tariff replication: Management flexible in adopting similar large-load tariffs in CO/SD to balance customer and shareholder interests .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus estimates from S&P Global were unavailable at retrieval time, so explicit “vs. estimates” comparisons are not provided. Expect sell-side models to incorporate: tighter O&M growth (≤2.5% vs ~3.5% prior), regulatory rate outcomes, continued mild weather assumptions, outage normalization, and incremental data center load ramp .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Expense discipline improved: O&M guidance lowered to ≤2.5% YoY, countering weather, interest, and outage headwinds—supportive for near-term EPS delivery within the reaffirmed range .
- Margin visibility rising: Arkansas and Iowa rate outcomes, Colorado Electric case, and data center loads provide multi-year margin drivers .
- Outage headwinds likely transient: Fleet availability remained robust; maintenance advanced during outages should reduce future risk .
- Capital plan intact, funding de-risked: Achieved 55% debt to capitalization target; completed equity issuance within guidance range; liquidity solid .
- Structural AI/data center growth: Meta service by 2026; EPS contribution path to ≥10% by 2028 under capital-light model improves ROIC profile .
- Regulatory cadence sustainable: Expect 3–4 rate reviews annually to reduce lag and support investment recovery .
- Dividend dependability: $0.65/share quarterly; 54 consecutive years of increases, aligned with earnings growth .
Cross-References and Disclosures
- All quantitative results and operational details are drawn from Black Hills’ Q3 2024 8-K and press release, Q3 2024 earnings call transcript, and relevant Q1/Q2 2024 documents: .
- Operating margin figures are computed from cited revenue and operating income values.
- S&P Global consensus estimates were unavailable at time of retrieval; therefore, “vs estimates” cells are shown as N/A.