Q4 2023 Earnings Summary
- CEG is exploring significant opportunities to increase their energy production capacity through optimization of their existing fleet, upgrades, M&A activities, and unique opportunities to bring megawatts online.
- CEG has been an opportunistic consolidator in the retail energy market, focusing on profitable growth by adding customers that enhance margins, not just increasing volume.
- CEG's management reaffirms their commitment to delivering on promises and adapting to the evolving marketplace, positioning the company for future success.
- Limited Growth Potential Due to High Capacity Utilization: The company's existing nuclear fleet is already running at a high capacity factor, and they are not planning to build new nuclear plants, which limits their ability to grow production significantly in the foreseeable future.
- Uncertainty in Capital Allocation and M&A Strategy: Management expressed uncertainty about where the greatest impact for investments would be, indicating potential challenges in efficiently allocating capital between M&A opportunities and share buybacks.
- Potential Increase in Cash Tax Rate Affecting Free Cash Flow: The company's functional cash tax rate is expected to be higher in the future due to working through accumulated tax credits and changes in capital investments and bonus depreciation, which could impede free cash flow growth year-to-year.
-
Free Cash Flow Growth
Q: Will free cash flow grow along with earnings over time?
A: Management expects free cash flow before growth to increase similarly to earnings over time, though higher cash tax rates due to using up accumulated tax credits may affect it slightly. They anticipate good follow-through on free cash flow despite possible year-to-year variations in nuclear fuel spend and base CapEx. -
Retail Power Margins Outlook
Q: Why do retail power margins decline from $1.75 to $0.50?
A: The projected decrease in retail power margins from about $1.75 above the 13-year average in 2024 to $0.50 in 2025 reflects conservative assumptions. Management assumes unsold volumes revert to historical average margins but believes there's potential upside if current market conditions persist. Strong margins in recent contracts suggest opportunities to sustain higher margins. -
Use of Free Cash Flow
Q: How will you use the unallocated $3 billion capital?
A: The company plans to deploy the $3.1 to $3.5 billion unallocated capital toward a mix of share buybacks and growth investments. Some of this will impact base EPS through share count reduction and reinvestment in projects with contractual visibility. They aim for flexibility without committing to a single capital deployment strategy. -
M&A Strategy
Q: What assets are targeted in your M&A strategy?
A: The company is focused on both the commercial business and nuclear asset base for M&A. They're interested in acquiring young, dual-unit nuclear sites that fit their asset mix and return profile. Acquisitions must come at the right price, and they remain disciplined, weighing opportunities against share buybacks for investor returns. -
O&M and CapEx Increases
Q: Why are O&M expenses and CapEx rising faster than EBITDA?
A: O&M expenses increased due to the acquisition of STP and higher performance-based compensation linked to extraordinary commercial results. CapEx timing varies annually; they've advanced capital for high-return projects like uprates. Management is comfortable with the O&M profile relative to earnings expectations. -
Transition to EPS Guidance
Q: Why shift from EBITDA to EPS guidance?
A: The shift to EPS guidance is driven by the nuclear PTC, which impacts after-tax net income but adds volatility to EBITDA calculations. EPS better reflects their strong investment-grade profile, modest leverage, and compelling growth story, aligning them with companies they resemble more closely. -
Attribute Values and Opportunities
Q: How are you prioritizing attribute value opportunities like hydrogen?
A: Management sees selling 24/7 solutions to data center customers as the most material opportunity. They are cautiously pursuing hydrogen projects, pending favorable DOE rules, but may suspend investment if outcomes aren't favorable. Deal timing is uncertain due to complexity, but incentives are aligned for speed.