Community Healthcare Trust - Earnings Call - Q2 2025

Executive Summary

• Q2 2025 results were impacted by one-time items tied to a troubled geriatric behavioral hospital tenant and executive severance, driving a GAAP net loss of $12.6M (-$0.50 EPS) and FFO per share of $0.23; AFFO per share was $0.50. Revenue of $29.1M missed S&P Global consensus ($30.3M) mainly due to a $1.7M interest receivable reversal; excluding this item, management indicated revenue would have been ~$30.7M, implying underlying growth.
• The Board raised the quarterly dividend to $0.4725 (annualized $1.89), continuing the streak of increases since IPO.
• Strategic update: LOI signed to sell the geriatric psych tenant’s business to a new operator who would sign new leases; CHCT fully reserved notes and interest and is negotiating, though timing is uncertain.
• Balance sheet and capital: modest leverage with net debt/total capitalization at 41.6%; management prefers capital recycling and revolver over equity ATM given the share price, and did not issue ATM shares in Q2.
• Near-term catalysts: closing of pipeline acquisitions (one IRF closed July 9 for $26.5M at ~9.4% return; six properties under definitive agreements totaling ~$146M at 9.1%–9.75% returns), progress on tenant sale, and potential occupancy improvements (+100 bps into 2026).

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

• Dividend increased to $0.4725; “We are proud to have raised our dividend every quarter since our IPO”.
• Underlying revenue growth: CFO noted that excluding the $1.7M interest reversal, revenue would have been ~$30.7M vs $30.1M in Q1 (+2.2% QoQ).
• Accretive growth pipeline: Acquired an IRF for $26.5M at ~9.4% return; six additional properties under definitive agreements totaling ~$146M at 9.1%–9.75% returns.

What Went Wrong

• Reported revenue miss: $29.1M vs S&P Global consensus $30.3M due to the $1.7M interest receivable reversal tied to the geriatric psych tenant (reducing FFO/AFFO $0.06 per share).
• One-time severance/stock-based comp: ~$5.9M charges (including ~$4.6M accelerated non-cash comp) reduced FFO/share by ~$0.22.
• Continued tenant risk: Full reserve on $8.7M notes receivable and ongoing negotiations; while cash rent/interest received increased ($260K vs $165K QoQ), uncertainty remains until sale closes.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Good day, everyone, and welcome to Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated 2025 second quarter earnings release conference call. On the call today, the company will discuss its 2025 second quarter financial results. We'll also discuss progress made in various aspects of its business. Following the remarks, the phone lines will be open for a question and answer session. The company's earnings release was distributed last evening and has also been posted on its website, www.chct.reit. The company wants to emphasize that some of the information that may be discussed on this call will be based on information as of today, July 30th, 2025, and may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainty. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in such statements.

For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, you should review the company's disclosures regarding forward-looking statements in its earnings release, as well as its risk factors and MD&A in its SEC filings. The company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements, whether as the result of new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as may be required by law. During the call, the company will discuss GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation between the two is available in its earnings release, which is posted on its website. Call participants are advised that this call is being recorded for playback purposes. An archive of the call will be made available on the company's investor relations website for approximately 30 days and is the property of the company. This call may not be recorded or otherwise reproduced or distributed without the company's prior written permission.

Now I'd like to turn the conference call over to Dave Dupuy, CEO of Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated. Please go ahead.

Speaker 0

Great, thanks Jamie, and good morning. Thank you for joining us today for our 2025 second quarter conference call. On the call with me today is Bill Monroe, our Chief Financial Officer, Leigh Ann Stach, our Chief Accounting Officer, and our new Senior Vice President of Asset Management, Mark Kearns. Our earnings announcement and supplemental data report were released last night and furnished on Form 8-K, along with our quarterly report on Form 10-Q. In addition, an updated investor presentation was posted to our website last night. As previously announced, Tim Meyer departed the company effective May 31. We are excited to have Mark on board as our new Senior Vice President of Asset Management. He has over 25 years of healthcare real estate experience, including leasing and managing medical outpatient properties, most recently in leadership positions with Welltower and Healthpeak.

Bill will review the financial details in his comments, but I wanted to provide an update on the status of our geriatric behavioral hospital tenant. Although their performance has stabilized over the last couple of quarters, they have been unable to pay us full rent and interest. As discussed on previous calls, the tenant has been exploring strategic alternatives, including a potential sale of its business. On July 17, 2025, the tenant signed a letter of intent for the sale of the operations of all six of its hospitals to an experienced behavioral healthcare operator and is under exclusivity with that buyer. Among other terms and conditions of the sale, the buyer would sign new or amended leases for the six geriatric hospitals owned by CHCT. The tenant and CHCT are in active negotiations with the buyer, so we can't share more details at this time.

While we can't provide certainty that the transaction will close, we hope to share more information over the next couple of quarters as we move through the process. As disclosed in our filings, we determined that the collectibility of the remaining interest balance and unreserved notes related to this tenant were not reasonably assured. Our notes and interest are now fully reserved for this tenant, and rent continues to be recognized on a cash basis. During the quarter, we received $260,000 from the tenant that is included in revenue, compared with $165,000 in the prior quarter. As for other components of the business, our occupancy decreased slightly from 90.9% to 90.7% during the quarter, but we continue to see good leasing activity in the portfolio.

We have three properties, or significant portions of them, that are undergoing redevelopment or significant renovations, with long-term tenants in place when the renovations or redevelopment is complete. One of those projects commenced its lease on July 1. Due to some free rent built into the lease, we expect this property to contribute AFFO later in the fourth quarter of 2025 and into the first quarter of 2026. Though we did not acquire any properties during the second quarter of 2025, on July 9, we acquired an inpatient rehabilitation facility after completion of construction for a purchase price of $26.5 million. We entered into a new lease with a lease expiration in 2040 and an anticipated annual return of approximately 9.4%. Also, we have signed definitive purchase and sale agreements for six properties to be acquired after completion and occupancy for an aggregate expected investment of $146 million.

The expected return on these investments should range from 9.1% to 9.75%. We expect to close on one of these properties in the fourth quarter, with the remaining five properties closing throughout 2026 and 2027. Considering the company's current share price, we did not issue any shares under our ATM last quarter. However, we are actively working on capital recycling opportunities and would anticipate having sufficient capital from selected asset sales, coupled with our revolver capacity, to fund near-term acquisitions. We had one very small disposition in the second quarter, providing approximately $600,000 of proceeds and generating a small capital gain. Going forward, we will evaluate the best uses of our capital, all while maintaining modest leverage levels. To finish up, we declared our dividend for the second quarter and raised it to $0.4725 per common share. This equates to an annualized dividend of $1.89 per share.

We are proud to have raised our dividend every quarter since our IPO. That takes care of the items I wanted to cover, so I'll hand things off to Bill to discuss the numbers. Thank you, Dave. I will now provide more details on our second quarter financial performance. Let me start by detailing the impacts to our financials related to the geriatric psychiatric hospital tenant that Dave described earlier. Other operating interest revenue in the second quarter was negatively impacted by the reversal of $1.7 million of interest receivable from this tenant. In addition, we recorded an $8.7 million credit loss reserve on the notes receivable from this tenant, which utilized the signed letter of intent's valuation of the tenant's operations. Next, let me detail the impact related to the departure of our former Executive Vice President of Asset Management.

Within general and administrative expense, we received a charge of $5.9 million for severance and transition-related expenses. Combining the reversal of the interest receivable with the severance charges reduced second quarter FFO by $0.28 and AFFO by $0.06 per diluted common share. Moving back to the top of our income statement, total revenue for the second quarter of 2025 was $29.1 million, but if you exclude the $1.7 million reversal of interest receivable I just mentioned from the geriatric psychiatric hospital tenant, total revenues would have been approximately $30.7 million. When comparing this $30.7 million to our total revenue in the first quarter of 2025, which was $30.1 million, our core portfolio would have achieved 2.2% total revenue growth quarter over quarter. Moving to expenses, property operating expenses decreased by approximately $500,000 quarter over quarter to $5.6 million for the second quarter of 2025.

This reduction was primarily related to the higher seasonal expenses in the first quarter, including snow removal and utilities expense at several properties. Total general and administrative expense was $10.6 million in the second quarter of 2025, but if you exclude the $5.9 million of severance and transition-related payments I mentioned earlier, G&A expense was $4.7 million, a reduction of approximately $400,000 quarter over quarter. This reduction was primarily related to the higher seasonal G&A expenses in the first quarter from our annual employer HSA funding, IR 401(k) contributions, and employer tax payments from stock vestings during the first quarter.

Interest expense increased by $240,000 quarter over quarter to $6.6 million in the second quarter of 2025 because of increased borrowings under our revolving credit facility late in the first quarter to fund the $10 million property acquisition, as well as one extra day of interest in the second quarter compared to the first quarter. Moving to funds from operations, FFO on a diluted common share basis was $0.23 in the second quarter of 2025, but remember that this was reduced by the $0.28 of one-time items I discussed earlier. Adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, which adjusts for straight line rent and stock-based compensation, totaled $13.6 million in the second quarter of 2025, which on a diluted common share basis was $0.50, but also remember that this was reduced by the $0.06 of one-time items I discussed earlier. That concludes our prepared remarks.

Jamie, we are now ready to begin the question and answer session.

Speaker 1

Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we'll begin the question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star and then one using a touch-tone telephone. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. If you are using a speakerphone, we do ask that you please pick up the handset prior to pressing the keys to ensure the best sound quality. Once again, that is star and then one to join the question queue. Our first question today comes from Rob Stevenson from Janney. Please go ahead with your question.

Good morning, guys. Dave, the acquisition that you did, was that out of the $100 million and some dollar pipeline? I think it was seven assets before and now down to six. Is that accounting for that?

Speaker 0

That's correct.

Okay.

That's right.

Are you guys thinking at this point about funding the remaining 25 acquisitions out of that pipeline given where the stock price is now?

Yeah, no, we are very focused on not wanting to continue to just fund those under the revolver, and we are working, I think I've mentioned in prior calls, we're making good progress on our capital recycling efforts. We don't have anything to disclose today, as far as details related to that, but our goal is to use that capital recycling that we've talked about, that is underway, that would pay for the upcoming pipeline that we have, that forward pipeline that we're expecting, late this year and into next year. That's why we're laser-focused on getting those capital recycling projects done. Our goal, and we think based on the activity that we've had so far, we should be able to do that.

Okay. Are you guys still pursuing other options with the geriatric psychiatric hospital facilities just in case that deal falls through, or do you guys think at this point that the likelihood of, you know, nothing's certain, but the likelihood of a deal happening there is strong enough that you've got things to focus on elsewhere at this point?

Look, until the transaction closes, we're going to be very involved. Obviously, we've got significant interest in making sure that this transaction goes through. We think we've got the ingredients to get the transaction closed, which is an interested buyer, an interested seller, and obviously us as a meaningful debt holder. We think that this is the best buyer, and we're excited. They have very similar properties in the portfolio. They have financial resources, they have a good management team, and we're excited about it. We did have other interested buyers in the process, and if for whatever reason during this period of time where they're doing additional diligence work, they would step away or we don't feel like at the end of the day they could bring it to closing, we do have other interested bidders that we would involve in the process.

We're happy with where we sit today, but we're laser-focused on making sure that this gets closed, ideally by year-end.

All right. I guess the other question there would wind up being, it has, you know, given the issue, the financial issues of the existing tenant, is there any deferred maintenance or stuff where you guys are going to need, would need to put in any substantial amount of money to bring them up to a certain level before a new lease would be signed by either the buyer of that company or some other tenant? Are you anticipating at this point that any type of further investment in those assets in the near term would be relatively minor to get leased?

Yeah, no, it's a fair question. We do think that any sort of work on the buildings would be relatively minor. I don't think in general, you know, we make sure that we look at those buildings on a regular basis, and we think the buildings are in good shape. We wouldn't anticipate significant capital required in order to make those buildings ready for the next buyer.

Okay. Last one for me, Bill, if I strip out the $5.9 million of severance and transition-related charges out of G&A, is that a, you know, that for whatever point, whatever number, is that a good run rate, you think, for the final couple of quarters of 2025 for G&A, or is there other stuff that will be impacting that that we should be thinking about as we update our models?

Yeah, as you know, we don't get into guidance, but you're right to be thinking about what were the one-time items that affected this quarter to look at, you know, what would have a more normalized second quarter look like.

Okay. Thanks, guys. Appreciate the time.

Thanks, Rob.

Speaker 1

Our next question comes from Connor Mitchell from Piper Sandler. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I guess first, just going back to the transaction environments and funding possibilities, you guys have used the revolver recently and, you know, focusing on capital recycling instead. I'm just curious, is there kind of a top of the range or a threshold that you're keeping an eye on for either the dollar amount used on the revolver or a leverage metric?

Speaker 0

Yeah, I would say where we are now, obviously is a level that we're comfortable with, but as Dave discussed, as we look at our acquisition pipeline, you know, trying to time that with dispositions and capital recycling is, you know, how we're looking at the remainder of our pipeline. We obviously have availability under revolver and significant availability and cushion to our covenant levels within our revolver. We certainly could take the revolver higher, but our plan is to kind of keep leverage at levels that we're at currently, you know, as we kind of look forward over the next few quarters.

Okay, so it's almost using the capital recycling approach instead of the ATM in the current environment, if I'm understanding correctly.

That's correct.

Okay. And then just turning to the geriatric tenant as well, maybe focusing more on the credit loss and the notes receivable related to the tenant. I just want to make sure if there's any other notes receivable with other tenants that are outstanding, and then also just how you guys, and I think this has been discussed before on calls, but how you're thinking about that process maybe going forward if that remains a possible transaction process with other tenants, either in the portfolio or potential tenants in the future.

I think, and Bill, stop me if I'm wrong, but I think we've got two notes remaining that have an outstanding balance of approximately $4.1 million. We have, after the reserve against these notes, with the geriatric site tenant. Yeah, Connor, I hear you. Look, this business went through a really difficult time during COVID, opening two new hospitals, serving a geriatric population. Their borrowings were significant during that period of time just to get those facilities up and running, and it got to leverage levels that ultimately were not sustainable based on how the business has performed over the last year or so. It's suffice it to say, doing a similar amount of leverage with a tenant is not something that's core to our business, nor is it something we would look to do going forward.

Yes, we are focused on getting assurance resolved and having a strong operator taking over leases in our existing properties, and as we've said before, would not look to lever up with another tenant going forward. We really haven't with our track record. This was an unusual situation and an unusual time during COVID.

Of course. The two notes that are remaining on the balance sheet for $4 million, just an update on those tenants, they're in good standing, and then maybe just the watchlist overall as well if there's any other new tenants that might be popping up or if you're seeing the trend kind of go more positive instead and seeing tenants fall off the watchlist.

Yeah, as far as the notes go, yes, the tenants are paying and performing as expected, and we feel good about those notes and no issues associated with those. Our watchlist has remained pretty consistent. As I've mentioned in prior calls, we have 15 to 20 names that are on that tenant watchlist, and some names will come on while other names come off, based on working through various tenant issues. We've got over 300 tenants, and that's kind of a normal process for us. I'd also mention that there are no other top 10 tenants that are on our watchlist this quarter. I know that's been a question that's come up before. Overall, I think we've got a portfolio that is doing what it's designed to do. It's diversified.

We don't have big concentrations, and I think our tenants overall are performing well, but we'll always manage those watchlist tenants aggressively and make sure that they continue to perform relative to our expectations.

Okay. Appreciate all the color. Thank you.

Thanks, Connor.

Speaker 1

Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star and then one. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. Our next question comes from Michael Lewis from Truist. Please go ahead with your question.

Great, thank you. Is there anything more you could say regarding the strength of this new operator since they're, you know, presumably set to become one of your largest tenants? In this agreement, was the rent level set in the term of the lease and all that, or is that still to be negotiated?

Speaker 0

Michael, how are you? It's good to get your question. We feel very good about the operator. This is an operator with a great deal of experience broadly within the behavioral healthcare space, but also specifically in geriatric psych, which was appealing to the seller and appealing to us. They have a strong, large platform, good financial resources, and a very good team. I think most folks that are in the behavioral space would recognize the name if we told you who the name was. We feel very good about the operator. We think it is a very qualified operator. Your second question, remind me what your second question was.

I was just wondering if the rent level and the terms of the lease were part of this agreement or if that's still to be negotiated.

Those aspects are still in negotiation. Basically, we're negotiating that part with the new tenant, prospective new tenant, and buyer, and they're continuing to do their due diligence with the platform. That is, we're working through that right now.

Okay, got it. As far as the notes, the assurance notes, you talked about that, you took the reserve. Maybe to just put a point on this, what's the chance of, you know, collecting all or part of the interest or the principal load on those notes?

I think part of why we reserve the remaining balance of the notes is we don't believe there's going to be a meaningful pickup. We are very focused on trying to get as much as we possibly can in this transaction. Part of the reason we reserve the remainder of the notes and interest is because we don't think there is a meaningful piece. All of that being said, that can evolve and change, but I think for the purposes of everybody's models, we shouldn't expect a $5 or $10 million recovery here. I think that would, again, work to make sure that that happens, but we're not expecting it.

Okay. Back to this question, you got asked a couple of times about how you'll pay for the pipeline of acquisitions. How much can be bought in 2025, and is there flexibility as far as the timing? You know, something stabilizes and you have kind of a window. I'm also wondering, you know, is there any chance, maybe it's early to answer this, is there any chance you could pass on one or more of these? Is that an option?

These are under purchase and sale agreements, so we would not anticipate looking to pass on these. We view this as very attractive real estate in great markets, and it is our desire to move forward with these acquisitions. Obviously, there are other levers that we can pull. Candidly, we think the best process for us is to have some of the capital recycling that we've talked about pay for this because, as we've discussed in prior calls, we do not want to overlever the balance sheet, and we are committed to doing that. These are very attractive assets. There are a number of things we can do. Our goal is to get these closed, but to get them closed without adding meaningful leverage to our balance sheet.

Okay. How did the disposition cap rates compare with the acquisition yields?

It's still early. We've got to bring these things in to closing, but I would say somewhere between the 7.5 and 8 range is kind of where we're thinking that these things would close and could be even better than that. I think 7.5 to 8 is what we're looking at.

Okay, great. Last one for me, looking at your lease expirations coming up, 5% of the portfolio in the second half of this year, 12% in 2026, what's your expectation for core occupancy? Do you think that goes up or down over the next four to six quarters?

I think we have, and part of the reason we made the change we did is we've got a lot of embedded value in our portfolio. We don't feel like we're doing or have been doing as much as we can in terms of driving occupancy where we think the portfolio can go. Mark has got to get his footing, and he's been with us now a little over two months, but his background and experience and everybody's focus is on really driving the core portfolio's performance, and we think we've got a good head start even before Mark got here. I think we will continue to make progress from that perspective. My thinking is we ought to be, over the next, into 2026, we ought to be able to add 100 basis points or more to our occupancy, but it's going to take us some time to get there.

This isn't something that's going to happen overnight. It's going to take a lot of hard work, but everybody in the company is very focused on making sure that we drive performance in the portfolio, and leasing is obviously going to be a big part of that. It's work to be done, but we feel like we've got the right team to do that work.

All right. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

Thanks, Michael.

Speaker 1

Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we'll be ending today's question and answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to Dave Dupuy for any closing comments.

Speaker 0

Jamie, thank you very much, and thank you, everybody, for joining the call today. I look forward to talking to you later this fall.

Speaker 1

With that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll conclude today's conference call and presentation. We do thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.