Sign in

Mary G. Puma

Director at CIENACIENA
Board

About Mary G. Puma

Independent director (Class II) at Ciena since August 2023; member of the Audit Committee and designated an “audit committee financial expert.” Age 67. Former President & CEO of Axcelis Technologies with deep semiconductor supply chain operating experience; education includes a B.A. in economics (Tufts) and an M.S. from MIT Sloan School of Management .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.Executive Chairperson of the BoardMay 2023 – May 2024Provided semiconductor capital equipment leadership context to board oversight
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.President & Chief Executive OfficerJan 2002 – May 2023Led global operations across sales, marketing, R&D, supply chain, and manufacturing
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.President & COOJul 2000 – Jan 2002Oversight across core operating functions
Eaton (Implant Systems Division, predecessor to Axcelis)General Manager & Vice PresidentFrom 1998Pre-Axcelis leadership in ion implantation systems
General Electric (GE)Marketing & General Management positions~15 years (pre-1996)Broad operating background

External Roles

OrganizationRoleStatusNotes
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.DirectorCurrentPublic company board
Penguin Solutions, Inc. (formerly SMART Global Holdings, Inc.)DirectorCurrentPublic company board
Entegris, Inc.DirectorCurrentPublic company board
SEMI (industry association)Chairperson of the BoardSince Dec 2022Global micro/nano-electronics supply chain association

Board Governance

  • Independence: The Board determined that, except for the CEO and former Executive Chair, all directors during fiscal 2024 were independent; standing committees are composed solely of independent directors .
  • Committee assignments: Audit Committee member; designated by the Board as an “audit committee financial expert” (Item 407(d)(5) Reg S‑K) .
  • Attendance: In fiscal 2024, the Board held 10 meetings; Audit Committee held 8. The company disclosed all directors attended 100% of Board and committee meetings except one director who missed one Board meeting (no names provided) .
  • Executive sessions: Independent directors meet regularly without management present .
  • Overboarding: Ciena’s policy limits directors to three other public company boards (or one if serving as an executive officer of a public company); the company states all directors are in compliance and reviews time commitments annually .
  • Say-on-pay: Approximately 90% of votes cast supported executive compensation at the most recent annual meeting, indicating broad shareholder support for pay practices .

Fixed Compensation (Director)

ComponentStructureAmount/Detail
Annual Board retainer (cash)Non-employee director$75,000
Committee fees (cash)Audit Committee$15,000 member (Chair $35,000)
Meeting feesOnly if >12 meetings$1,500 per extra meeting for Chair; $1,000 for members
Fiscal 2024 cash actually earnedPuma$90,000 (retainers)
Non-employee director comp capTotal cash + equity$500,000 annual limit (2017 Plan)

Notes:

  • Ciena disclosed no changes to director cash compensation for fiscal 2024 .
  • No perquisites for non-employee directors .

Performance Compensation (Director)

ComponentStructureGrant/ValueVesting/Other Terms
Annual Equity (RSUs)Time-basedTarget delivered value $225,000; Puma FY24 grant date fair value $224,962 Annual grant on meeting date; vests on/about one-year anniversary; accelerated upon death, disability, retirement, or change in control
OptionsNot used for directorsNone outstandingCompany reports no outstanding stock options for any directors
DeferralDeferred Compensation PlanDirectors may defer up to 100% of cash and equityDistributions in stock for deferred RSUs; flexible election terms

No performance metrics apply to director equity; awards are time-based RSUs (not PSUs/MSUs) . Clawback policies disclosed pertain to executives; director RSUs are not performance-based and are subject to standard plan terms .

Other Directorships & Interlocks

AreaDetail
Current public boardsAllegro MicroSystems; Penguin Solutions; Entegris
Interlocks with CienaNone disclosed
Overboarding complianceCompany states all directors comply with overboarding policy; Governance & Nominations Committee annually reviews outside board service
Related person transactionsCiena reported no related person transactions in fiscal 2024; Audit Committee oversees related-party reviews

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Former CEO in semiconductor capital equipment; extensive operating oversight in sales, marketing, R&D, supply chain, manufacturing; global transactions and risk management experience; public company director experience .
  • Audit Committee Financial Expert designation underscores financial literacy and oversight depth .
  • Education: B.A. (Tufts), M.S. (MIT Sloan) .

Equity Ownership

HolderShares OwnedRight to AcquireTotal Beneficial% of Outstanding
Mary G. Puma2,696 4,438 (includes RSUs vestable/deferrals per policy note) 7,134 <1%

Additional ownership and alignment details:

  • Outstanding unvested director RSUs at FY-end: 4,438 (aggregate) .
  • Stock ownership guidelines: Non-employee directors must hold 5x annual cash retainer; 50% holding requirement until achieved .
  • Hedging/pledging: Prohibited for employees and directors under Ciena’s Insider Trading Policy .
  • Section 16(a) compliance: Company listed certain late filers for FY24; Mary G. Puma not identified among delinquencies .

Governance Assessment

  • Strengths

    • Independent director with Audit Committee Financial Expert status; enhances financial oversight and risk governance .
    • Semiconductor operations CEO background is highly relevant to Ciena’s supply chain, manufacturing, and technology scaling risks .
    • Compensation structure aligns director interests through majority equity (time-based RSUs), within a $500k director pay cap; no perquisites; meeting fees only above thresholds .
    • Strong governance context: independent committees, executive sessions of independents, robust related-party policy with no related transactions reported for FY24 .
    • Shareholder sentiment supportive (≈90% say-on-pay approval), indicating low governance friction environment .
  • Watchpoints

    • External board load: She serves on three other public boards; while the company asserts compliance with its overboarding policy and annually reviews time commitments, this remains an area to monitor for bandwidth and potential information-flow sensitivities .
    • Ecosystem overlap: Current directorships in the semiconductor supply chain (Allegro, Entegris, Penguin Solutions) may intersect with Ciena’s supplier/customer base; no related-party dealings were disclosed, and the Audit Committee oversees any such matters under a formal policy .
    • Ownership alignment: Beneficial ownership remains below 1% of shares outstanding; the company enforces director ownership guidelines and a 50% post-vesting holding requirement until met, but individual compliance status is not disclosed .
  • Engagement/attendance signal

    • The Board and committees were active in FY24 (Board: 10; Audit: 8), and all directors except one (unnamed) attended 100% of meetings—supportive of engagement and oversight rigor .