CI
CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK)·Q2 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Record quarter: revenue $111.8M (+163% YoY), net income $126.7M, diluted EPS $0.58, and adjusted EBITDA $181.8M, driven by higher bitcoin prices and rapid hashrate expansion to ~16.4 EH/s by quarter-end .
- Quality of earnings: net income included a $119.7M unrealized gain from marking bitcoin to fair value under ASC 350-60, a new accounting policy adopted in FY24 .
- Operating advantages: wholesale power as low as 1.3¢/kWh and all-in power cost of 4.3¢/kWh at wholly owned sites; working capital of $632.7M, cash $323.1M, bitcoin $358.0M, and minimal debt (~$12.8M) .
- Expansion catalysts: definitive agreements to acquire 75 MW in Wyoming (~>4 EH/s; potential +55 MW to ~7.4 EH/s), reaffirmed path to ~32 EH/s by YE24 and ~50 EH/s in 2025; expected hash cost to decline from ~$32 to just under $28 with S21 Pro deployment .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Material scale-up and efficiency: “We recorded $111.8 million in revenue and $181.8 million in adjusted EBITDA… Our efficiency is amongst the best globally,” with current capacity >17 EH/s and eight owned/operated data centers .
- Power cost leadership and margins: “Wholesale power costs as low as 1.3 cents… all-in power cost of 4.3 cents per kilowatt hour,” supporting margin expansion vs Q1 and YoY; owned site energy expense was 26.6% of bitcoin revenue in Q2 .
- Balance sheet strength and HODL strategy: ended Q2 with ~$700M cash+bitcoin, virtually no debt; added >2,000 BTC during Q2 and recognized ~$120M fair value gain, reflecting adoption of fair value accounting for bitcoin .
What Went Wrong
- Earnings composition: $119.7M of Q2 income was unrealized bitcoin fair value gain, diluting operating comparability vs prior periods under earlier impairment accounting .
- Operational delay: Sandersville transformer commissioning delay left 50 MW not yet energized, temporarily constraining hashrate vs plan; management lacks a precise energization timeline .
- Rising OpEx components: Q2 payroll +10% QoQ and G&A +36% QoQ, including ~$0.5M non-recurring miner shipping and ~$1.2M property tax accrual tied to expanded asset base .
Financial Results
Segment mix
Operational KPIs
Balance sheet highlights (Q2 2024)
- Cash $323.1M; Bitcoin $358.0M; Current assets $687.8M; Current liabilities $55.0M; Total debt ~$12.8M; Working capital $632.7M .
Notes: BTC mined and average revenue per BTC from MD&A/statements; Q1 2024 BTC mined not disclosed in the press release or 8-K excerpts provided .
Guidance Changes
CLSK did not issue quantitative revenue/EPS/EBITDA guidance; guidance is operational (MW/EH/s, hash cost) .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We’ve achieved remarkable milestones this past quarter… bolstered our total capacity to over 17 EH/s” .
- CEO: “We… secured our position as the second largest vertically integrated, publicly traded bitcoin mining company in North America” .
- CFO: “Wholesale power costs as low as 1.3 cents per kilowatt hour… very favorable all-in power cost of 4.3 cents” .
- CFO: “We recognized a gain on fair value of almost $120 million… we kept nearly 100% of our bitcoin production for the period” .
- CEO on hash cost trajectory: “Our current hash cost around $32… expected… just under $28 once the S21 Pros… are deployed” .
Q&A Highlights
- Wyoming build schedule and power costs: 45 MW site partly ready; target ~120 days; 75 MW completion before winter; low wholesale power supported by a state blockchain rate .
- M&A environment: Post-halving distress opening opportunities; preference for private tuck-ins; equity or cash; flexibility to integrate operations .
- Supply chain readiness: >50 MW of transformers/switchgear already secured; minimal constraints expected for Wyoming .
- Transformer delay at Sandersville: 50 MW pending commissioning; utilities working earnestly; updates forthcoming .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q2 2024 EPS/revenue was unavailable at time of retrieval; comparison to estimates could not be completed due to data access limits. No estimate-derived values are presented here.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Scale and cost leadership are differentiating: record revenue/EBITDA, industry-low power costs, and expanding hashrate underpin stronger unit economics through the cycle .
- Be mindful of earnings quality: Q2 GAAP net income heavily reflects unrealized bitcoin fair value gains; cash-adjusted operating performance still solid but less dramatic than GAAP optics .
- Capacity growth remains a key catalyst: Wyoming adds near-term EH/s with optional further expansion; reaffirmed 32 EH/s by YE24 and 50 EH/s in 2025 .
- Post-halving opportunity set: management expects consolidation and distressed assets, enabling accretive tuck-ins; balance sheet liquidity supports M&A without heavy leverage .
- Hash cost trajectory improves: S21 Pro deployment targeted to push hash cost just under $28 vs current ~$32; enhances resilience at lower hash price scenarios .
- Watch operational milestones: Sandersville transformer commissioning timeline; energization pace in Wyoming; monthly BTC production/pricing .
- Medium-term thesis: vertically integrated, low-cost miner with diversified footprint and tech stack; value accrues via scale, efficient operations, and strategic HODL in rising BTC price environments .