Alesia Haas
About Alesia Haas
Alesia Haas is Chief Financial Officer at Coinbase (since April 2018), with prior CFO roles at Sculptor Capital (formerly Och-Ziff) and OneWest Bank; she holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and was 48 years old as of March 31, 2025 . Company performance context during her tenure includes 2024 total net revenue of $6.3B, net income of $2.58B, and Adjusted EBITDA of $3.35B; Coinbase’s year-end stock price was $248.30 in 2024 versus $35.39 in 2022, reflecting substantial value creation through 2024’s rebound (non-GAAP defined and reconciled in Appendix A) .
Past Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Strategic Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sculptor Capital Management (formerly Och-Ziff) | Chief Financial Officer | 2016–2018 | Public company CFO experience in alternative asset management |
| OneWest Bank, N.A. (CIT acquisition completed Dec 2015) | Various roles incl. CFO | 2009–2015 (CFO 2013–2015) | Bank CFO experience through sale process to CIT |
External Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANGI Homeservices Inc. | Director | Since 2017 | Public company board service |
| Vimeo, Inc. | Director | Since 2021 | Public company board service |
Fixed Compensation
- Coinbase pays NEOs a competitive base salary and no annual cash bonus; equity is the primary incentive vehicle .
- Alesia Haas’ base salary was $730,000 in 2024 (unchanged vs. 2023) .
| Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 730,000 | — | 3,450 (401k match) | 10,733,380 |
| 2023 | 730,000 | — | 3,300 (401k match) | 733,300 |
| 2022 | 729,125 | — | 3,050 (401k match) | 11,967,321 |
Notes:
- No annual cash bonus for NEOs; program emphasizes long-term equity .
- Benefits are same programs as other U.S. employees; 401(k) match 50% of first 6% compensation (Haas received $3,450 in 2024) .
Performance Compensation
- Coinbase does not operate an annual cash bonus plan for NEOs; Haas’ 2024 equity was a time-vested RSU grant with three-year quarterly vesting, not tied to explicit annual financial targets .
- COO has a separate performance RSU program; no similar PSU program is disclosed for Haas .
| Incentive Type | Metric | Weighting | Target | Actual | Payout | Vesting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Cash Bonus | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Not offered to NEOs |
| RSUs (2024 grant) | Time-based | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Equal quarterly installments Feb 20, 2024 to Nov 20, 2026 |
| PSUs/Options (2024) | N/A for Haas | — | — | — | — | No 2024 PSUs/options granted to Haas |
2024 equity awards to Haas:
- RSUs granted 2/10/2024: 70,427 units; quarterly vest over 3 years starting 2/20/2024; grant-date fair value $9,999,930 .
Equity Ownership & Alignment
- Trading policy: Executives must conduct open-market trades only through Rule 10b5-1 plans; hedging prohibited; pledging prohibited unless approved by CLO .
- Clawback: Compensation recovery policy compliant with SEC/Nasdaq allows recoupment of incentive-based comp upon an accounting restatement .
Ownership (as of March 31, 2025):
- Beneficial ownership: 285,710 Class A shares and 617,668 Class B options deemed beneficially owned; <1% of outstanding shares; includes 9,969 RSUs settling within 60 days and 15,673 Class A shares via ACB 2021, LLC (sole member; disclaims beneficial ownership except pecuniary interest) .
- Director ownership guidelines exist; executive ownership guidelines not disclosed .
Outstanding/Unvested (as of Dec 31, 2024):
| Instrument | Status | Quantity | Exercise/Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSUs (2024 grant) | Unvested | 46,951 | — | Market value $11,657,933 at $248.30; vests quarterly to Nov 20, 2026 |
| Options (2018) | Exercisable | 617,668 | $6.97 | Early-exercise provision; monthly vest schedule completed |
| Options (2020) | Exercisable | 78,433 | $18.13 | Early-exercise provision |
| Options (2022) | Exercisable | 66,769 | $214.50 | Quarterly vest schedule completed in 2024 |
- In-the-money as of 12/31/2024: the above options’ exercise prices ($6.97/$18.13/$214.50) were below the $248.30 stock price .
Insider transactions (2025, under 10b5-1 plan adopted Aug 29, 2024):
- Aug 15, 2025: Open-market sales executed pursuant to 10b5-1 plan (weighted avg sale price range $319.70–$319.94; SEC Form 4) .
- Sep 15, 2025: 6,417 shares sold (blocks at $322.22 and $323.5753); post-transaction holdings disclosed; pursuant to same 10b5-1 plan (SEC Form 4) .
- Oct 15, 2025: 6,142 shares sold (weighted avg $343.36 and $345.42); post-transaction direct 84,820 shares and 3,484 via ACB 2021, LLC; pursuant to 10b5-1 plan (SEC Form 4) .
Takeaway: Haas’ 2024 grant vests quarterly through November 2026, creating periodic supply; reported 2025 sales were plan-driven under a pre-adopted 10b5-1, consistent with policy. No pledging or hedging is permitted by policy, and no pledging is disclosed for Haas .
Employment Terms
- Employment is at-will under an employment letter agreement; NEOs participate in standard company benefits; no annual cash bonus .
- Change-of-control and severance policy (COC Policy):
- Qualifying Termination outside CoC window: 6 months base salary cash lump-sum + up to 6 months company-paid COBRA .
- Qualifying Termination within 3 months before or 12 months after CoC: 12 months base salary + up to 12 months COBRA; 100% acceleration of outstanding equity (performance awards at greater of target or projected actual) .
Severance economics (as of Dec 31, 2024, illustrative per proxy table):
| Scenario | Cash Severance ($) | COBRA ($) | Equity Acceleration ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualifying Termination – No CoC | 365,000 | 14,166 | — | 379,166 |
| Qualifying Termination – With CoC | 730,000 | 28,332 | 11,657,933 (unvested RSUs value at $248.30) | 12,416,265 |
Other governance protections:
- No single-trigger CoC; double-trigger arrangements apply .
- No excise tax gross-ups on parachute payments; cutback to avoid 280G if better after-tax .
Compensation Structure Analysis
- Cash vs. equity mix: No annual bonus; equity RSUs are primary incentive, increasing long-term alignment and retention reliance on stock price/vesting rather than short-term targets .
- Shift in vehicles: 2024 awards for NEOs (ex-CEO) were time-vested RSUs, not options/PSUs, lowering performance risk relative to options but aligning with stock outcomes over time .
- Clawback policy adopted to recoup incentive-based comp upon restatement, improving accountability .
- Pledging/hedging: Prohibited (hedging fully; pledging absent CLO approval), reducing misalignment/credit risk; executive trading restricted to Rule 10b5-1 plans .
Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback
- Say-on-pay frequency: every three years; advisory vote in 2025 proxy .
- Prior result: 2022 say-on-pay received over 99% support, informing continuity of the 2024 program design .
Compensation Peer Group (2024 Cycle)
- Peer set includes high-growth tech/fintech names such as Airbnb, Block, DoorDash, Intuit, Palo Alto Networks, Robinhood, Shopify, Snap, Snowflake, The Trade Desk, Twilio, Workday, Zoom, among others (see proxy for full list/updates) .
Multi-Year Compensation Snapshot (Haas)
| Year | Salary ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | All Other ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 730,000 | 9,999,930 | — | 3,450 | 10,733,380 |
| 2023 | 730,000 | — | — | 3,300 | 733,300 |
| 2022 | 729,125 | 4,935,031 | 6,300,115 | 3,050 | 11,967,321 |
Equity Ownership Detail (as of 12/31/2024 and 3/31/2025)
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Unvested RSUs (12/31/24) | 46,951 units; market value $11,657,933 at $248.30; vesting quarterly to Nov 20, 2026 |
| Options Exercisable (12/31/24) | 617,668 @ $6.97; 78,433 @ $18.13; 66,769 @ $214.50 (all in-the-money vs $248.30) |
| Beneficial Ownership (3/31/25) | 285,710 Class A; 617,668 Class B (via options) beneficially owned; <1% ownership; includes 9,969 RSUs settling within 60 days and 15,673 Class A via ACB 2021, LLC (sole member; disclaims beneficial ownership except pecuniary interest) |
| Trading/Restrictions | Trades via Rule 10b5-1 plans; hedging prohibited; pledging prohibited absent CLO approval |
Insider Selling & Vesting Schedules (Trading Signals)
- 2024 RSUs vest quarterly: first vest 2/20/2024; fully vest by 11/20/2026—implies regular settlement cadence that can add recurring supply absent retention sales holdbacks .
- 2025 insider sales were executed under a 10b5-1 plan adopted Aug 29, 2024:
- Aug 15, 2025 sales; weighted-average prices $319.70–$319.94 (SEC Form 4) .
- Sep 15, 2025: 6,417 shares sold at ~$322–$324 (SEC Form 4) .
- Oct 15, 2025: 6,142 shares sold at ~$343–$345; post-transaction direct 84,820 shares and 3,484 via ACB 2021, LLC (SEC Form 4) .
Governance, Policies, and Related Provisions
- Insider trading/plan policy: directors/executives must use 10b5-1 plans; amendments/terminations subject to cooling-off periods; robust restrictions on hedging/pledging .
- Clawback policy: filed as Exhibit 97.1; enforced by Compensation Committee; applies to current/former officers on incentive-based pay after restatement .
- No single-trigger CoC; double-trigger only; no excise tax gross-ups .
Investment Implications
- Alignment and retention: The absence of annual cash bonuses concentrates incentive value in multi-year equity that vests quarterly, supporting retention but creating predictable vest-driven supply; Haas’ 2024 RSUs vest through 11/20/2026, and her 2025 sales were under a pre-set 10b5-1 plan consistent with policy, mitigating signaling concerns .
- Change-in-control economics: Under a double-trigger CoC event, Haas would receive 12 months’ base salary and full acceleration of equity (target or projected actual for performance awards, though Haas had time-based RSUs in 2024), representing a meaningful equity overhang if a transaction occurs (proxy table shows $11.66M unvested RSUs value at 12/31/24) .
- Risk controls: Formal clawback, trading plan requirements, and bans on hedging/pledging reduce governance red flags; no excise tax gross-ups aligns with shareholder-friendly practices .
- Execution backdrop: Company-level 2024 profitability and stock recovery bolster the perceived effectiveness of the equity-centric model; however, lack of explicit annual performance metrics in CFO pay may reduce direct linkage to financial targets vs. time-based vesting .