CR
CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. (CRL)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 delivered modest beats: revenue $1.005B (+$14M vs S&P Global consensus) and non-GAAP EPS $2.43 (+$0.09 vs consensus), despite −0.5% reported revenue decline YoY; beats reflected RMS strength and stable DSA pricing, offset by softer Manufacturing/CDMO and higher tax rate *.
- Guidance narrowed: 2025 non-GAAP EPS raised to $10.10–$10.30 (from $9.90–$10.30) and organic revenue decline tightened to (2.5)%–(1.5)% (from (3.0)%–(1.0)%); GAAP EPS lowered to $4.15–$4.35 due to higher venture investment losses .
- Strategic levers: board updated strategic review—planning divestitures (~7% of revenue) with ≥$0.30 non-GAAP EPS accretion, incremental $70M cost savings in 2026 (on top of ~$225M), and refreshed $1B buyback authorization .
- Demand signals: DSA book-to-bill 0.82x again, but proposal activity up and cancellations down; management sees early signs of recovery while remaining cautious (Q4 margins to face staffing/NHP sourcing headwinds) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- RMS growth and mix lifted margins: RMS revenue +7.9% YoY to $213.5M; non-GAAP margin expanded to 25.0% on favorable large model mix and restructuring savings .
- DSA stability with improving leading indicators: Spot pricing “stable,” proposals up high single digits, cancellations down; sequential improvement in monthly book-to-bill through the quarter, backlog at $1.80B (vs $1.93B end-June) .
- Cash generation and capital allocation: Q3 free cash flow $178.2M; FY FCF outlook raised to $470–$500M; $1B new repurchase authorization; net leverage ~2.1x, ~70% fixed-rate debt .
-
What Went Wrong
- Manufacturing headwinds: Segment revenue −3.1% YoY on lower CDMO and Biologics Testing, driving non-GAAP margin down to 26.7% (vs 28.7%) .
- Higher non-GAAP tax rate: Q3 non-GAAP tax rate 28.3% (+700 bps YoY) amid OB-3 and global minimum tax provisions, creating a ~$0.24 EPS headwind .
- DSA book-to-bill sub-1.0x: Third straight quarter at 0.82x, with net bookings $494M and backlog down sequentially; Q4 margins to face higher staffing and third‑party NHP sourcing costs .
Financial Results
Headline metrics vs prior periods and estimates
Actuals vs S&P Global consensus (quarterly)
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment revenue and margins (Q3 YoY)
Key KPIs
Notes: “—” not disclosed in cited quarter.
Non-GAAP adjustments and impacts (Q3)
- GAAP EPS dragged by venture/strategic investment losses of ~$0.33/share vs +$0.03 last year; non-GAAP excludes these items .
- Q4 margin/earnings to be pressured by higher staffing and third‑party NHP sourcing costs (timing effects) .
Guidance Changes
Q4 embedded commentary: revenue flat to low single-digit decline YoY; non-GAAP EPS flat to −10% sequential vs Q3 ($2.43) .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategy and backdrop: “Positive signals are beginning to emerge… industry may be on a path towards recovery; however, sustained improvement… will take time… remaining cautious” — Jim Foster .
- Strategic actions: “Divesting underperforming or non-core businesses (~7% of 2025 revenue)… expected to result in ≥$0.30 non-GAAP EPS accretion… implement initiatives… incremental net cost savings of ~$70M annually fully realized in 2026” — Jim Foster .
- Capital allocation: “Board… approved a new $1 billion stock repurchase authorization… evaluate the prudent level of stock repurchases… considering valuation, growth prospects, leverage” — Jim Foster .
- Outlook parameters: “For the fourth quarter… non-GAAP EPS expected to be flat to 10% below Q3’s $2.43… DSA margin pressure from staffing/NHP sourcing; RMS margin moderation due to NHP timing/seasonality” — Mike Knell .
- Demand indicators: “DSA proposal activity improved… biotech proposals up high single-digit… spot pricing remained stable overall” — Jim Foster .
Q&A Highlights
- DSA trajectory into 2026: Management “guardedly optimistic” if funding/proposals improvement persists; need continued trend through 4Q/1Q and client budgets to finalize before framing 2026 growth .
- NAMs adoption: Clients see NAMs as complementary; alternatives still nascent; CRL investing in in vitro and regulatory strategy (SAB led by former FDA principal deputy) .
- Divestitures: ~7% of revenue targeted; ≥$0.30 EPS accretion; no asset specifics provided; aim to complete by mid-2026; continuing ops accounting expected .
- Pricing/win rates: Spot pricing stable; selective discounts to protect/gain share; expect pricing leverage as capacity tightens .
- Capacity/staffing: Supplementary hiring in Lab Sciences within SA to meet better-than-expected demand; utilization below “optimal low-80s,” providing start capacity; new space takes 18–24 months .
- NHP costs: Higher third‑party sourcing due to exceeding earlier demand expectations; not expected to be ongoing headwind if planning aligns with demand in 2026 .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 beat S&P Global consensus: Revenue $1,004.9M vs $990.8M*; non-GAAP EPS $2.43 vs $2.340* .
- Consistent YTD beats: Q1 revenue $984.2M vs $941.9M*; EPS $2.34 vs $2.075*; Q2 revenue $1,032.1M vs $989.6M*; EPS $3.12 vs $2.548* .
- Estimate dispersion: 14 EPS estimates and 11 revenue estimates in Q3, indicating reasonable coverage breadth*.
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Beat-and-raise (non-GAAP) with improving demand signals: modest Q3 beat and higher FY non-GAAP EPS midpoint reflect RMS strength, disciplined cost control, and early DSA stabilization .
- Watch Q4 margin headwinds: Staffing and NHP sourcing timing to weigh on DSA/RMS margins short term; management embedded flat to down 10% sequential EPS in FY outlook .
- 2026 earnings setup: ≥$70M incremental cost savings (on ~$225M base) plus portfolio pruning (≥$0.30 EPS accretion) could amplify operating leverage if DSA bookings improve and Manufacturing stabilizes .
- DSA recovery catalysts: Biotech funding rebound, higher proposals, declining cancellations, and stable pricing are critical leading indicators; monitor book-to-bill crossing >1.0x and backlog trajectory .
- Segment mix: Microbial Solutions remains a bright spot; CDMO/ Biologics Testing softness persists; RMS benefits from NHP timing—expect normalization in 4Q .
- Capital returns and balance sheet: $1B buyback authorization with rising FCF ($470–$500M FY) and ~2.1x leverage provide optionality for repurchases and bolt-ons .
- Regulatory clarity: Closure of NHP investigations reduces a key overhang; near-term third‑party sourcing costs are transitory; NAMs capability build positions CRL for the long term .
Citations:
- Q3 2025 press release and schedules:
- 8-K 2.02 and exhibits:
- Q3 2025 earnings call transcript:
- Strategic review press release:
- Q2 2025 press release and schedules:
- Q1 2025 press release and schedules:
S&P Global consensus values indicated with * and are sourced from S&P Global.