Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

CR

CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. (CRL)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 delivered modest beats: revenue $1.005B (+$14M vs S&P Global consensus) and non-GAAP EPS $2.43 (+$0.09 vs consensus), despite −0.5% reported revenue decline YoY; beats reflected RMS strength and stable DSA pricing, offset by softer Manufacturing/CDMO and higher tax rate *.
  • Guidance narrowed: 2025 non-GAAP EPS raised to $10.10–$10.30 (from $9.90–$10.30) and organic revenue decline tightened to (2.5)%–(1.5)% (from (3.0)%–(1.0)%); GAAP EPS lowered to $4.15–$4.35 due to higher venture investment losses .
  • Strategic levers: board updated strategic review—planning divestitures (~7% of revenue) with ≥$0.30 non-GAAP EPS accretion, incremental $70M cost savings in 2026 (on top of ~$225M), and refreshed $1B buyback authorization .
  • Demand signals: DSA book-to-bill 0.82x again, but proposal activity up and cancellations down; management sees early signs of recovery while remaining cautious (Q4 margins to face staffing/NHP sourcing headwinds) .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • RMS growth and mix lifted margins: RMS revenue +7.9% YoY to $213.5M; non-GAAP margin expanded to 25.0% on favorable large model mix and restructuring savings .
    • DSA stability with improving leading indicators: Spot pricing “stable,” proposals up high single digits, cancellations down; sequential improvement in monthly book-to-bill through the quarter, backlog at $1.80B (vs $1.93B end-June) .
    • Cash generation and capital allocation: Q3 free cash flow $178.2M; FY FCF outlook raised to $470–$500M; $1B new repurchase authorization; net leverage ~2.1x, ~70% fixed-rate debt .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Manufacturing headwinds: Segment revenue −3.1% YoY on lower CDMO and Biologics Testing, driving non-GAAP margin down to 26.7% (vs 28.7%) .
    • Higher non-GAAP tax rate: Q3 non-GAAP tax rate 28.3% (+700 bps YoY) amid OB-3 and global minimum tax provisions, creating a ~$0.24 EPS headwind .
    • DSA book-to-bill sub-1.0x: Third straight quarter at 0.82x, with net bookings $494M and backlog down sequentially; Q4 margins to face higher staffing and third‑party NHP sourcing costs .

Financial Results

Headline metrics vs prior periods and estimates

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($B)1.010 0.984 1.032 1.005
GAAP Diluted EPS ($)1.33 0.50 1.06 1.10
Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($)2.59 2.34 3.12 2.43
GAAP Operating Margin (%)11.6 7.6 9.7 13.3
Non-GAAP Operating Margin (%)19.9 19.1 22.1 19.7

Actuals vs S&P Global consensus (quarterly)

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue actual ($M)984.2 1,032.1 1,004.9
Revenue consensus mean ($M)941.9*989.6*990.8*
Revenue surprise ($M)+42.3+42.5+14.1
Non-GAAP EPS actual ($)2.34 3.12 2.43
EPS consensus mean ($)2.075*2.548*2.340*
EPS surprise ($)+0.27+0.57+0.09

Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.

Segment revenue and margins (Q3 YoY)

SegmentQ3 2024 Revenue ($M)Q3 2025 Revenue ($M)YoY ReportedNon-GAAP Op Margin Q3 2024Non-GAAP Op Margin Q3 2025
RMS197.8 213.5 +7.9% 21.0% 25.0%
DSA615.1 600.7 −2.3% 27.4% 25.4%
Manufacturing196.9 190.7 −3.1% 28.7% 26.7%
Total1,009.8 1,004.9 −0.5% 19.9% 19.7%

Key KPIs

KPIQ2 2025Q3 2025
DSA net book-to-bill0.82x 0.82x
DSA backlog ($B)1.93 (end-June) 1.80 (end-Q3)
Net bookings (DSA, $M)494
Free cash flow ($M)178.2
CapEx ($M)35.6
Non-GAAP tax rate28.3%
Debt outstanding$2.3B (end-Q2) $2.2B (~70% fixed)
Net leverage2.2x (Q2) ~2.1x (Q3)

Notes: “—” not disclosed in cited quarter.

Non-GAAP adjustments and impacts (Q3)

  • GAAP EPS dragged by venture/strategic investment losses of ~$0.33/share vs +$0.03 last year; non-GAAP excludes these items .
  • Q4 margin/earnings to be pressured by higher staffing and third‑party NHP sourcing costs (timing effects) .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious Guidance (Aug 6)Current Guidance (Nov 5)Change
Revenue growth (reported)FY 2025(2.5)% – (0.5)% (1.5)% – (0.5)% Raised (narrowed higher)
FX impactFY 2025~ (0.5)% ~ (1.0)% Higher headwind
Organic revenue growthFY 2025(3.0)% – (1.0)% (2.5)% – (1.5)% Tightened mid-range
GAAP EPSFY 2025$4.25–$4.65 $4.15–$4.35 Lowered (VC losses)
Non-GAAP EPSFY 2025$9.90–$10.30 $10.10–$10.30 Raised midpoint
VC/strategic investment lossesFY 2025~ $0.17 $0.50 Higher losses
Restructuring costsFY 2025~ $1.40 ~ $1.30 Lower
Acq.-related amort./costsFY 2025~ $3.60 ~ $3.65 Slightly higher
Segment outlook (organic)FY 2025DSA: mid‑single digit decline; RMS: flat–low growth; Manufacturing: ~flat DSA: (2.5)%–(3.5)%; RMS: flat–slightly positive; Manufacturing: flat to slightly negative DSA better than start-of-year; Manufacturing tempered

Q4 embedded commentary: revenue flat to low single-digit decline YoY; non-GAAP EPS flat to −10% sequential vs Q3 ($2.43) .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicQ1 2025 (prior)Q2 2025 (prior)Q3 2025 (current)Trend
Demand/BookingsDSA bookings highest in 2 years; raised DSA outlook to mid-single-digit decline; mix tailwind in H1 DSA organic −2.4%; DOJ/DOI cleared NHP shipments; mix/margins aided; guidance raised Book-to-bill 0.82x again; proposals up; cancellations down; backlog $1.80B; cautious near-term Stabilizing, early recovery signals
PricingSpot pricing stable; selective discounting used strategically Stabilized
NHP Supply/RegulatoryDOJ/DOI closed NHP investigations; cleared shipments Higher 4Q third‑party NHP sourcing costs; cases closed drive prior inventory charge reductions Operational normalization; near-term cost
Manufacturing/CDMOMicrobial strong; Biologics Testing soft; CDMO commercial client wind-down Manufacturing −3.1% YoY; Microbial strong; Biologics Testing soft; another commercial client remains Mixed
Strategic Review/PortfolioDivest ~7% rev; ≥$0.30 EPS accretion; $70M incremental savings; $1B buyback Proactive optimization
Macro/PolicyMore certainty around tariffs/drug pricing; biotech funding improving Supportive backdrop forming
NAMs/TechnologySAB led by ex-FDA principal deputy; expanding in vitro/NAMs; Endosafe Trillium traction Building capabilities

Management Commentary

  • Strategy and backdrop: “Positive signals are beginning to emerge… industry may be on a path towards recovery; however, sustained improvement… will take time… remaining cautious” — Jim Foster .
  • Strategic actions: “Divesting underperforming or non-core businesses (~7% of 2025 revenue)… expected to result in ≥$0.30 non-GAAP EPS accretion… implement initiatives… incremental net cost savings of ~$70M annually fully realized in 2026” — Jim Foster .
  • Capital allocation: “Board… approved a new $1 billion stock repurchase authorization… evaluate the prudent level of stock repurchases… considering valuation, growth prospects, leverage” — Jim Foster .
  • Outlook parameters: “For the fourth quarter… non-GAAP EPS expected to be flat to 10% below Q3’s $2.43… DSA margin pressure from staffing/NHP sourcing; RMS margin moderation due to NHP timing/seasonality” — Mike Knell .
  • Demand indicators: “DSA proposal activity improved… biotech proposals up high single-digit… spot pricing remained stable overall” — Jim Foster .

Q&A Highlights

  • DSA trajectory into 2026: Management “guardedly optimistic” if funding/proposals improvement persists; need continued trend through 4Q/1Q and client budgets to finalize before framing 2026 growth .
  • NAMs adoption: Clients see NAMs as complementary; alternatives still nascent; CRL investing in in vitro and regulatory strategy (SAB led by former FDA principal deputy) .
  • Divestitures: ~7% of revenue targeted; ≥$0.30 EPS accretion; no asset specifics provided; aim to complete by mid-2026; continuing ops accounting expected .
  • Pricing/win rates: Spot pricing stable; selective discounts to protect/gain share; expect pricing leverage as capacity tightens .
  • Capacity/staffing: Supplementary hiring in Lab Sciences within SA to meet better-than-expected demand; utilization below “optimal low-80s,” providing start capacity; new space takes 18–24 months .
  • NHP costs: Higher third‑party sourcing due to exceeding earlier demand expectations; not expected to be ongoing headwind if planning aligns with demand in 2026 .

Estimates Context

  • Q3 2025 beat S&P Global consensus: Revenue $1,004.9M vs $990.8M*; non-GAAP EPS $2.43 vs $2.340* .
  • Consistent YTD beats: Q1 revenue $984.2M vs $941.9M*; EPS $2.34 vs $2.075*; Q2 revenue $1,032.1M vs $989.6M*; EPS $3.12 vs $2.548* .
  • Estimate dispersion: 14 EPS estimates and 11 revenue estimates in Q3, indicating reasonable coverage breadth*.
    Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Beat-and-raise (non-GAAP) with improving demand signals: modest Q3 beat and higher FY non-GAAP EPS midpoint reflect RMS strength, disciplined cost control, and early DSA stabilization .
  • Watch Q4 margin headwinds: Staffing and NHP sourcing timing to weigh on DSA/RMS margins short term; management embedded flat to down 10% sequential EPS in FY outlook .
  • 2026 earnings setup: ≥$70M incremental cost savings (on ~$225M base) plus portfolio pruning (≥$0.30 EPS accretion) could amplify operating leverage if DSA bookings improve and Manufacturing stabilizes .
  • DSA recovery catalysts: Biotech funding rebound, higher proposals, declining cancellations, and stable pricing are critical leading indicators; monitor book-to-bill crossing >1.0x and backlog trajectory .
  • Segment mix: Microbial Solutions remains a bright spot; CDMO/ Biologics Testing softness persists; RMS benefits from NHP timing—expect normalization in 4Q .
  • Capital returns and balance sheet: $1B buyback authorization with rising FCF ($470–$500M FY) and ~2.1x leverage provide optionality for repurchases and bolt-ons .
  • Regulatory clarity: Closure of NHP investigations reduces a key overhang; near-term third‑party sourcing costs are transitory; NAMs capability build positions CRL for the long term .

Citations:

  • Q3 2025 press release and schedules:
  • 8-K 2.02 and exhibits:
  • Q3 2025 earnings call transcript:
  • Strategic review press release:
  • Q2 2025 press release and schedules:
  • Q1 2025 press release and schedules:

S&P Global consensus values indicated with * and are sourced from S&P Global.