Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Neeraj Agrawal

Director at SprinklrSprinklr
Board

About Neeraj Agrawal

Neeraj Agrawal, age 52, has served on Sprinklr’s board since August 2011. He is a General Partner at Battery Ventures (since August 2000), and currently serves on boards of several technology companies; he holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Cornell and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School . Sprinklr’s board has affirmatively determined he is an independent director under NYSE standards (and independent for audit committee service) .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Battery VenturesGeneral PartnerAug 2000 – Present

External Roles

OrganizationRoleStatusNotes
Braze, Inc.DirectorCurrentPublic company board
Dataiku, Inc.DirectorCurrentPrivate company
Pendo, Inc.DirectorCurrentPrivate company
Tealium, Inc.DirectorCurrentPrivate company
Workato, Inc.DirectorCurrentPrivate company
Amplitude, Inc.DirectorFormerPublic; previously served
Bazaarvoice, Inc.DirectorFormerPreviously served
Coupa Software IncorporatedDirectorFormerPreviously served
Marketo, Inc.DirectorFormerPreviously served
Wayfair, Inc.DirectorFormerPublic; previously served

Board Governance

  • Independence: Board determined Agrawal is independent; also independent for audit committee service .
  • Committee assignments:
    • Audit Committee member (committee since Jan 29, 2025: Hauser (Chair), Agrawal, Gillis, Wasim) .
    • Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee member (committee consists of Kanouff, Schloss (Chair), and Agrawal) .
    • Not a member of the Compensation Committee (committee consists of Schloss, Haverty, Ward, Wasim (Chair)) .
CommitteeMember?Chair?Source
AuditYes No
CompensationNo No
Nominating & Corporate GovernanceYes No
  • Attendance & engagement: In FY ended Jan 31, 2025, the Board met 9x; Audit 8x; Compensation 8x; Nominating & Corporate Governance 5x. Each director attended at least 75% of Board and committee meetings on which they served .
  • Board leadership: Separate Chair (Ragy Thomas) and CEO (Rory Read) roles; Lead Independent Director is Eileen Schloss, who moderates executive sessions held at least twice per year .

Fixed Compensation (Non-Employee Director)

ComponentAmountNotes
Annual cash retainer$40,000Policy amount
Audit Committee member retainer$10,000Non-chair member
Nominating & Corporate Governance member retainer$5,000Non-chair member
Cash actually paid (FY2025)$55,000Reported for Agrawal

Performance Compensation (Director Equity)

Equity ComponentGrant-Date ValueVestingPerformance Metrics
Annual RSU grant (FY2025)$199,995Vests in full on earlier of 1-year anniversary or day prior to next Annual Meeting, subject to service None disclosed; time-based RSUs (no performance metrics)
  • Policy also allows directors to elect to receive cash retainers in RSUs vesting quarterly (retainer grant); amounts remain time-based; no performance metrics .

Other Directorships & Interlocks

  • Significant shareholder affiliation: Entities associated with Battery Ventures beneficially own ~6.1% of Class A and ~5.8% of Class B; Agrawal is a managing member of Battery entities and may be deemed to share voting/dispositive power (disclaims beneficial ownership except to extent of pecuniary interest) . The Board nonetheless determined Agrawal is independent, considering relevant relationships .
  • H&F board rights: Separate from Agrawal, Hellman & Friedman has a letter agreement granting a board seat (currently Tarim Wasim) and committee representation rights .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Board-disclosed skills for Agrawal: Executive leadership; other public company board experience; software/technology industry; growth and scale; financial; international business; mergers & acquisitions .

Equity Ownership

Holding (as of Apr 15, 2025)Amount% OwnershipNotes
Class A common stock9,743,7336.9%Beneficial ownership table
Class B common stock6,710,3045.8%Beneficial ownership table (10 votes/share)
% of total voting power5.9%Beneficial ownership table
RSUs outstanding (director)22,522RSUs held by Agrawal
Options outstanding (director)None listed for Agrawal
  • Stock ownership guidelines: Non-employee directors must hold stock equal to 3x annual cash retainer; all directors met or were within the compliance period as of Jan 31, 2025 .
  • Hedging/pledging: Prohibited for directors under Sprinklr’s Insider Trading Policy .

Governance Assessment

  • Strengths:

    • Independent status affirmed despite investor affiliation; serves on Audit and Nominating & Corporate Governance—committees key to oversight and director selection .
    • Solid engagement: Board and committees met frequently in FY2025; every director achieved ≥75% attendance .
    • Equity alignment: Annual $200k time-based RSU for directors and 3x retainer ownership guideline support owner mindset; hedging/pledging prohibited .
    • Audit oversight: As Audit member, Agrawal helps oversee financial reporting, internal controls, cybersecurity, and related-party review; the committee issued a clean report recommending inclusion of audited financials .
  • Potential risks/considerations:

    • Investor interlock: Agrawal’s role at Battery (a >5% beneficial owner) could pose perceived conflicts, though the board conducted independence review and affirmed independence; no Battery-related party transactions were disclosed .
    • Voting concentration: Dual-class structure concentrates voting power with H&F (44.6%) and the Founder (43.5%), which can limit minority shareholder influence, underscoring the importance of independent directors’ oversight .
    • Related-party transactions in FY2025 were limited (Lyearn services tied to the Founder), reviewed/approved by the Audit Committee; none involved Agrawal .
  • Shareholder sentiment context: FY2024 Say-on-Pay support was 99.5%, signaling strong investor endorsement of compensation governance during the prior year .

Overall, Agrawal brings deep software investing and public board experience, serves on governance-critical committees with solid attendance, holds meaningful equity exposure, and was affirmed independent despite a significant shareholder affiliation—factors that generally support board effectiveness while warranting ongoing monitoring for investor interlock optics .