Dime Community Bancshares - Earnings Call - Q2 2025

Executive Summary

• EPS of $0.64, up from $0.45 in Q1 and $0.43 in Q2 last year; modest beat vs S&P Global consensus EPS of $0.624 as reported by SPGI estimates*.
• Adjusted total revenues reached $109.5M vs $103.8M in Q1 and $84.0M in Q2 last year, while SPGI “Revenue” came in at $100.5M vs $106.5M consensus (a miss)*.
• Net interest margin rose to 2.98% (from 2.95% in Q1); management guided a “gradual upward bias” for Q3 and more pronounced expansion in Q4 as ~$600M reprices in 2H25 and ~$1.95B reprices through 2026.
• Capital and funding improved: CET1 at 11.25%, core deposits up $1.21B YoY, brokered deposits cut to $200M; catalysts include new lending verticals and Lakewood/Manhattan branch expansion.

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

• Core deposit and business loan growth: core deposits +$1.21B YoY; business loans +$113.3M QoQ and +$371.3M YoY, supporting NIM expansion.
• Efficiency improved: efficiency ratio fell to 55.0% (adjusted 54.7%) vs 63.1% in Q1 and 63.8% in Q2 last year; CEO: “we have made significant progress in creating a core deposit-funded balance sheet”.
• Strategic hiring and diversification: new corporate/specialty finance, lender finance, fund finance leaders strengthen growth pipeline; Kroll outlook revised to “Positive”.

What Went Wrong

• Asset quality mixed: NPLs rose to $53.2M vs $24.8M last year; credit loss provision elevated at $9.2M (vs $5.6M in Q2’24).
• Deposit costs broadly flat absent rate cuts; CFO expects only small CD cost tailwinds absent Fed easing (limits near-term NIM gains on funding side).
• SPGI revenue miss vs consensus despite strong company-reported adjusted revenues, highlighting definitional differences and the need to reconcile investor data sources*.

Transcript

Operator (participant)

Hey, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Dime Community Bancshares Inc. Q2 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press *11 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press *11 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. Before we begin, the company would like to remind you that discussions during this call contain forward-looking statements made under the Safe Harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any such statements, including as set forth in today's press release and the company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, to which we refer you. During this call, references will be made to non-GAAP financial measures as supplemental measures to review and assess operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For information about these non-GAAP measures and for reconciliation to GAAP, please refer to today's earnings release. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Stuart Lubow, President and CEO. Please go ahead.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Good morning. Thank you, Stephen, and thank you all for joining us this morning for our quarterly earnings call. With me this morning is Avi Reddy, our CFO. In my prepared remarks, I will touch upon key highlights for the second quarter of 2025. Avi will then provide some details on the quarter and thoughts on the remainder of the year. Our core earnings power has increased significantly over the past year. Core pre-tax pre-provision income was $49 million in the second quarter of 2025, compared to $28 million a year ago. This translated into a core ROA of 85 basis points for the second quarter. Core deposits were up $1.2 billion on a year-over-year basis. The deposit teams hired since 2023 have grown their deposit portfolios to approximately $2.2 billion. This has allowed us to continue to pay down our brokered deposits to a fairly minimal level.

We have made significant progress in creating a core deposit-funded balance sheet with ample liquidity to take advantage of lending opportunities as they arise. Our cost of total deposits was 2.09% in the second quarter. By maintaining a strong focus on cost of funds management, our NIM has now increased for the fifth consecutive quarter and is approaching the 3% mark. We continue to have several catalysts to continue to grow our NIM over the medium to long term, including a significant backbook repricing opportunity. Avi will get into that in more detail in his remarks. On the loan front, we continue to execute on our stated plan of growing business loans and managing our CRE ratio lower. Business loans grew over $110 million in the second quarter and over $370 million, or 15% on a year-over-year basis.

We are starting to see the benefit of the new hires we've made over the past couple of years. Loan origination, including new lines of credit, increased to $450 million for the quarter. The weighted average rate on new origination was approximately 7%. Our loan pipeline continues to be strong and currently stands at $1.2 billion, compared to approximately $1.1 billion at quarter end in March and $750 million when we reported earnings in January. The weighted average rate on the pipeline is approximately 6.85%. On our recruiting efforts, disruption in the local market remains very high, and in the second quarter, we executed on a commercial lending diversification strategy. After hiring Tom Geisel in the first quarter, we identified several verticals that are complementary to our existing businesses and made a number of senior hires.

Once they settle in, we expect these verticals to contribute to our growth in the fourth quarter and beyond. While hiring does cause an increase in near-term operating expenses, we expect all these verticals to meaningfully contribute to the execution of our strategic goals. In addition to the new lending verticals, we made progress on getting regulatory approvals to open a new location in Lakewood, New Jersey. Additionally, we expect to open a new branch in Manhattan in the fourth quarter. In conclusion, the momentum in our business is extremely strong, and we continue to execute on our business plan of growing business loans and core deposits. We have clearly differentiated our franchise from our local competitors as it relates to our growth trajectory and the ability to attract talented bankers. We have an outstanding deposit franchise, a strong liquidity position, and a robust capital base.

It is important to note that our full earnings power, which is underpinned by a 30% non-interest-bearing deposit base, is not yet shining through, as the asset side of the balance sheet has not yet repriced. Ongoing NIM improvement is supported by loan repricing opportunities and coupled with organic growth across deposits and business loans. That will aid in unlocking the inherent earnings of Dime. I'm looking forward to the remainder of 2025 and want to again thank all our dedicated employees for their efforts in positioning Dime as the best business bank in New York. With that, I will turn the call over to Avi.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Thank you, Stu. Core EPS was $0.64 per share. This represents increases of 12% on a linked quarter basis and 49% on a year-over-year basis. The reported NIM increased to 2.98%. We had around 3 basis points of prepayment fees in the second quarter NIM. Excluding prepayment fees and purchase accounting, the second quarter NIM would have been 2.95%. As a reminder, the first quarter NIM, excluding prepayment fees and purchase accounting, was 2.91%. Non-brokered deposits were up approximately $210 million at June 30th versus the prior quarter. As we continue to see strong inflows across our branch network and across the private and commercial bank, we proactively reduced a higher-cost municipal relationship by approximately $125 million in the second quarter. Said differently, had we not proactively reduced this municipal relationship, we would have grown non-brokered deposits by approximately $335 million in the second quarter.

Core cash operating expenses, excluding intangible amortization and severance expense, were $59.9 million. The linked quarter increase in expenses was primarily due to the hiring of production staff. Non-interest income of $11.6 million reflected increased loan swap income. We had a $9.2 million credit loss provision for the quarter, and the allowance to loans increased to 86 basis points. Capital levels continue to grow, and our common equity tier 1 ratio increased to 11.25%, and our total capital ratio grew to 15.8%. Having best-in-class capital ratios versus our local peer group is a competitive advantage and will allow us to take advantage of opportunities as they arise and speaks to our strength and ability to service our growing customer base. Next, I'll provide some thoughts on guidance for the remainder of 2025. As I mentioned previously, excluding prepayment fees, the NIM for the second quarter would have been 2.95%.

We would use this as a starting point for modeling purposes going forward, as we don't expect the prepayment fees to repeat in that size in the upcoming quarters. In the near term, we expect a gradual upward bias in the NIM for the third quarter, with more pronounced expansion in the fourth quarter, as the asset repricing story will start to unfold with more vigor towards the end of the year. To give you a sense of the significant backbook repricing opportunity in our adjustable and fixed-rate loan portfolios, in the second half of 2025 and the full year 2026, we have approximately $1.95 billion of adjustable and fixed-rate loans across the loan portfolio at a weighted average rate of approximately 4.1% that either reprice or mature in that timeframe.

Assuming a 225 basis point spread on those loans over the forward five-year Treasury, we could see a 30 basis points increase in NIM from the repricing of these loans. As we look into the backbook for 2027, we have another $1.7 billion of loans at a weighted average rate of 4.25% that will lead to continued NIM expansion in 2027. Moving to the short end of the curve, should the Federal Reserve cut rates, we expect our previous trend of approximately 5 basis points of NIM expansion for every 25 basis point rate cut to repeat, assuming the behavior and deposits in loans hold for each subsequent rate cut and competition remains rational. In summary, assuming the market consensus forward curve plays out, we have a path to a structurally higher NIM and enhanced earnings power over time.

As we approach a 3% margin, the next marker in front of us is 3.25%, and after that, 3.50%. It's important to note that while the destination to us is clear, the near to medium term NIM is going to be a function of business loan growth. We believe we have the people and verticals in place to drive strong medium to long term business loan growth. Along the journey, if there's a quarter of subdued growth and less remixing, it does not change the ending NIM destination in our mind. With respect to balance sheet growth, we expect low single-digit growth for the remainder of the year, with the planned attrition in transactional CRE and multifamily masked by growth in our business loan portfolio. As we've typically done, we will only provide guidance for 2026 once we get into the new year. Next, I'll turn to expenses.

As outlined in the press release, we have organically built out several new lending verticals. As a result, we are updating our core cash non-interest expense guidance, which excludes intangible amortization, to approximately $61.5 million for the third quarter of 2025. This updated guidance is based on our existing employee base at the time of the earnings release. For the third quarter, we anticipate swap fee income to be approximately $0.5 million and total non-interest income to be in the $10.5 million area. Finally, on the tax rate, we expect the effective tax rate to be between 27% and 27.5% for the third quarter. With that, I'll turn the call back to the operator, and we'll be happy to take your questions.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. At this time, we will conduct the question and answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press *11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press *11 again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of Thomas Reid of Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Thomas Reid (Analyst)

Hey, guys.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Hey, Thomas. How are you?

Thomas Reid (Analyst)

Thanks for taking my question. I want to start it off. Saw a pretty, pretty healthy bump in DDA balances here based relative to the prior trend. Was there anything one-time in nature, or can we expect a similar trajectory there going forward?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, nothing one-time, Thomas.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Yeah, no, we've had a nice continued strength in our retail network as well as our private banking groups. If you look at a quarter over quarter, we're still seeing a significant amount of new accounts open. There are about 1,500 new accounts opened in our private banking group quarter over quarter. Obviously, you know, $350 million to $400 million in growth quarter over quarter. We're still seeing significant positive trends in both the retail group as well as our private banking group.

Thomas Reid (Analyst)

Okay, good. That's good to hear. It looks like the weighted average rate on the loan pipeline is down about 40 basis points. Is that largely driven by rate movements, or are you maybe seeing a little bit more competition, tightening of spreads there?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

No, the origination rate this quarter was around 7.10%, and as Stu mentioned in his prepared remarks, the new pipeline was around 6.85%. It's probably around 20 to 25 basis points. Some of it is just we're doing floating rate loans. We're getting a good spread over it. It's a little bit of makeshift, things like that. Nothing substantial in there, but we're still pretty much there, very high sixes to close to seven, basically.

Thomas Reid (Analyst)

Okay, that's good. I'll step back in the queue. Thank you for taking my question.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Thank you.

Thomas Reid (Analyst)

Thanks, Thomas.

Operator (participant)

Our next question comes from the line of Mark Fitzgibbon of Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

Mark Fitzgibbon (Head of FSG Research)

Hey, guys. Good morning. First question, Avi, just to clarify, you did say $61.5 million for operating expenses for the third quarter. Is that correct?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Excluding the intangible amortization mark, $61.5 million plus the $200,000, $250,000 odd for the intangible amortization, all in, it's probably $61.8 million.

Mark Fitzgibbon (Head of FSG Research)

Okay, great. Secondly, I wonder if you could remind us what the impact of a 25 basis point rate cut means to NII or the margin. Any color on that?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

It's historically been around five basis points, so we'd expect that to continue. Obviously, if we get a bunch of gradual 25 basis point rate cuts with some time lag in between them, that's the most favorable environment for us to realize the full five basis points. I would use around five basis points.

Mark Fitzgibbon (Head of FSG Research)

Okay, great. At a high level, I guess I'm curious how you all are thinking about the hiring. You've done a lot of hiring, had some really good success in the deposit front and grown business. Are we getting to the point, do you think, where expense growth and hiring start to flatten out a little bit here, or is there still a steep trajectory there?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, I'd say, Mark, we put the verticals in place on the lending side. The second quarter was a big hiring quarter for us in terms of who we put in place and the infrastructure behind it. As we get closer to the end of the year, it's harder to move people, basically. There could be some singles and doubles where we add some people on, but I think any substantial hiring, as you get into August and September, you then start getting into next year at that point. I think using the Q3 run rate-ish plus or minus for the fourth quarter is not unreasonable, maybe up a little bit. Once we get into next year, we're going to have to reevaluate.

We're still in touch with some substantial deposit teams and some substantial people on the lending side, but it takes time to move some of these, and we're also trying to stage these where we keep OpEx in check, and we can show that we're driving the efficiency ratio down every quarter.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Yeah, I'd say that generally we're where we want to be. We had concentrated on bringing deposit teams on for the last 18 months, and then we really focused on building up the remainder of these verticals in the first part of this year. I think we're pretty comfortable where we are today in meeting our goals and strategic goals in terms of the verticals we're looking at. The pipelines are starting to really build in those verticals, so we're very pleased. I think those new hires are going to be at break even or profitable very quickly based on the pipeline we're seeing.

Mark Fitzgibbon (Head of FSG Research)

Okay. Stu, I'm curious, at a high level, it feels like M&A is starting to pick back up. Do you see that as an opportunity for Dime, or are you still more internally focused right now? Any comments around M&A?

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Look, there are opportunities out there, we're certainly interested. As you know, the market is not a target-rich environment. We are looking at options and are certainly interested. Just as important, or more importantly, we've been able to significantly grow the balance sheet and think we can continue to do that organically. If opportunities present themselves, we will certainly take a look.

Mark Fitzgibbon (Head of FSG Research)

Okay. Lastly, I guess I'm curious your thoughts on how a Mamdani-Myrie win, you know, might impact your New York City multifamily rent-regulated book. Obviously, I know you're de-emphasizing that business, but any thoughts on sort of how you might handle that?

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Look, you know, there's no guarantee he's going to win. Obviously, the Rent Guidelines Board had just announced new rent increases that go into effect in October. You know, there's not a lot of near-term concern, but obviously, if he were to be elected and were to, you know, affect the Rent Guidelines Board in such a way that rent freezes were put in place, we're taking a look at that. We've been through this before. We've had several years of rent freezes in New York City before. Our portfolio remains very strong, as you can see, and as we reported, we still have no non-performing multifamilies. The other thing is our rent-regulated portfolio is very granular. The average loan size is about $2.8 million.

Also important, all the pre-2019 portfolio that we're subject to, the changes in the law regarding passing on capital expenses and increasing rents, all those loans, what remains of them, which is in the $400 million range, have all repriced at this point and are current. We're monitoring it. We've looked at what it might mean to the portfolio, but we think we have a pretty strong portfolio, good debt service coverage, and good borrowers, a very granular portfolio with generational owners. We're going to continue to monitor it. We'll see what happens in the election, and we'll manage through it as the market has managed through it in the past.

Mark Fitzgibbon (Head of FSG Research)

Thank you.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Thanks, Mark.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Breese of Stephens Inc. Your line is now open.

Matthew Breese (Managing Director)

Hey, good morning. Hey, Matt, I was hoping you could touch a little bit on, you know, cost of deposits. It was, you know, obviously demand deposit growth this quarter was really solid, and you continued to make gains there, but the overall cost of deposits was flat. Can you just talk about, you know, in the absence of rate cuts, is there room to reduce costs, or are we about done?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, Matt, same answer as last quarter. We're bringing in new deposits, probably in the low to mid-2% area. We don't have a very large CD base at the bank. There's probably around $300 million-$350 million of CDs that are maturing in the third quarter. The rate on that is probably $3.65%-$3.70%. We're probably retaining 90% of that at 3%. The CD book probably gives us a basis point or two. There's probably a basis point or two that we can shave off, but that'll probably be offset by new deposits coming in. I think growing deposits is important for us. I think absent rate cuts, this is a reasonable level for us on deposit costs. More of the NIM expansion story for us is on the asset repricing side going forward.

Matthew Breese (Managing Director)

Great. On the new verticals, I think in the press release and just, you know, quickly, it was, you know, corporate slash specialty finance, lender finance, fund finance. Could you just give us some flavor for how those, how loans are priced on those verticals, spreads over SOFR, and some sense for historical loss content?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Yeah, go ahead.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, no, I think these are primarily floating rate assets, Matt, for us. It's going to help with the asset liability management profile. I would say on the, I'll start with the healthcare, which you didn't ask about, but which we've been in the business. That's probably a SOFR plus $300-ish business on the healthcare side. I think some of these other verticals are anywhere between $250-$300 over SOFR, basically. I'd say fund finance historically has really not had any asset quality issues over time. We're really just doing subscription lines, basically, which is the safest part of that business. I think in some of the other verticals as well, we're not really seeing a lot of historical loss content, and we're going to do it carefully and appropriately, like we did with the build-out of healthcare over time. We don't expect loss content.

We're getting to see new transactions coming in, and we've built a number of different businesses, right? That's going to give us flexibility over time to pace loan growth over time.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

I say generally that the spreads are $225-$300 in all the verticals. We're seeing, as I said, some pretty strong pipeline activity. We're excited about that. All of it's basically floating rate.

Matthew Breese (Managing Director)

In terms of balances, if everything goes according to plan, or if you want to reference the folks you've hired to prior books, 12 or 24 months from now, to what extent do you think this might impact loan growth? What could be the potential kind of loan balances here?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, I think we do use healthcare as a template, Matt, for this. We started that business probably two, two and a half years back at this point. We're probably at around $300 million-$350 million of balances on the healthcare side. I think that's a good template for a 24-month-ish period. Over the slightly longer term, if you think about 36 to 48 months, we'd like each of these businesses to be a $0.5 billion vertical for us, basically. That's how we'd think about it.

Matthew Breese (Managing Director)

Appreciate that. Last one is just, Avi, could you update us on kind of reserve plans? I think the loan loss reserve is up to 86 basis points. I think there's a push to get it higher. Could you just kind of update us on where you want to be by year-end?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, when we, you know, I think we've started talking about this probably a year back this time, Matt, or maybe nine months back. I think the goal was over the medium to longer term, getting to 90 basis points to 1% plus or minus. It's hard to, you know, every quarter, know what the next quarter is going to do because it depends on the CECL model, depends on stuff coming in and out. I think going forward, as we transition the balance sheet and do more CNI, naturally the ratio is going to go up. It's not a hard and fast number we need to get to by any circumstances, but just as we run our models internally and look at doing more in some of these verticals over time, I think you're going to get to that 90 basis points to 1% area.

We're at 86 basis points right now. We're happy it's trended up. We're getting more in line with a local peer group, national peer group type, given the risk profile of our assets. I would say hard to predict every quarter if it's going to go up from here on out, but it's definitely directionally, we'd like it to be in the 90 to 1% area.

Matthew Breese (Managing Director)

That's all I had. Thanks for taking my questions.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Thanks, Matt. Appreciate it.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you'll need to press *11 on your telephone. Our next question comes from the line of Manuel Navas of D.A. Davidson & Company. Please go ahead.

Manuel Navas (Analyst)

Hey, I appreciate the color on the loan repricing outlook. Do you have the balances just in the second half of the year?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah. We have in the third quarter, Manuel, that's probably around $400 million at a rate of around 4%. In the fourth quarter, there's around $200 million at a rate of around 4.30%. It's important, even as $400 million, a lot of them are towards the end of the quarter, which is why when we gave our NIM guidance, it was, you know, look, we're probably going to see more pronounced NIM expansion in the fourth quarter because we won't have to actually reprice for you to get the benefit of it. The total quantum is around $600 million and split $400 million and $200 million third and fourth quarter.

Manuel Navas (Analyst)

That's great. That's really helpful. Where do, you know, Stu discussed that the private banking group has like 1,500 accounts, where do balances stand right now there?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

$2.2 billion.

Manuel Navas (Analyst)

Are pipelines as strong as ever? I mean, with those new accounts, you're going to be doing some remix of the balance sheet that keeps the balance sheet in the low single-digit growth, but this deposit group still has plenty of runway to go forward, correct?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, we think so. I mean, look, same thing we've said historically that we think each of these groups, it's going to take three to four years for them to reach a steadier state. Stu said in his remarks, account openings are very strong, similar to the pace of prior quarters, basically. In an individual quarter here or there, it may be up or down, but we really track it from an account opening and customer opening perspective, and that's not slowed down yet.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Yeah, on top of that, the verticals that we've brought on and the pipeline that's out there, we're seeing significant deposit balance opportunity as well. It's just not one-sided balance sheet on these new verticals. We're pretty bullish on continued growth there.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, just one other thing I would add is, you know, our branch network has had a really, really solid first six months of the year. They've made up a lot of balances, especially from stuff that we've lost in 2023. Really seeing three different avenues for deposit growth of the private banking groups we hired, the new lending verticals, as well as the branch network.

Manuel Navas (Analyst)

That's great. As you're getting more and more funding and more opportunities, where could loan growth get to, especially with all the verticals, like in 2026 and 2027? You do have some of the repricing coming at the same time, but like where could loan growth get longer term?

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, if this is an indirect way of asking us for guidance for 2026, we're going to stay away from that. Look, I think, you know, Matt asked a question, where do we think these verticals could be over time, right? Each of these, in the medium to long run, we'd want them to be $300 million-$500 million verticals. We're going to see some attrition on the transactional CRI side, but there's no reason we should not be a mid to high single-digits growth bank once the CRI ratio gets to a level that we want it to be at. In the near term, as we said earlier, we're managing the CRI ratio to get down to around 400% by year-end, and we're pretty much there at this point, right?

It's really a tale of two balance sheets with the CRI that we're reducing, but then medium to longer term, I think mid to high single digits is a good number for the bank.

Manuel Navas (Analyst)

Okay, I appreciate that. Thank you very much.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Thanks, Manuel.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of David Konrad of KBW. Your line is now open.

David Konrad (Managing Director)

Yeah, good morning. Thanks for all the detailed guidance. Just want to talk a little bit about capital. Really strong here north of 11% CET1. You've got an improving profitability coming next year, but I guess it still sounds like the number one priority is the organic growth of the business rather than anything near-term in terms of capital deployment or return to shareholders.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, David, that's fair. On our last earnings call, we got a similar question and response is pretty similar right now. Obviously, still a little bit of uncertainty with tariffs. We've hired a lot of productive teams right now. What we said is, when we get to the end of the year, early 2026, we're going to reevaluate the buyback, things like that. From a pure corporate finance perspective, we feel our stock is very undervalued at this point. At the same time, we do think having capital ratios higher than pretty much everybody in our local peer group is a big competitive advantage as we go after new verticals. I'd say in the near term, we'd like, we're happy to be accreting capital. I think in the medium to longer term, as we've shown in the past, we've distributed capital to shareholders when we can.

David Konrad (Managing Director)

Great, thank you.

Operator (participant)

All right, I'm showing no further questions at this time. Actually, we do have one more in the queue here. All right, we have Matthew Breese returning from Stephens Inc. Please go ahead.

Matthew Breese (Managing Director)

Hey guys, just one more. Avi, could you help me out with cash, cash equivalents, liquidity, deployment strategy? You're sitting on just a lot of cash here. Curious where you feel comfortable bringing it down to and some sense for timing. Thanks.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Yeah, I think in the near term, we're not focused on buying securities, Matt. If we did decide to do so, there certainly would be a boost in NIM and a boost to net interest income. We're trying to run the balance sheet for the more medium to longer term. I think over the medium to longer term, a lot of the cash would probably be redeployed into some of the new lending verticals that we're in. Our loan to deposit ratio is 91%-92%. We're very comfortable between that 90%-95%. I'd say in the medium to longer term, we'd like a lot of that to go into some of the CNI items that we're focused on, which are floating rate assets.

I'd say in the near term, we're not out there buying securities and changing the ALM profile to something different than what we want to do. We are giving up some earnings in the near term, but I think we're creating a balance sheet that will have a structurally higher NIM over time and set us up for different rate environments by keeping the cash position where it is.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Yeah, what we're seeing in the pipeline with the existing verticals and the teams we brought on, plus with the new verticals, we think that we can quickly deploy over the next six to nine months excess liquidity at meaningful NIM improvements. That's our view as to our current cash position.

Matthew Breese (Managing Director)

Great, I appreciate it. Thanks for taking all my questions.

Avi Reddy (CFO)

Thanks, Matt.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. I am showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn it back to Stuart Lubow for closing remarks.

Stuart Lubow (President and CEO)

Thank you, Steven, and thank you all to our dedicated employees, our shareholders for their continued support, and we look forward to speaking with you after our third quarter.

Operator (participant)

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.